Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall

Objectives The effect of ovarian reserve on expected in vitro fertilisation (IVF) attrition remains controversial. This study analyses IVF attrition rates based on ovarian reserve and stimulation protocol to create customised pre-treatment counselling tools for assisting clinicians in setting accurate patient expectations. Material and Methods We completed a retrospective chart review of 18–44-year-old patients who underwent IVF treatment at a single academic institution between January 1, 2013, and March 23, 2023. Cycle outcomes, number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, fertilised embryos, and blastocysts were analysed for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), unexplained infertility, and diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). A Poisson regression model was used to compare oocyte maturation, fertilisation, and blastulation rates among groups, adjusted for age, body mass index, race, and insemination method. Results Three hundred and thirteen couples underwent a total of 385 IVF cycles analysed in this study. There were 109 patients who underwent 120 cycles in the unexplained infertility group (31% cycles), 133 patients with 143 cycles in the PCOS group (37% cycles), 40 patients with 45 cycles in the DOR antagonist stimulation group (12% cycles), and 39 patients with 77 cycles in the DOR minimal stimulation group (20% cycles). No differences in oocyte maturation, fertilisation, or blastulation rate were seen among PCOS or DOR antagonist cycle groups when compared to unexplained infertility. After adjusting for confounders, blastulation rate was higher for the DOR minimal stimulation group compared to unexplained infertility (1.37-fold change, p = 0.04). Conclusion Rates of oocyte maturation, fertilisation, and blastulation were similar among all antagonist protocol cycles regardless of ovarian reserve. However, patients with DOR who undergo minimal stimulation may have modestly higher blastulation rates compared to DOR patients who undergo the antagonist protocol.

Background: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time-lapse incubators can also utilise morphokinetic models to rank embryos based on morphokinetic parameters. We sought to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. Aims: The aim of the study is to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. Settings and Design: This is a retrospective cohort design. Materials and Methods: Embryos cultured in a time-lapse culture system that had traditional morphologic evaluation, morphokinetic modelling and known live birth outcomes were included in this study. Embryos with unknown competence were excluded, including when two embryos were transferred with a single live birth resulted. Statistical Analysis Used: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for both the morphologic analysis and the morphokinetic model on culture day 3 and day 5. Using the ROC-determined cutoff that optimised both sensitivity and specificity, a binary outcome for each test was analysed using agreement statistics to determine if one method of embryo evaluation was superior to the other. Results: Morphological and morphokinetic grading were both predictive of embryo competence on days 3 and 5. However, on day 3, morphologic grading was superior to morphokinetic grading with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 ( P < 0.001) and 0.58 ( P = 0.009), respectively. Contrarily, on day 5, the morphokinetic model had a higher AUC of 0.65 ( P = 0.03) compared to the morphologic grading, AUC 0.56 ( P = 0.02). Conclusion: Traditional morphology was noted to be a better diagnostic tool (higher AUC) on culture day 3 while a morphokinetic model was superior on day 5.