Abdulsalam, Fatma A. M.

Abstract Introduction The effectiveness of temporary uterine artery ligation (TUAL) in reducing blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is uncertain, despite increased use as an adjunct to improve surgical safety. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TUAL in LM for the management of uterine myomas. Material and Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative studies evaluating LM with and without TUAL. Electronic databases were searched up to October 7, 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials or observational comparative studies published in English that reported at least one primary outcome. The primary outcomes were intraoperative estimated blood loss and perioperative change in hemoglobin. Secondary outcomes included operative time, number and size of myomas removed, length of hospital stay, recurrence, and complication rates. Data extraction and analysis were performed using a random‐effects model. This review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42024595684). Results Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising five randomized controlled trials and two retrospective case–control studies, with a total of 857 women (352 undergoing LM with TUAL and 505 undergoing LM alone). TUAL was associated with a reduction in intraoperative estimated blood loss (mean difference [MD]: −84.7 mL; 95% Cl: −89.0; −80.0) and postoperative reduction in hemoglobin level (MD: −0.4 g/dL; 95% Cl: −0.7; −0.2) compared with LM without TUAL. However, TUAL was associated with increased operative time (MD: 16.5 min; 95% Cl: 3.4; 29.6). Conclusions TUAL appears to be a possible adjunct to LM for selected patients in the management of uterine myomas. Our study demonstrated that TUAL with LM could be associated with a reduction in estimated blood loss, despite an increase in operative time. Nonetheless, further studies with a larger sample size and long‐term follow‐up, as well as stratification of outcomes based on ligation technique, are warranted to elucidate the benefits of TUAL.

Abstract Background Caesarean sections (CSs) constitute a large proportion of fetal deliveries, yet no consensus exists on optimal surgical method. Objectives To investigate the safety and efficacy of the Pfannenstiel‐Kerr method (PKM) in comparison to Misgav‐Ladach method (MLM) and Modified Misgav‐Ladach method (MMLM) for CS. Search Strategy Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, CiNAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to March 2023. Selection Criteria Prospective studies comparing MLM with PKM or MMLM with PKM. Data Collection and Analysis Three authors independently conducted data extraction and assessed quality. Pooled means and proportions were analyzed using inverse variance and Mantel‐Haenszel methods. Main Results Twenty‐seven studies with 15 251 patients, met the selection criteria. Both MLM (mean difference [MD]: −12.09 min, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −14.40, −9.77, Tau 2 = 16.79, I 2 = 97%), (MD: −125.98 mL, 95% CI: −172.13, −79.83, Tau 2 = 3458.59, I 2 = 87%) and MMLM (MD: −11.38 min, 95% CI: −14.72, −8.04, Tau 2 = 30.56, I 2 = 100%), (MD: −62.61 mL, 95% CI: −103.13, −22.09, Tau 2 = 1451.35, I 2 = 92%) demonstrated shorter operative time and decreased blood loss, respectively, compared to PKM. Similarly, both MLM (MD: −1.70 min, 95% CI: −2.26, −1.14, Tau 2 = 0.51, I 2 = 97%), (MD: −0.77 d, 95% CI: −1.35, −0.19, Tau 2 = 0.60, I 2 = 98%) and MMLM (MD: −2.80 min, 95% CI: −3.89, −1.70, Tau 2 = 1.74, I 2 = 100%), (MD: −0.58 d, 95% CI: −1.00, −0.17, Tau 2 = 0.29, I 2 = 100%) demonstrated shorter fetal extraction time and length of hospital stay, respectively, compared to PKM. Conclusions MLM and MMLM should be considered safe and effective alternative approaches to CSs.