Back to Authors

Kunkel, Hilary

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 1

Results of Patch Testing to Botanicals: Review of the Mayo Clinic Experience over 2 Decades (1997–2017)
Kumar, Anagha , Jin, Mauricio F. , Kunkel, Hilary, Sathe, Nishad, Hall, Matthew R. , Drage, Lisa A., Youssef, Molly J. , Yang, Yul W. , Yiannias, James A. , Killian, Jill M. , Davis, Mark D.P. , Youssef, Molly, Killian, Jill, Kumar, Anagha Bangalore

Dermatitis® | November 27, 2023 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 43-48

10.1089/derm.2023.0109 Get It

Abstract: Background: Botanicals are increasingly incorporated into skincare products. Although allergic contact dermatitis due to botanicals is recognized, data describing the prevalence of positive patch tests to botanicals are sparse. Objective: To report the Mayo Clinic experience of patch testing to selected botanical products in the standard, extended standard, fragrance, and plant series. Methods: IRB-approved retrospective study of the Mayo Clinic experience with patch testing to botanicals from 1997 to 2017. Results: In total, 12,169 people were patch tested to botanicals in the standard, extended standard, fragrance, and plant series; 4032 were men and 8137 were women. The mean age of the population tested was 54 (standard deviation 17.7) years. Almost 11% (1320/12,169) of the patch-tested population exhibited positive reactions to at least 1 botanical agent. Myroxylon pereirae resin 25% was the most common positive allergen in the series. Patients who had positive reactions to at least 1 botanical agent were more (19.8%) likely to have a positive reaction to at least 1 additional botanical than those patients who did not have any positive tests. Most patients presented with generalized involvement (334) or involvement of the hands (284) or face (232). Conclusion: Physicians should be aware of the high prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis and patch test positivity associated with botanical products.