Back to Authors

Pruitt, David W.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-4111

Mayo Clinic

University of Cincinnati

Citations 4

Determination of core knowledge and skills for Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine certification: A systematic practice analysis
Murphy, Kevin P. , Apkon, Susan , Raddatz, Mikaela M. , Kassam, Siddiq, Driscoll, Sherilyn W. , Kinney, Carolyn L. , Pruitt, David W.

Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine | July 3, 2025 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 230-243

10.1177/18758894251353067 Get It

Purpose: In 2022, the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) contracted with Professional Services Industries LLC to complete a Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) practice analysis. The goal was to develop an updated examination content outline that accurately depicts the knowledge and skills expected for a competent PRM physician following completion of training. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of practice analysis and to present candidate perceptions of scope of practice and relevancy of content from the first two examinations in which the new outline was applied. Methods: The practice analysis process was undertaken in four distinct stages: subject matter expert meetings to determine the tasks and knowledge areas; the development, issuance and analysis of a national survey; development of exam specifications; and results verification. Results were analyzed by a psychometrician and team to determine mean relative importance of task and knowledge items. A new outline was then created and used for the administration of the 2023 and 2024 ABPMR PRM Certification Examinations. Results: All active board certified PRM physicians identified were sent surveys via e-mail. One hundred ninety six (61.1%) respondents completed the survey. The top five task statements in order of perceived importance were performing history and physical examinations, managing muscle and tone abnormalities, prescribing orthoses and equipment, prescribing therapy services, and making appropriate specialty care referrals. The top five knowledge statements in order of perceived importance were cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, abnormal growth and development, neuromuscular disorders, and musculoskeletal conditions. The new PRM Examination content outline created included six domains and 22 subdomains of knowledge content areas. A higher percentage of initial certification candidates sitting for the 2023 and 2024 ABPMR PRM Certification Examinations selected “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” when responding to the examination content reflecting both scope of training and relevancy. Conclusion: A practice analysis process was undertaken resulting in a new content outline for the ABPMR PRM Certification Examination. Following the implementation of the new content outline, initial certification candidate survey responses showed improved favorability regarding content reflecting scope of training and relevancy.
Reply to: Anomalous education: You can't bypass electrodiagnostic training in PM&R residency
Burris, Joseph E., Worsowicz, Greg, Kinney, Carolyn L. , Pruitt, David W , Worsowicz, Greg M, Kinney, Carolyn , Pruitt, David W.

PM&R | October 26, 2024 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 349-350

10.1002/pmrj.13280 Get It

Revisions to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's program requirements for Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation: Input from the Tri‐Organizational Graduate Medical Education Committee
Pruitt, David W. , Burris, Joseph E., Worsowicz, Greg, Kinney, Carolyn L. , Worsowicz, Greg M, Kinney, Carolyn , Pruitt, David W

PM&R | June 5, 2024 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 779-784

10.1002/pmrj.13212 Get It

Current practice focus trends in physical medicine and rehabilitation
Kinney, Carolyn L. , Pruitt, David W. , Francisco, Gerard E. , Raddatz, Mikaela M. , Sabharwal, Sunil , Kinney, Carolyn , Pruitt, David W

PM&R | December 20, 2023 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 738-744

10.1002/pmrj.13119 Get It

Abstract Background Physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) is a diverse specialty, growing and evolving over a variety of subspecialty and practice focus areas. Accurate data regarding practice patterns of physiatrists are essential for updating requirements in training and certification, particularly as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education begins its process to update of the PM&R core residency training requirements. This study analyzes practice trends for nearly 98% of physiatrists in active practice, the largest study to date. Objective To update current demographics of physicians specializing in PM&R, including current areas of practice focus, to analyze the alignment of practice focus with subspecialty certification, and to determine the extent that electromyography is a component of current physiatric practice. Design Retrospective analysis of deidentified responses from American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) board‐certified PM&R physicians (diplomates) on annual enrollment in the ABPMR Continuing Certification program. Participants A total of 9543 ABPMR diplomates. Main Outcome Measures Demographics – age, gender, years in practice, practice setting(s) and area(s). Practice focus, subspecialty certifications. Results The majority of practicing physiatrists are men (62%) although the percentage of women in the field is growing (38%). Nearly 80% of physiatrists report more than one practice focus area, with pain medicine and sports medicine/musculoskeletal practices most commonly reported. Conclusions This study confirms the growth trends in PM&R in pain and sports medicine but also highlights the substantial number of physiatrists focusing their practices in areas related to neurorehabilitation and medical rehabilitation. The large majority of physiatrists incorporate multiple focus areas into their practices. Electromyography is a focus for a declining percentage of practicing physiatrists.