Rees, Matthew J.

Introduction: Anti-BCMA CAR-T therapies like idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) have revolutionized RRMM treatment. However, the 6-8-week manufacturing period often leads to disease progression and/or death in up to 25% of patients (pts), necessitating effective bridging strategies. Talquetamab (talq), a bispecific antibody targeting GPRC5D, is approved for RRMM pts with four prior lines of therapy and offers rapid disease debulking without impacting BCMA. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of a short course of talq as a bridging therapy for pts receiving cilta-cel or ide-cel. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study involved 14 US academic medical centers within the US Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. We included pts with RRMM who underwent leukapheresis and received talq bridging therapy with the intent to proceed to commercial cilta-cel or ide-cel. We assessed the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of talq bridging therapy. Safety outcomes included cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), talq-related unique toxicities, and delayed neurotoxicity (NT). Efficacy outcomes included response rates to talq and CAR-T therapies. Results: Between June 2023 and May 2024, 77 pts received talq bridging therapy after apheresis with the intention to proceed to CAR-T. The median age was 66 years (range, 58-73); 14% were Black and 10% Hispanic. Poor prognostic features, including high-risk cytogenetics, were present in 45%, extramedullary disease (EMD) in 43%, and 72.7% were triple-class refractory. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 5 (range 3-11) and 10 pts (13%) had prior BCMA targeted therapy. Out of 77 pts, 10 pts were pending CAR-T infusion at the time of last follow up; 6 pts could not receive CAR-T infusion due to manufacturing failures. Of the remaining 61 patients who underwent successful CAR-T manufacturing, 58 (95%) pts were successfully infused with CAR-T therapy following talq bridging. Three (5%) pts died due to disease progression prior to CAR-T infusion. Talq was given 0.8 mg/kg biweekly in 59 (76%) pts and the median time on talq was 22 days (IQR: 10-41 days). Following talq bridging, none of the pts had grade >=3 CRS and 2 (2.5%) had grade 3 ICANS. Skin toxicities occurred in 32 (41%), nail toxicities in 19 (25%), and oral toxicities in 43 (56%) pts mainly grade 1. Most oral, skin, and taste changes resolved at the last follow-up (60%). Response to talq was evaluable in 72 out of 77 patients. An overall response was noted in 45/72 (62%) pts including unconfirmed CR in 14, VGPR in 10 and PR in 21 pts. There was no association of AEs and response to talq with high-risk cytogenetics, EMD and high baseline ferritin levels. Out of the 58 patients who went on to receive CAR-T therapy following talq bridging (45 cilta-cel and 13 ide-cel), 38 (65%) experienced CRS, with grade 3 CRS noted in 2 (3%) pts. ICANS occurred in 5 (8.6%) pts, with 1 (1.7%) grade 3 ICANS. Only 1 pt had delayed NT (facial nerve palsy) at the last follow up. No treatment related deaths were observed. Of these 58 pts, response was evaluable in 40 pts and a response at day +30 was noted in 39/40 (97.5%) pts (14 in CR, 10 in VGPR, 15 in PR). The median follow-up from CAR-T was 61 days (28-113). For the 58 pts who received CAR-T, the median time from the last talq dose to CAR-T infusion was 25 days (IQR: 19-36), and to lymphodepletion was 24 days (IQR: 18-33). There was no difference in the CAR-T related AEs by the duration of Talq washout (>4 weeks vs. =< 4 weeks). Conclusions: Talquetamab is an excellent bridging option before BCMA-targeted CAR-T therapy, showing high response rates even with short-term use and enabling most pts to receive CAR-T. Most oral, skin, and taste changes resolved post CAR-T. These findings underscore the effectiveness of a short course of talq bridging to maintain disease control and improve outcomes post CAR-T. Updated data with longer follow-up will be presented at the meeting.

