Yadav, Sumeet K.

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated immune thrombocytopenia (ICI-ITP) has been described in case reports and small case series, but comprehensive data on its incidence, risk factors, clinical features, treatment, and outcomes are lacking. We reviewed medical records of all adults initiating ICI therapy between 2016 and 2023 at 29 US hospitals across 7 major cancer centers to identify patients with ICI-ITP. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors, and Cox modeling was performed to assess the association between ICI-ITP, its severity, and mortality. Among 86 467 patients, ICI-ITP occurred in 214 (0.25%). Independent risk factors included lower baseline platelet count, combination ICI therapy, stage IV cancer, and additional immune-related adverse events. ICI-ITP occurred at a median of 8 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 4-18) after ICI initiation, with a median nadir platelet count of 41 × 109/L (IQR, 17 × 109/L to 64 × 109/L). Patients were treated with glucocorticoids (n = 106 [49.5%]), immune globulin (n = 39 [18.2%]), and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (n = 29 [13.6%]). Recovery occurred in 161 patients (75.2%) at a median of 2.3 weeks (IQR, 1.0-5.3). Of 76 patients rechallenged with ICIs, 23 (30.3%) developed recurrent ICI-ITP. ICI-ITP and its severity were associated with higher all-cause mortality, with a nearly threefold increase in risk among patients with severe ICI-ITP than those without ICI-ITP (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.96 [95% confidence interval, 2.14-4.08]). These findings establish ICI-ITP as a rare but clinically significant complication of ICI therapy, provide, to our knowledge, the first large-scale description of its risk factors and clinical course, and underscore the importance of timely recognition and management.

572 Background: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is sometimes used to shrink hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers to improve breast conservation rates and reduce axillary nodal burden. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, several organizations endorsed NET use to mitigate the harm of surgery delay when cancer operations were less available due to infection transmission concerns. However, the real-world patterns of NET during this period are understudied. This study investigated the alteration of NET utilization patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with stage I-III invasive HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer between 2018-2022 in the NCDB. Estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor positivity was required for inclusion in the cohort. Receipt of NET was defined as initiation of endocrine therapy ≥ 14 days before the patient’s first surgical procedure. The study cohort generation and statistical analysis were conducted using Stata and R 4.4.3. A two-tailed p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 495,098 patients were included in the cohort, 195,371 in 2018-2019 (pre-pandemic), 91,686 in 2020 (early pandemic), 106,157 in 2021 (mid-pandemic), and 101,884 in 2022 (late pandemic). NET utilization was increased in the early pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic (seen in 5.8% vs 2.4% of the cohort, Chi-square p value < 0.001), but this use fell back to 3.4% in the mid-pandemic and 3.5% in the late-pandemic. The median (IQR) duration of NET was 15.7 (6.4-26.6) weeks in the pre-pandemic, 9.3 (5.4-18.7) weeks in the early pandemic, 13.2 (5.8-25.7) weeks in the mid-pandemic, and 12.0 (6-24.6) weeks in late pandemic (Kruskal-Wallis p value = 0.001). The transient increase in NET utilization during the early pandemic was more pronounced among patients with tumors < 5 cm and node-negative disease. Conclusions: Our study identified a significant shift in the utilization of NET for HR+/HER2- breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pandemic-era NET policies produced a short-lived practice change that was only partially sustained once surgical access normalized. NET utilization (%) by subgroup and year for stage I-III HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Variable Category 2018-2019 2020 2021 2022 Overall NET Use 2.4 5.8 3.4 3.5 Age Group (years old) <50 2.2 4.9 3.9 4.0 >=50 2.4 6.0 3.3 3.4 Tumor Size <5 cm 2.0 5.5 2.9 3.1 >=5 cm 9.0 9.7 11.2 11.6 Histology Subtype Ductal 2.2 5.5 3.3 3.4 Lobular 3.6 7.1 4.4 4.8 Ductal/Lobular 2.6 6.2 4.3 3.6 Other 1.9 6.7 2.5 2.6 KI67 <20% 2.5 6.4 3.4 3.3 >=20% 2.3 5.5 3.5 3.7 Tumor Grade Well differentiated 1.9 5.8 2.4 2.6 Moderately differentiated 2.7 6.1 3.9 3.9 Poorly differentiated/undifferentiated 2.9 4.8 4.3 4.8 Node Positivity Positive 5.2 5.6 9.3 9.5 Negative 2.0 5.8 2.6 2.7

