Rank, Matthew A.

ABSTRACT Background Eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with epithelial barrier dysfunction. Epidemiologic studies suggest environmental factors promote disease pathogenesis. The common household detergent sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) induces epithelial barrier dysfunction and eosinophilic inflammation in mice. We hypothesized that acute SDS exposure would compromise the esophageal mucosal barrier in humans. Methods Healthy adults brushed with 2 g of an SDS‐containing toothpaste. Esophageal impedance was measured continuously pre‐/post‐toothbrushing to assess the effect of toothpaste on epithelial barrier function. SDS was measured in saliva using a methylene blue anionic substances assay. Participants completed 1‐h esophageal string tests (ESTs) pre‐/post‐toothbrushing and protein isolates from EST eluates from the proximal and distal esophagus were analyzed by tandem mass tag mass spectrometry. Results Ten of twelve subjects completed the clinical study. SDS in the initial expectorate measured immediately after toothbrushing varied markedly (median: 321.40 μg/mL; range: 169.90–1243.00 μg/mL) and was detectable in saliva in 80% of subjects (median: 9.55 μg/mL; range: 0–123.40 μg/mL) at 60 min post toothbrushing. Esophageal mucosal impedance decreased within 30 min of toothbrushing ( p < 0.01). Toothbrushing increased salivary viscosity and proteins associated with mucosal defense in EST eluates. The tight junction pathway was downregulated while the salivary secretion and complement and coagulation cascades pathways were upregulated in the proximal esophagus. Conclusion In healthy individuals, SDS remained detectable in saliva for a prolonged period after toothbrushing at concentrations previously shown to disrupt esophageal epithelial barrier function in vitro. Toothbrushing with an SDS‐containing toothpaste was associated with reduced esophageal mucosal impedance, altered salivary properties, and activated mucosal immune responses.

Introduction Asthma is a multifactorial disease influenced by genetic and environmental factors, including diet. The gut microbiome contributes to airway inflammation via the gut-lung axis, partly through production of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) from bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber. We hypothesized that dietary fiber supplementation could modulate the gut microbiome and increase SCFAs in children with asthma. Methods This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of children who were randomized to consume 12 g of soluble corn fiber (SCF) as a supplement to their usual daily diet (50% the recommended daily fiber intake) or placebo for 4–6 weeks ( clinicaltrials.gov NCT03673618). Dietary surveys, asthma symptom questionnaires, fecal, blood and nasal samples were collected before and after the intervention period to quantify fiber intake, asthma control, nasal and gut microbiome, and serum short chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Results Of the 20 children enrolled, 15 completed the intervention with an average adherence rate of 83%. SCFA concentrations and gut microbiome changes varied by individual and treatment group. No significant differences in gut or nasal alpha or beta diversity were observed between groups post-intervention. However, differential abundance analysis showed a trend toward increased Bifidobacterium in the SCF group compared to placebo (ANCOM-BC p = 0.0004, FDR q = 0.073). Discussion Supplementation of 50% of recommended daily fiber intake had minimal impact on asthma symptoms, the microbiome, or SCFA levels. Future studies should consider higher fiber doses, different fiber types, or targeting individuals with low baseline fiber intake to account for observed variability in microbiome and SCFA responses. Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03673618 , identifier NCT03673618.

