Cheville, AL

Abstract Lymphedema (LE) is a common complication of cancer treatment, and has been identified as the number one issue by breast cancer survivors with incidence as high as 70%. Given the long-term survivorship of these women, LE is a widely prevalent condition. Irradiation of axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes increases a patient's risk of LE onset and progression by as much as 2-fold. It is anticipated that a more individualized approach to post-surgical irradiation of breast cancer patients may reduce radiation-induced lymph node (LN) damage without sacrificing control rates, although it is noted that a definitive radiation exposure threshold below which LNs physiological integrity will be preserved is currently lacking. To identify the locations of the small, non-pathological but physiologically relevant LNs which drain the arm after breast cancer surgery and incorporate them into radiation planning, filtered 99mTc sulfur colloid (TcSC) was administered and a SPECT-CT scan was acquired for 22 patients immobilized in the treatment position. These images were registered with the Radiation Oncology planning CT scan, and draining LN were contoured automatically using a threshold of 50% maximum intensity. Two treatment plans were generated for each patient, one per routine clinical practice (STD) and the other (MOD) with treatment fields modified to minimize dose to the LNs visible on SPECT/CT images while ensuringthat ≥50Gy or biologic equivalent is delivered to target tissues. 53 draining LN were identified, 54% of which were inside the STD plan fields but could be blocked in the MOD plan fields. 62% of LN in the STD plans vs. 17% in the MOD plans receiving a mean of ≥10Gy, and 27% in the STD plans vs. 6% in the MOD plans receiving a mean of ≥40Gy. Patient-specific LN dose reduction can be achieved through integration of SPECT/CT images into the radiation planning process. These patients will be followed for the development of LE, to estimate an exposure threshold below which LN preservation is assured. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-20.

Abstract Abstract #3103 Introduction: Lymphedema is well-known in the arm but can also occur in the breast. Diagnosis is currently non-standardized and based on clinical impression. We sought to determine if skin thickness could serve as a useful measure in the diagnosis of breast lymphedema (BLE).
 Methods: Patients undergoing unilateral non-mastectomy procedures were enrolled on this prospective clinical study preoperatively and evaluated for signs and symptoms of lymphedema in the operated breast in the postoperative period. Patients with established BLE were also studied. BLE diagnosis was independent of ultrasound findings and was based on a graded physical exam targeting clinical signs of edema and erythema. Skin thickness was measured with ultrasound at the 6 o'clock position of both breasts. Differences in skin thickness were assessed by the ratio of skin thickness in the operated and contralateral breasts, with comparison of means by two-sample t-test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) and to determine optimal cutpoints.
 Results: Ninety-seven women were studied; 85 were enrolled preoperatively and 12 postoperatively after a diagnosis of BLE. Median length of follow-up overall was 8 months. Of the 97 women, 46 had BLE at one or more follow-up visit with median time to first diagnosis of 3 months. Mean measured skin thickness was 2.3 ± 0.5mm in unaffected breasts and 3.2 ± 1.0 mm in operated breasts. Women with BLE had significantly greater skin thickness in the operated breast compared to the contralateral breast, with a mean skin thickness ratio of 1.83 ± 0.57 in patients with BLE compared to 1.18 ± 0.40 among those without BLE (p<0.0001). Skin thickness ratio provided excellent discrimination for BLE, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86. At a ratio of 1.32 or greater (32% greater skin thickness in operated versus contralateral breast), sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing BLE were 81% and 82% respectively. A single measure of skin thickness in the operated breast also correlated well with diagnosis of BLE, with skin thickness of 3.2 mm or greater demonstrating sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 82%, AUC 0.82.
 Conclusions: Breast lymphedema results in skin edema and increased skin thickness that can be quantified with ultrasound. Measuring breast skin thickness- either as a single reading or as a ratio to the unaffected breast- may be useful in the diagnosis of breast lymphedema. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 3103.