7520 Background: There are 2 CAR-T products and 3 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) that are FDA-approved for patients (pts) with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Clinical trials experience to date suggests that clinical response of BsAb is less impacted after CAR-T therapy. We examined the outcome of pts who received BsAb in standard-of-care (SOC) practice at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Methods: Retrospective analysis of MM patients who received FDA-approved BsAb at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 12/2022- 1/2024. IMWG criteria was used for clinical response. Results: Sixty-two patients received BsAbs: 77% (48/62) received teclistamab, and 23% (14/62) received talquetamab. Median age was 62 years (range: 33-81), 60% (37/62) were males, and 45% (28/62) received prior CAR-T. Patients who had prior CAR-T therapy had more prior lines of therapy compared to those who did not. Overall, ORR to teclistamab was 61%, which is comparable to previous studies and other real-world reports. ORR and ≥CR rates were comparable between patients with and without prior CAR-T (Table). Of the 28 pts who received CAR-T before BsAbs, 61% (17/28) received idecabtagene vicleucel, 10% (3/28) were ciltacabtagene autoleucel, and 29% (8/28) on clinical trial. We then compared outcome of BsAb between pts who had relapsed from CAR-T within 1 year (n=21, median PFS: 8.84 months (range, 1.12, 10.84)) or after 1 year (n=7, median PFS: 16.62 months (range, 13.30, 36.20)). At the time of BsAb infusion, pts with who relapsed < 1 year vs ≥1 year post CAR-T had comparable blood counts, ALC, M-protein and involved FLC levels, CRP, ferritin and LDH. BsAb CR/sCR rate was significantly higher in pts with disease relapse ≥1 year compared to <1 year post CAR-T (57% vs 14%, p=0.02). Conclusions: Irrespective of prior CAR-T exposure, BsAb have clinical activity in SOC practice in pts with MM. Our preliminary data suggest that responses to BsAbs are better in pts with late compared to early relapse post CAR-T. Longer follow-up is needed to understand the duration of response. Larger, multi-center studies with longer follow-up will help identify factors that impact BsAb response post CAR-T.[Table: see text]

7516 Background: Immune effector cell hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis IEC-HS is a complication of CAR T cell therapy (CART). This study aims to look at the outcomes of CART patients who develop IEC-HS. Methods: Patients who developed IEC-HS after receiving CART and patients who developed IEC-HS without (nonCART) between December 2020 and March 2022 were included. Results: The 20 CART patients were older than the 25 nonCART patients. Peak ferritin, fibrinogen, CRP, serum creatinine and transaminases were similar between the 2 group. CART patients had lower white blood cell count and platelets and bilirubin than the nonCART patients. CART patients were more like to have markedly elevated IL-6 levels (> 315 mg/ml), higher IL-18, higher MCP-1, and suppressed IL-1β and GMCSF than nonCART patients (Table). Treatment of IEC-HS included tocilizumab (n = 19), anakinra (n = 18) siltuximab (n = 4) and basiliximab (n = 4), dexamethasone (n = 18) methylprednisolone (n = 6), etoposide (n = 1) and ruxolitinib (n = 1). A significant response defined by a 90% reduction or normalization of the cytokine was observed with IL-10 and IFN-ϒ in 92.3% and 84.6% of the CART patients respectively. An intermediate response was noted with TNF, IL-6, MCP-1 and MIP-1 in 38.4%, 30.8% and 61.6% and 38.5% of the patients respectively. No patient had a significant response in IL-2Rα or IL-1β and only 7.7% had a significant response in IL-18. Of the 5 patients who had a MIP-1 response, 4 were on basiliximab +/- high flow continuous venovenous hemofiltration and the only patient that had an IL-18 response was on both modalities. The 100-day mortality after IEC-HS in the CART patients was 40% and was associated with higher peak and lower best ferritin but not the percentage reduction (Table). Higher TNF (90.3 pg/ml vs 37.2 pg/ml, p = 0.05), markedly elevated levels of IL-6 (92% vs 50%, p = 0.03) and IL-10 (33% vs 0%) and an IL-6 response (44.4% vs 0%) were associated with survival at day 100. IL-6 responders had lower peak ferritin vs IL-6 nonresponders (14066 mcg/L vs 45051 mcg/L, p = 0.08). Enterococcus faecium bacteremia developed in 75% of the nonsurvivors vs 16.6% of the 100-day survivors (p = 0.009). Survivors cleared the enterococcus bacteremia within days while nonsurvivors had protracted bacteremia. Conclusions: IEC-HS is devastating complication of CART. Anti-cytokine therapy can reduce some cytokines and ferritin but overimmunosuppression may lead infectious complication, in particular with E. faecium. Better biomarkers are needed to finetune immunosuppressive therapy in order to avoid over-immunosuppression. [Table: see text]