Importance The optimal inhaled reliever therapy for asthma remains unclear. Objective To compare short-acting β agonists (SABA) alone with SABA combined with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and with the fast-onset, long-acting β agonist formoterol combined with ICS for asthma. Data Sources The MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched from January 1, 2020, to September 27, 2024, without language restrictions. Study Selection Pairs of reviewers independently selected randomized clinical trials evaluating (1) SABA alone, (2) ICS with formoterol, and (3) ICS with SABA (combined or separate inhalers). Data Extraction and Synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses synthesized outcomes. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Main Outcomes and Measures Asthma symptom control (5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire; range, 0-6, lower scores indicate better asthma control; minimum important difference [MID], 0.5 points), asthma-related quality of life (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; range, 1-7, higher scores indicate better quality of life; MID, 0.5 points), risk of severe exacerbations, and risk of serious adverse events. Results A total of 27 randomized clinical trials (N = 50 496 adult and pediatric patients; mean age, 41.0 years; 20 288 male [40%]) were included. Compared with SABA alone, both ICS-containing relievers were associated with fewer severe exacerbations (ICS-formoterol risk ratio [RR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60-0.72]; risk difference [RD], −10.3% [95% CI, −11.8% to −8.3%]; ICS-SABA RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.73-0.95]; RD, −4.7% [95% CI, −8.0% to −1.5%]) with high certainty. Compared with SABA alone, both ICS-containing relievers were associated with improved asthma control (ICS-formoterol RR improvement [MID] in total score, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.10]; RD, 4.1% [95% CI, 2.3%-5.9%]; ICS-SABA RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03-1.15]; RD, 5.4% [95% CI, 1.8%-8.5%]) with high certainty. In an indirect comparison with ICS-SABA, ICS-formoterol was associated with fewer severe exacerbations (RR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92]; RD, −5.5% [95% CI, −8.4% to −2.0%]) with moderate certainty. Compared with SABA alone, ICS-formoterol (RD, −0.6% [95% CI, −1.3% to 0%]) was not associated with increased risk of serious adverse events (high certainty) and ICS-SABA (RD, 0% [95% CI, −1.1% to 1.2%]) was not associated with increased risk of serious adverse events (moderate certainty). Conclusions and Relevance In this network meta-analysis of patients with asthma, ICS combined with formoterol and ICS combined with SABA were each associated with reduced asthma exacerbations and improved asthma control compared with SABA alone.

Background: Pollen is a key source of aeroallergens responsible for allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and asthma. Objective: The goal of this scoping review was to summarize current available literature on the factors that affect pollen counts, allergenicity, and thresholds that induce symptoms in individuals who were sensitized. Methods: Several databases showed no published articles with a similar scope as of January 2022. A search of these data bases yielded 373 articles for assessment. These were then reviewed for relevance, and articles were selected to demonstrate the breadth of available data on pollen counts, allergenicity, and thresholds that induce symptoms in individuals who were sensitized. Additional articles were identified through examination of bibliographies of search-identified articles. Results: Several environmental factors have shown a correlation with pollen counts and allergen load, including the distance from the source, wind characteristics, pollen size, terrain, urban environments, air composition (particulate matter, CO2 levels, ozone, NO2), and weather conditions (humidity, thunderstorms, precipitation). Pollen thresholds at which symptoms were induced varied by study, pollen type, symptom, disease, and location. In addition, there was heterogeneity in study designs, threshold definition, and outcome measures. Conclusion: This scoping review demonstrates the plethora of variables that influence the relationship between pollen and the symptoms of allergic diseases. Analysis of the available data sheds light on the complex interaction between environmental and biologic factors that affect pollen's role in allergic diseases and provides guidance on multiple areas for further investigation.

Objective To evaluate eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) as a biomarker for tissue levels of eosinophilia, cytokines, and chemokines within chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Methods Twenty‐eight subjects undergoing sinonasal surgery were prospectively enrolled. Ethmoid tissue was analyzed with an in‐house EPX immunoassay and a 48‐plex cytokine‐chemokine array. Clinical severity was assessed using SNOT‐22 and Lund‐Mackay scores. Subjects were grouped as follows: controls, polyp status (CRS with [CRSwNP] and without nasal polyps [CRSsNP]), tissue eosinophilia (eosinophilic CRS [eCRS], non‐eosinophilic CRS [neCRS]), or combinations thereof (eCRSwNP, eCRSsNP, neCRSsNP). eCRS was defined as >10 eosinophils per high power field (HPF). Subjects without CRS or asthma were enrolled as controls. Results EPX was elevated in CRSwNP compared to control ( p = 0.007), in eCRS compared to neCRS ( p = 0.002), and in eCRSwNP along with eCRSsNP compared to neCRSsNP ( p = 0.023, p = 0.015, respectively). eCRS displayed elevated IL‐5 compared to neCRS ( p = 0.005). No significant differences in EPX or IL‐5 were observed between eCRSwNP and eCRSsNP. IL‐5 was elevated in eCRSwNP ( p = 0.019) compared neCRSsNP. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.938 (95% CI, 0.835–1.00) for EPX and tissue eosinophilia, with an optimal cut‐point of 470 ng/mL being 100% specific and 81.25% sensitive for tissue eosinophilia. Linear regression revealed a strong correlation between EPX and IL‐5 (R 2 = 0.64, p < 0.001). Comparing EPX and IL‐5, only EPX displayed significant correlation with SNOT‐22 ( p = 0.04) and Lund‐Mackay score ( p = 0.004). Conclusion EPX is associated with tissue eosinophilia in CRS patients regardless of polyp status. EPX correlates with IL‐5 and could be potentially considered a biomarker for anti‐IL‐5 therapies. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope , 134:69–78, 2024

AbstractBackgroundEosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic disease associated with type 2 inflammation and epithelial barrier dysfunction. The etiology is unknown, however, genetic heritability studies suggest environmental factors play a key role in pathogenesis. Detergents, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), are common ingredients in household products such as dish soap and toothpaste. We hypothesized detergent exposure decreases epithelial barrier function and induces esophageal inflammation.MethodsImmortalized esophageal epithelial cells (EPC2) were cultured in air‐liquid interface (ALI) and exposed to SDS. Barrier function/activity was assessed by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), FITC‐dextran flux, and RT‐PCR. Additionally, SDS‐treated mouse esophageal organoids were evaluated for morphology. To investigate the effects of SDS in vivo, mice were treated with 0.5% SDS in drinking water for 14 days. Esophagi were assessed by gross morphology, histopathology, protein expression, and bulk RNA sequencing.ResultsWhen EPC2 cells were exposed to SDS (5 μg/ml) for 96 h, TEER decreased (p = 0.03), and FITC‐dextran flux increased (p = 0.0002). mRNA expression of IL‐33 increased 4.5‐fold (p = 0.02) at 6 h and DSG1 decreased (p < 0.0001) by 72 h. Disrupted epithelial integrity was noted in SDS‐treated esophageal organoids. When mice were exposed to SDS, they showed increased esophageal width, chemokine, and metalloprotease levels. Mice treated with SDS also showed increased IL‐33 protein expression, basal zone hyperplasia, CD4+ cell infiltration, and esophageal eosinophilia. RNA sequencing revealed upregulation of immune response pathway genes.ConclusionExposure to SDS decreases esophageal barrier integrity, stimulates IL‐33 production, and promotes epithelial hyperplasia and tissue eosinophilia. Detergents may be a key environmental trigger in EoE pathogenesis.

BackgroundAsthma and some chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) subtypes are mediated by similar pathophysiologic mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of biologic therapy for asthma on co‐existent CRS in the “real‐world” setting.MethodsA review of electronic health records (2016‐2019) at Mayo Clinic was conducted to identify asthma patients treated with biologics who had co‐existent CRS. Matched‐pair analyses compared pretherapy and posttherapy Lund‐Mackay computed tomography (CT) scores and 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) scores. Performance of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) after initiating biologics was studied.ResultsWe identified 247 patients who received anti‐asthma biologic therapy and had co‐existent CRS. Of these, 181 patients (73.3%) had CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and 66 (26.7%) had CRS without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP). The biologics utilized were omalizumab (51.0%), mepolizumab (46.6%), benralizumab (10.5%), reslizumab (1.6%), and dupilumab (2.4%). Anti‐interleukin‐5 (anti‐IL‐5) intervention was associated with significant improvement in CT scores (CRS overall, CRSwNP subgroup, CRSsNP subgroup) and SNOT‐22 scores (CRS overall, CRSwNP subgroup). Patients on omalizumab had a decrease in CT scores, but not SNOT‐22 scores. ESS was performed in 206 patients (84.1%); 55 (22.3%) underwent surgery post–biologic intervention (anti‐IL‐5: 16.5%; omalizumab 27.8% of patients).ConclusionAnti‐IL‐5 agents were associated with improved CT and SNOT‐22 scores in the overall CRS group and in CRSwNP subgroup; CRSsNP patients showed improved CT scores only. Omalizumab improved CT but not SNOT‐22 scores. ESS was performed in 22% of patients after initiating biologics. These real‐world results may influence future trial designs and clinical applications of biologics for CRS. ©2021 ARSAAOA, LLC.