Liu, H.

9599 Background: We have previously identified overall a single-item measure for baseline quality of life (QOL) as a strong prognostic factor for survival (Tan, ASCO 2008), and that fatigue was an important component of patient QOL (Sloan, 2007). To explore whether patient-reported fatigue was supplemental or redundant to the prognostic information of overall QOL, we performed a patient-level pooled analysis of 43 NCCTG and MCCC oncology clinical trials of the effect of baseline fatigue on OS. Methods: 3,915 patients participating in 43 trials provided data at baseline for fatigue on a single-item 0–100 point scale. OS was tested for association with clinically deficient fatigue (CDF, score 0–50, n=1,497) vs not clinically deficient fatigue (nCDF, score 51–100, n=2,418). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for the effects of overall QOL, performance score, race, disease site, age and gender. Results: Baseline fatigue was a strong predictor of OS for the entire patient cohort (CDF vs. nCDF: 31.5 mos vs >83.9 mos, p<0.0001). The effect sizes were consistent across different disease sites (GI, esophageal, head and neck, prostate, lung, breast and others). After controlling for covariates, including performance status and overall QOL, baseline fatigue remained a strong prognostic factor in multivariate models (CDF vs. nCDF: HR=1.23, p=0.02). Conclusions: Fatigue is a strong prognostic factor for OS independent of overall QOL and PS in a wide variety of oncology patient populations. Single-item measures of overall QOL and fatigue can help to identify vulnerable subpopulations among cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9563 Background: Fatigue is a prevalent and debilitating symptom reported by cancer patients (pts) which compromises a pt's quality of life (QOL). This study examined the relationship between PR fatigue and QOL as well as cancer-related symptoms (CRS) in 43 North Central Cancer Treatment Group and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center clinical trials. Methods: 3,915 pts from 43 oncology clinical trials provided baseline fatigue data on a single-item 0–100 point scale. Pts' QOL assessment included a single-item overall QOL and associated QOL domains measured by numerical analogues, the Profile of Mood States (POMS), and PR symptom assessment measures. Associations between fatigue and QOL domains were assessed by Spearman correlation coefficients. Wilcoxon rank sum test compared QOL scores between pts with clinically deficient fatigue(CDF, score ≤50) vs. no clinically deficient fatigue (nCDF, score>50). Changes from baseline in fatigue and QOL were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test with a 20-point change defined as clinically meaningful. Results: 38% of pts reported CDF at baseline and 45% of pts reported CDF at last assessment. Fatigue was only moderately correlated at best with overall QOL, pain, POMS, social and physical function (Spearman rho's of .27,.40, .56, .38 and .38 respectively). Pts with CDF averaged over 10 points lower overall QOL, pain, POMS, social, and physical function (see table below, all p<.0001) as well as worsening CRS including sleepiness, nausea, headache, abnormal sweating, trouble sleeping, dry mouth, and sexual dysfunction (all p<.001). Pts with 20+ points worsening in fatigue declined in overall QOL, physical function, pain and POMS (all p<.0001). Conclusions: Patients with CDF suffer greater deficits in QOL and CRS. Patients report fatigue as distinctly different from overall QOL, pain, physical, social, mood status and CRS. Fatigue appears with a broad spectrum of CRS clusters. Routine measurement and management of fatigue could impact QOL and treatment-related symptoms. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Estrogen receptors (ERs) play key roles in breast cancer development and influence treatment outcome in breast cancer patients. More than 60% of human breast cancer tumors express ER and many of those are Estrogen (E2) dependent. ER positive tumors are considered to have a good prognosis; however some tumors escape to E2 requirements. Thus, the identification of molecules that regulate ER function may facilitate development of breast cancer treatment strategies. The pro-angiogenic factor CYR61 induces breast cancer cells to bypass the normal estrogen requirements for growth and acquire an estrogen-independent and antiestrogen resistant phenotype. However, the mechanism by which CYR61 regulates the hormonal response in breast cancer is not well understood. We over-expressed CYR61 in the ER positive cells MCF-7 (MCF-7/CYR61). Our results demonstrated that CYR61 induces constitutive transcriptional activity of the ER, which is independent of E2. Moreover, we demonstrated that CYR61 co-localizes with the ER in the nucleus and casually CYR61 transcriptional activity is regulated, at least in part by FOXO3a binding site. In search of the mechanism by which CYR61 that modulates hormonal response we discovered that CYR61 and FOXO3a interact in the presence of E2. This functional interplay among CYR61/ER/FOXO3a most likely plays a critical role in blocking hormone-response of breast cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, these studies demonstrate that CYR61 and FOXO3a are novel therapeutic targets to halt hormone-independent breast carcinomas. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 5145.