Back to Authors

Paulitch, Felipe da Silva

Mayo Clinic

From the Heart Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (W.H., H.N.L., A.C.P., A.C.H., P.R.S., D.F., R.D.V., E.G.L., C.L.G., F.d.S.P., L.A.M.C., J.A.F.R.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (B.J.G.)

Citations 1

Five-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Comparison Between Off-Pump and On-Pump Stable Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The MASS III Trial
Hueb, Whady , Lopes, Neuza , Pereira, Alexandre C. , Hueb, Alexandre Ciappina , Soares, Paulo Rogério , Favarato, Desidério , Vieira, Ricardo D’Oliveira , Paulitch, Felipe da Silva, César, Luı́z Antonio Machado , Ramires, José Antônio Franchini , Lima, Eduardo Gomes , Garzillo, Cibele Larrosa , Gersh, Bernard J.

Circulation | September 13, 2010 | Volume: 122 | Issue: 11_suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circulationaha.109.924258 Get It

Background— Coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is a safe, routine procedure. Nevertheless, significant morbidity remains, mostly because of the body’s response to the nonphysiological nature of cardiopulmonary bypass. Few data are available on the effects of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) on cardiac events and long-term clinical outcomes. Methods and Results— In a single-center randomized trial, 308 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned: 155 to OPCAB and 153 to on-pump CAB (ONCAB). Primary composite end points were death, myocardial infarction, further revascularization (surgery or angioplasty), or stroke. After 5-year follow-up, the primary composite end point was not different between groups (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.22; P =0.21). A statistical difference was found between OPCAB and ONCAB groups in the duration of surgery (240±65 versus 300±87.5 minutes; P <0.001), in the length of ICU stay (19.5±17.8 versus 43±17.0 hours; P <0.001), time to extubation (4.6±6.8 versus 9.3±5.7 hours; P <0.001), hospital stay (6±2 versus 9±2 days; P <0.001), higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (35 versus 4% of patients; P <0.001), and blood requirements (31 versus 61% of patients; P <0.001), respectively. The number of grafts per patient was higher in the ONCAB than the OPCAB group (2.97 versus 2.49 grafts/patient; P <0.001). Conclusions— No difference was found between groups in the primary composite end point at 5-years follow-up. Although OPCAB surgery was related to a lower number of grafts and higher episodes of atrial fibrillation, it had no significant implications related to long-term outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN66068876.