Unni, Uma S.

Abstract Context Higher gluconeogenesis (GNG) contributes to higher nocturnal endogenous glucose production (EGP) in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Studies using 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have confirmed lower hepatic glycogen content in subjects with T2D than in subjects with no diabetes (ND). Objective We determined the role of glycogen loading (GL) vs nonglycogen loading (NGL) on the contribution of GNG to nocturnal EGP in T2D. Methods In total, 14 subjects with T2D and 15 matched subjects with ND were studied on 2 occasions, with GL (60% carbohydrate) vs NGL (40% carbohydrate) isocaloric meals for 3 days, in random order in the overnight state. [6,6-2H2] glucose was infused to measure EGP, deuterium labelled water was used to measure GNG, and 13C MRS scans were performed in fed and fasted states to measure hepatic glycogen content. Results Hepatic glycogen content and nocturnal EGP were higher (P < .05) in GL vs NGL in both cohorts. The % GNG to EGP averaged ∼50% in subjects with ND throughout the night after both meals. In contrast, % GNG to nocturnal EGP in T2D was lower with GL vs NGL and matched the pattern observed in subjects with ND with GL lowering overnight rates of GNG in subjects with T2D. Conclusion Selective targeting of GNG at night with appropriate medications could reduce nocturnal and early morning fasting hyperglycemia and hepatic insulin resistance in people with T2D.

Insulin resistance is highly prevalent in Asian Indians and contributes to worldwide public health problems, including diabetes and related disorders. Surrogate measurements of insulin sensitivity/resistance are used frequently to study Asian Indians, but these are not formally validated in this population. In this study, we compared the ability of simple surrogate indices to accurately predict insulin sensitivity as determined by the reference glucose clamp method. In this cross-sectional study of Asian-Indian men ( n = 70), we used a calibration model to assess the ability of simple surrogate indices for insulin sensitivity [quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA2-IR), fasting insulin-to-glucose ratio (FIGR), and fasting insulin (FI)] to predict an insulin sensitivity index derived from the reference glucose clamp method (SIClamp). Predictive accuracy was assessed by both root mean squared error (RMSE) of prediction as well as leave-one-out cross-validation-type RMSE of prediction (CVPE). QUICKI, FIGR, and FI, but not HOMA2-IR, had modest linear correlations with SIClamp(QUICKI: r = 0.36; FIGR: r = −0.36; FI: r = −0.27; P < 0.05). No significant differences were noted among CVPE or RMSE from any of the surrogate indices when compared with QUICKI. Surrogate measurements of insulin sensitivity/resistance such as QUICKI, FIGR, and FI are easily obtainable in large clinical studies, but these may only be useful as secondary outcome measurements in assessing insulin sensitivity/resistance in clinical studies of Asian Indians.