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of myeloid precursors and rapid progression. Historically consisting of intensive chemotherapy, AML management has evolved significantly due to advances in molecular diagnostics and risk stratification. This review discusses current therapeutic paradigms in AML, emphasizing the growing role of personalized medicine across age and risk groups. For younger, fit patients, intensive regimens such as the “7 + 3” protocol remain the standard, often enhanced by targeted agents like FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and IDH inhibitors. Older or unfit individuals benefit from low-intensity treatments such as hypomethylating agents combined with venetoclax, now considered a frontline standard of care. The use of liposomal chemotherapy (CPX-351), measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring, and maintenance therapy further refine post-remission strategies. Emerging therapies, including menin inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, and immunotherapies like CAR-T cells and vaccines, offer additional options, especially in relapsed/refractory settings. This comprehensive review outlines the current landscape and future directions in AML therapy, emphasizing the transition toward individualized, mutation-driven treatment strategies.

Background: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke, constituting 0.5–3% of all strokes with an extremely varied spectrum of presentation, predisposing factors, neuroimaging findings, and eventual outcomes. A high index of suspicion is needed because timely diagnosis can significantly alter the natural course of the disease, reduce acute complications, and improve long-term outcomes. Due to its myriad causative factors, protean presentation, and association with several systemic diseases, CVT is encountered not only by neurologists but also by emergency care practitioners, internists, hematologists, obstetricians, and pediatricians. Discussion: Anticoagulation remains the mainstay of treatment for CVT. Heparin and warfarin previously had been the anticoagulation of choice. Recently there has been an increased interest in utilizing direct-acting oral anticoagulants in the treatment of CVT given comparable safety and efficacy with ease of utilization. However recent clinical guidelines given by multiple societies including the American Stroke guidelines and European guidelines do not include these agents so far in their treatment recommendations. Ongoing multicentric clinical trials are currently reviewing the role of these agents in both short-term as well as long-term. Our review of the literature supports the safety and reinforces the efficacy of DOAC in the treatment of CVT. Additionally, patient satisfaction has been shown to be better with the use of DOAC. In conclusion, DOAC continues to have a valid role in the management of CVT.

Bleeding diathesis is an uncommon side effect of ibrutinib use and is seen in less than 5% of the population. We describe a case of an elderly woman with ibrutinib-induced spontaneous major extradural haematoma presenting as acute compressive myelopathy. She is a known case of splenic marginal zone lymphoma with multiple extramedullary relapses and presented to the emergency department with acute-onset low backache, followed by urinary retention. MRI revealed extradural haemorrhage. After possible evaluation, she was diagnosed with ibrutinib-induced extradural haematoma.

Blood transfusion is a common therapeutic intervention in hospitalized patients. There are numerous indications for transfusion, including anemia and coagulopathy with deficiency of single or multiple coagulation components such as platelets or coagulation factors. Nevertheless, the practice of transfusion in critically ill patients has been controversial mainly due to a lack of evidence and the need to consider the appropriate clinical context for transfusion. Further, transfusion carries many risk factors that must be balanced with benefits. Therefore, transfusion practice in ICU patients has constantly evolved, and we endeavor to present a contemporary review of transfusion practices in this population guided by clinical trials and expert guidelines.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a treatment paradigm used to remove harmful molecules from the body. In short, it is a technique that employs a process that functions partially outside the body and involves the replacement of the patient’s plasma. It has been used in the ICU for a number of different disease states, for some as a first-line treatment modality and for others as a type of salvage therapy. This paper provides a brief review of the principles, current applications, and potential future directions of TPE in critical care settings.