Iwai, Yoshiko

Abstract There is a large and increasing rate of incarcerated individuals that face a risk of cancer. Cancer is the leading cause of death among the incarcerated population, resulting in a significantly shortened survival rate amongst said population. Very few studies have been conducted to truly assess the knowledge gap between incarceration and cancer outcomes. But, from the few that have been done, like the population-based study done by UF Radiation Oncology assistant professor, Dr. Oladeru, it was discovered that a higher risk of cancer mortality was prevalent in those who were diagnosed with cancer during their time incarcerated as well as one year post release than the general population. My goal and intent with this literature review is to open the conversation about possible ways to bridge the knowledge gap between cancer health disparities amongst incarcerated patients and contribution factors. Citation Format: Tamia Isaacs, Oluwadamilola Oladeru, Jian Li, Yoshiko Iwai. Bridging the gap: A literature review of cancer mortality and incarcerated individuals [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C015.

PURPOSE Despite the disproportionately high risk of breast cancer among women of African heritage, little is known about the facilitators and barriers to implementing germline genetic testing and counseling (GT/C). METHODS This scoping review followed guidelines recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Published manuscripts from database inception through 2021 were sourced from PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature via EBSCO, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Search terms were used to retrieve articles addressing (1) African heritage, (2) breast cancer, and (3) GT or GC. The screening involved abstract and title review and full-text review. Data were extracted for all articles meeting the inclusion criteria. RESULTS A total of 154 studies were included. Most studies that took place were conducted in the United States (71.4%), and most first authors (76.9%) were from the United States. GT was conducted in 73 (49.7%) studies. BRCA1/ BRCA2 were the most commonly studied genes for germline mutations. GC was conducted in 49 studies (33.3%), and perspectives on GC were evaluated in 43 (29.3%). The use of racial/ethnic categories varied broadly, although African American was most common (40.1%). Racism was mentioned in three studies (2.0%). CONCLUSION There is a growing body of literature on GT/C for breast cancer in women of African heritage. Future studies on GT/C of African populations should consider increased clarity around racial/ethnic categorizations, continued community engagement, and intentional processes for informed consent.