7515 Background: BCMA directed CAR T cells, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), and T cell engagers (TCEs) each have distinct strengths and weaknesses. While these agents have shown unprecedented response rates and survival outcomes, no head-head comparisons exist. We assessed the relative efficacy of different BCMA-therapies in relapsed myeloma, with a focus on high-risk subgroups. Methods: Retrospective study of MM patients treated at Mayo Clinic with commercial or investigational BCMA targeted therapies between April 2018-June 2023. Results: 385 patients (ADC=59, TCE=134, CAR T=192) with a median follow up of 20-months. The median time from diagnosis was 6.1 years. The table shows disease, and treatment characteristics. Amongst ADCs and TCEs recipients, the median treatment duration was 1.9 and 3.5 months respectively, disease progression (64% and 79%) and intolerance (22% and 10%) were the most common reasons for discontinuation. The overall response rates were 27, 50, and 86% for ADCs, TCEs and CAR T, respectively. Compared to ADCs, CAR T was associated with improved PFS (adjusted HRPFS=0.29, 95%CI=0.20-0.43) and OS (aHROS=0.28, 95%CI=0.18-0.44) when adjusting for age, R-ISS, double hit high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs), extramedullary disease (EMD, excluding paraskeletal plasmacytomas), triple class refractoriness, and the number of lines of therapy (LOTs) received in the preceding 1 year. Likewise compared to ADCs, TCEs were associated with superior PFS (aHRPFS=0.59, 95%CI=0.40-0.86) and OS (aHROS=0.60, 95%CI=0.39-0.93). Amongst patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) or EMD at the time of BCMA therapy (n=123), median PFS was poor irrespective of the therapeutic class at 1.3, 1.7 and 6.1 months for ADCs, TCEs and CAR T, respectively. Equally, for patients previously treated with BCMA therapy (n=58), median PFS was poor regardless of class at 1.9, 2.4 and 3 months for ADCs, TCEs and CAR T, respectively. Of 229 relapses the mode of relapse was known in 192 cases (84%), with 101 (52%) having EMD at relapse. Conclusions: While contingent on myriad other factors, patients able to receive BCMA-directed CAR T therapy experience superior survival compared to ADC and TCEs. EMD, PCL and BCMA-exposed populations are recalcitrant to BCMA-directed immunotherapy, and EMD is a common means of relapse. [Table: see text]

