Ihara, Keiko

Background Many guidelines list migraine with aura (MwA) as a contraindication to estrogen-containing combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) due to vascular risks. However, current evidence is based on small sample studies with potential influence by confounding factors. Additionally, few studies have examined the vascular risk associated with modern CHCs with lower dose estrogen, particularly in relation to aura status. The present study aims to investigate the vascular risk of modern CHCs in women with migraine with and without aura. Methods We used a de-identified electronic medical record database with 120 million patients across multiple health systems in the United States of America. We included female patients aged 18–45 years who received a migraine diagnosis code, had at least three office visits within three years, and were prescribed at least one migraine-specific medication within 6 months following the first outpatient visit. All data after 2010 were included. Patients with prior cardiovascular events were excluded. Our composite endpoint consisted of acute ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism and intravenous thrombolytic administration. We stratified our analysis according to CHC exposure and aura status and compared the incidence of the endpoint with high-dimensional propensity score-matching between CHC users and non-users in (i) the overall cohort, (ii) MwA and (iii) migraine without aura (MwoA); between MwA and MwoA in (iv) patients prescribed CHCs; and in (v) those without CHC prescriptions. Results We included 5535 patients who received CHC prescriptions and 21,520 who did not. 114 (2.06%) of CHC users and 547 (2.54%) of CHC non-users had at least one vascular event. With propensity score-matched comparison, the composite endpoint did not significantly differ between CHC and non-CHC in the overall migraine group, those with MwA and the MwoA group. In those prescribed CHC, MwA and MwoA did not differ in all the outcomes. For CHC non-users, MwA was associated with a higher incidence of acute ischemic stroke (hazard ratio = 2.45; 95% confidence interval = 1.58–3.78; p < 0.001; n = 6201 in each group) and the composite endpoint (hazard ratio = 1.34; 95% confidence interval = 1.08–1.67; p = 0.008). Conclusions Our real-world study showed that exposure to modern CHC was not associated with a significant increase in vascular risk in women aged 18–45 years with migraine, MwA or MwoA who have no prior cardiovascular events. However, in those who never received CHC, MwA was associated with higher vascular risks compared to MwoA. While limitations exist using large scale electronic medical record databases for analysis, our results suggest that carefully designed prospective studies should be conducted to reassess the vascular risk associated with CHC use in women with migraine, especially MwA.

Background The term ‘precision medicine’ encompasses strategies to optimize diagnosis and outcome prediction and to tailor treatment for individual patients, in consideration of their unique characteristics. The greater availability of multifaceted datasets and strategies to model such data have made precision medicine increasingly possible in recent years. Precision medicine is especially needed in the migraine field since the response to migraine treatments is not universal amongst all individuals with migraine. Objective To provide a narrative review describing contributions to achieving precision medicine for migraine treatment. Methods A search of PubMed for English language articles of human participants published from 2005 to January 2024 was conducted to identify articles that reported research contributing to precision medicine for migraine treatment. The published literature was categorized and summarized according to the type of data that were included: clinical phenotypes, genomics, proteomics, physiologic measures, and brain imaging. Results Published studies have investigated characteristics associated with acute and preventive treatment responses, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, triptans, onabotulinumtoxinA, and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, in patients with episodic or chronic migraine. There is evidence that clinical, genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, physiologic, and brain imaging features might associate with migraine treatment outcomes, although inconsistencies for such findings clearly exist. Conclusions The published literature suggests that there are clinical and biological features which associate with, and might be useful for predicting, migraine treatment responses. To achieve precision medicine for migraine treatment, further research is needed that validates and expands on existing findings and tests the accuracy and value of migraine treatment prediction models in clinical settings.

Purpose of review Posttraumatic headache (PTH), a headache that develops within 7 days of a causative injury, is one of the most common secondary headaches, mostly attributed to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Because presence of preinjury headache is a risk factor for developing PTH and PTH symptoms often resemble migraine or tension-type headache, the association between PTH and primary headaches has attracted attention from clinicians and scientists. Recent findings Recent studies on epidemiological aspects, headache features, risk factors, imaging characteristics, and response to treatment, suggest overlapping features and distinct objective findings in PTH compared to migraine. Summary We argue that PTH is distinct from migraine. Therefore, PTH epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis should continue to be investigated separately from migraine.