Tsubouchi, Toshiro

AbstractBackgroundIn carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) the predominant method of irradiation is raster scanning, called dose driven continuous scanning (DDCS) by Hitachi, allowing for continuous synchrotron extraction. The reduction in irradiation time is highly beneficial in minimizing the impact of patient and target movement on dose distribution. The RF knock out (RFKO) slow‐extraction method is commonly used for beam on/off control. When the Hitachi synchrotron receives a beam off signal the control system stops the RFKO and after some delay time (t‐delay) during which the beam intensity declines, a high‐speed steering magnet (HSST) is used to sweep the remaining beam from isocenter to a beam dump for safety reasons. Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) will use a very short delay of the HSST operation from the RFKO beam OFF signal to minimize the delay time and delayed dose. MCF clinical beam intensity, a tenfold increase over HIMAK, is still less than 100 mMU/ms (approximately 4.9 × 109 pps for 430 MeV/u).PurposeThe rapid beam off control (RBOC) proposed for MCF is associated with the occurrence of flap dose (FD), which refers to the asymmetric shoulder of the spot dose profile formed from the beam bent by HSST deviating from its planned spot position on the isocenter plane. In this study, we quantitatively assessed FD, proposed a treatment planning system (TPS) implementation using a flap spot (FS) and evaluated its impact on dose distribution.MethodThe experiments were conducted at the Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIMAK) varying the t‐delay from 0.01 to 1 ms in a research environment to simulate the MCF RBOC. We studied the dependence of FD position on beam transport and its dependence on energy and beam intensity. FD was generated by delivering 10000 continuous spots on the central axis that are occasionally triggered by an external 10 Hz gate signal. Measurements were conducted using an oscilloscope, and the nozzle's spot position monitor (SPM) and dose monitor (DM).ResultAll spot profile data were corrected for the gain of the SPM's beam intensity dependence. FD was determined by fitting the (SPM) Profile data to a double Gaussian. The position of the FS was found to be transport path dependent, with FS occurring on the opposite sides of the scanning x‐direction for vertical and horizontal ports, respectively, as predicted by transport calculations. It was observed that the FD increases with beam intensity and did not exhibit a significant dependence on energy. The effect of FD on treatment planning is shown to have no significant dose impact on the organs at risk (OARs) near the target for clinical beam intensities and a modest increase for very high intensities.ConclusionUsing HIMAK in research mode the implications are that the FD has no clinical impact on the clinical CIRT beam intensities for MCF and maybe planned for higher intensities by incorporating FS into the TPS to predict the modest increased dose to OARs. A method for commissioning and quality assurance of FD has been proposed.

AbstractBackgroundUsing the pencil beam raster scanning method employed at most carbon beam treatment facilities, spots can be moved without interrupting the beam, allowing for the delivery of a dose between spots (move dose). This technique is also known as Dose‐Driven‐Continuous‐Scanning (DDCS). To minimize its impact on HIMAK patient dosimetry, there's an upper limit to the move dose. Spots within a layer are grouped into sets, or “break points,” allowing continuous irradiation. The beam is turned off when transitioning between sets or at the end of a treatment layer or spill. The control system beam‐off is accomplished by turning off the RF Knockout (RFKO) extraction and after a brief delay the High Speed Steering Magnet (HSST) redirects the beam transport away from isocenter to a beam dump.PurposeThe influence of the move dose and beam on/off control on the dose distribution and irradiation time was evaluated by measurements never before reported and modelled for Hitachi Carbon DDCS.MethodWe conducted fixed‐point and scanning irradiation experiments at three different energies, both with and without breakpoints. For fixed‐point irradiation, we utilized a 2D array detector and an oscilloscope to measure beam intensity over time. The oscilloscope data enabled us to confirm beam‐off and beam‐on timing due to breakpoints, as well as the relative timing of the RFKO signal, HSST signal, and dose monitor (DM) signals. From these measurements, we analyzed and modelled the temporal characteristics of the beam intensity. We also developed a model for the spot shape and amplitude at isocenter occurring after the beam‐off signal which we called flap dose and its dependence on beam intensity. In the case of scanning irradiation, we measured move doses using the 2D array detector and compared these measurements with our model.ResultWe observed that the most dominant time variation of the beam intensity was at 1 kHz and its harmonic frequencies. Our findings revealed that the derived beam intensity cannot reach the preset beam intensity when each spot belongs to different breakpoints. The beam‐off time due to breakpoints was approximately 100 ms, while the beam rise time and fall time (tdecay) were remarkably fast, about 10 ms and 0.2 ms, respectively. Moreover, we measured the time lag (tdelay) of approximately 0.2 ms between the RFKO and HSST signals. Since tdelay ≈ tdecay at HIMAK then the HSST is activated after the residual beam intensity, resulting in essentially zero flap dose at isocenter from the HSST. Our measurements of the move dose demonstrated excellent agreement with the modelled move dose.ConclusionWe conducted the first move dose measurement for a Hitachi Carbon synchrotron, and our findings, considering beam on/off control details, indicate that Hitachi's carbon synchrotron provides a stable beam at HIMAK. Our work suggests that measuring both move dose and flap dose should be part of the commissioning process and possibly using our model in the Treatment Planning System (TPS) for new facilities with treatment delivery control systems with higher beam intensities and faster beam‐off control.