Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been proven to improve clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF). However, there remains a paucity of data on the potential cardioprotective impact of SGLT2i in cancer patients receiving anthracyclines. Aim: To evaluate if SGLT2i use is associated with improved outcomes in anthracycline-treated cancer patients. Methods: Using TriNetX Global Research Network from 2013 to 2021, patients diagnosed with cancer and receiving anthracycline therapy were identified and categorized into those who were taking SGLT2i versus those who were not. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to control for baseline characteristics between the two groups. Patients were followed for 2 years. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and secondary endpoints were new-onset HF, acute HF exacerbation, myocardial infarction, new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter, and all-cause hospitalization. Results: A total of 82,369 anthracycline-treated cancer patients were identified. After propensity score matching application, 1,412 patients were included in our analysis (706 patients in each group). Patients on SGLT2i had lower rates of all-cause mortality (OR: 0.7 [95% CI: 0.56, 0.88]; P=0.002), acute HF exacerbation (OR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.41-1]; P=0.048), and new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (OR: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.33, 0.8]; P=0.003) compared to those not on SGLT2i. The incidence of myocardial infarction, new-onset HF, and all-cause hospitalization were similar between the two groups (Figure). Conclusion: Among cancer patients receiving anthracyclines, SGLT2i were associated with lower rates of mortality, acute HF exacerbations, and new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter and similar rates of myocardial infarction, new-onset HF, and hospitalization.
Abstract 13931: Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Rheumatic Heart Disease After Mitral Valve Replacement With Bioprosthesis
Background: We sought to investigate the outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (bMVR) due to rheumatic heart disease. Methods: We performed a retrospective study using the TriNetX global database to identify patients with atrial fibrillation and bMVR due to rheumatic heart disease from 2010 to 2020. Patients who had mechanical mitral or aortic valve replacement were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: DOAC group and Warfarin group. 1:1 propensity-score matching to control for baseline differences between the two groups was performed. The primary endpoint was ischemic stroke and secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, and all-cause hospitalization over a mean follow-up of 3 years. Results: A total of 2,011 patients were identified and 586 were included after propensity-score matching (293 patients in each group). Patients in the DOAC group, compared to the warfarin group aged 68.9 ± 11.2 vs 68.2 ± 11 years (P=0.41) and 63.4% vs 63.8% were females (P=0.93). There was no significant difference between the two groups in ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, and all-cause hospitalization. (Table 1, figure 1). Conclusion: In patients with atrial fibrillation and bMVR due to rheumatic heart disease, DOACs use was associated with similar rates of ischemic stroke, mortality, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization compared to warfarin.