7067 Background: High intensity induction with regimens such asDA-EPOCH-R, CODOX-M/IVAC-R and HyperCVAD are often used for young patients with DHL/THL despite no overall survival (OS) benefit compared to R-CHOP. Reports on the application of CODOX-M/IVAC-R are subject to selection bias as only young fit patients can tolerate it. We aimed to investigate outcomes difference between CODOX-M/IVAC-R and DA-EPOCH-R in patients ≤ 60 years with DHL/THL diagnosed via FISH. Methods: Retrospective review of DHL/THL patients from the Mayo Clinic diagnosed between July15th 2010-October19th 2023 treated with CODOX-M/IVAC-R or DA-EPOCH-R at age of up to 60 years. Event free survival (EFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to progression, relapse, next line of treatment or death from any cause. Results: 113 patients were included; CODOX-M/IVAC-R (N=49) and DA-EPOCH-R (N=64). Patient and disease characteristics are in table. 80% (N=39) achieved CR on end of treatment (EOT) PET CT with CODOX-M/IVAC-R compared to only 58% (N=37) with DA-EPOCH-R. CODOX-M/IVAC-R was associated with superior EFS on univariate (HR=0.54, 95%CI=0.31-0.97) and multivariable analysis adjusted for age, BCL2 vs BCL6 translocation and receipt of consolidation ASCT (aHR=0.53, 95%CI=0.29-0.95), however, there was no significant influence on OS (aHR=0.97, 95%CI=0.50-1.91). At a median follow-up of 5.3 years and 3.3 years for the CODOX-M-IVAC and DA-R-EPOCH group respectively; EFS was superior in the CODOX-M/IVAC-R group having 1, 2 and 5 years EFS of 68.3%, 64.1 and 61.5% respectively compared to 52.4%, 48.9% and 39.5% respectively in the DA-EPOCH-R group (p=0.035). 33%(16/49) of the CODOX-M/IVAC-R patients had R/R disease (No CR on EOT PET CT or relapsed) with a median OS of 10.3 months compared to 33.7 months in the R/R DA EPOCH-R group (54%, 35/64). Number of patients who were able to receive salvage ASCT, CAR T and Allo-SCT were 5, 17 and 4 respectively in the DA EPOCH-R group compared to 1, 6 and 3 patients respectively in the CODOX-M/IVAC-R group. None died of regimen toxicity in both groups. 19% underwent ASCT consolidation after CR with initial induction (11 patients in each group); no OS was noticed however consolidation with ASCT was associated with increased EFS regardless of the induction regimen with best outcomes being in the CODOX-M/IVAC-R group (P=0.0072). Conclusions: Our study showed that young patients with DHL/THL who received CODOX-M/IVAC-R had superior EFS compared to DA-EPOCH-R with no OS benefit. CODOX-M/IVAC-R can spare patients receiving more subsequent therapies. Patients who have R/R disease following CODOX-M/IVAC-R have poor outcomes. [Table: see text]

Despite significant improvement in the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with novel therapies, there is still an underserved high-risk (HR) population that experiences early disease progression and death. With the median survival crossing 10 years, we defined ultrahigh-risk (uHR)MM as MM leading to death within 24-36 months of diagnosis and HRMM as MM leading to death within 36-60 months. Several features have emerged as markers of uHRMM: the co-occurrence of two or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, extramedullary disease, plasma cell leukemia and a high-risk gene expression profiling signature. The heterogeneous risk definition across trials, the few trials available designed for HR patients, and the small HR subgroups in all-comers trials make it difficult to generate recommendations with high levels of evidence. Nevertheless, regardless of treatment administered, several studies consistently showed that achieving and maintaining measurable residual disease negativity is now considered the main factor able to mitigate the adverse prognosis related to baseline features. For fit patients with HR transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM, quadruplet induction/consolidation treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors and dexamethasone, and autologous stem-cell transplant and maintenance with, if available, at least a doublet combination could be considered the option of choice. For non-TE NDMM, considering the recent data generated and carefully reviewing those upcoming, quadruplet treatment consisting of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and dexamethasone should also be considered. Future trials integrating BCMA-directed novel generation immunotherapies hold great potential for further advancing the treatment landscape in all NDMM patients with HR disease.

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) exhibits significant heterogeneity in its presentation, genetics, and treatment response. Despite therapeutic advances, some patients continue to relapse early (ER, <18‐months) and rapidly cycle through therapies. Myriad prognostic factors have been identified and incorporated into risk stratification models; however, these produce discordant, often three‐tiered outputs that fail to identify many patients destined for ER. Treatment strategies are increasingly focused on disease biology and trials enriched for high‐risk (HR)MM, but consensus on the minimum required testing and a succinct, specific, and clinically meaningful definition for HRMM remains elusive. We review the risk‐factors, definitions, and future directions for HRMM.