Jena, Anek

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use during liver transplantation is a complex and evolving aspect of critical care. This retrospective analysis presents the largest North American case series to date, offering a detailed comparison of survival outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients supported by ECMO. A total of 15 patients were supported with ECMO, eight were supported on venoarterial (VA) ECMO and the remaining seven on venovenous (VV) ECMO. The median duration of ECMO support was 10 days. Mean intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were 34.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–158) and 49.2 days (IQR: 1–121), respectively. Overall survival was 33.3%, comparable to published rates (20–30%). Survival was based on ECMO initiation timing: preoperative 33.3% (1/3); intraoperative 50% (3/6); postoperative, 16.6% (1/6). All the patients (five) discharged from hospital were alive at 1 year follow-up. Significant ECMO-related complications included acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (40%, n = 6/15), neurological complications (40%, n = 6/15), and bleeding requiring transfusion (26.6%, n = 4/15). Literature review suggests better outcomes with intraoperative or postoperative ECMO. While ECMO use is increasing in LT, outcomes remain poor. Improved survival may depend on careful patient selection, optimal timing of initiation, and distinguishing reversible pathology from irreversible one.

Background: Sepsis survivors experience substantial long-term cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. The pooled-cohort atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score estimates 10-year risk in the general population, but its accuracy soon after sepsis is unknown. Objectives: (1) Describe the absolute five-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after sepsis hospitalization. (2) Evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the 10-year ASCVD score for predicting five-year MACE in this setting. Research Questions: The ASCVD score would underpredict five-year MACE in sepsis survivors, reflecting their heightened risk. Methods: We performed a retrospective closed-cohort study using electronic health records from Mayo Clinic hospitals (USA). Adults aged 40–75 years hospitalized for sepsis between 2018 and 2020 were eligible if follow-up was ≥5 years; the age criterion matched the derivation range of the ASCVD score. The primary outcome was five-year MACE—myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, or CV death. Secondly we evaluated the predictive performance of ASCVD score for five-year MACE. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC); calibration with Calibration-in-the-Large (CITL, ideal = 0) and slope (ideal = 1). Performance metrics were calculated in patients with complete ASCVD variables. Results: A total of 6306 sepsis admissions were screened. 2424 patients were excluded for age outside 40–75 years and 879 for <5 year follow-up, leaving 2718 patients for incidence analyses. Median age was 65 years (IQR 56–70); 55 % were male, 38 % required ICU care, and 91 % were White. Median body-mass index was 28.2 kg/m2 (IQR 23.7-34.7). During follow-up, 125 patients (4.6 %) had MI, 219 (8.1 %) experienced stroke, and 303 (11.1 %) died of CV causes; overall, 1573 patients (57.9 %) met the composite MACE outcome. Complete ASCVD data were available for 409 patients. In this subset, discrimination was moderate (AUROC 0.65; 95 % CI 0.59–0.71). Calibration showed CITL +0.34 (95 % CI 0.09–0.59) and slope 0.50 (95 % CI 0.28–0.72), indicating systematic infra-prediction and over-fitting, respectively. Conclusion: Five-year MACE incidence after sepsis is high. The 10-year ASCVD score moderately discriminates but underestimates five-year CV risk in this population, highlighting the need for sepsis-specific predictive models or recalibration to guide targeted post-sepsis cardiovascular prevention.

Introduction: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPBT) and aortic cross-clamp time (AXCT) are independently associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, no universally accepted “optimal” duration exists, as these times are influenced by the complexity of cardiac surgery. ECMO is being increasingly used for cardiogenic shock in patients undergoing cardiotomy, but the impact of CPBT and AXCT on outcomes in this specific population remains unexplored. This study investigates how CPBT and AXCT influence outcomes in cardiotomy patients on ECMO support. Research Question: Do CPBT and AXCT influence mortality and complication rates in cardiotomy patients receiving ECMO support? Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review (Jan 2020–Dec 2024) across a multidisciplinary North American practice, identifying 623 patients who required ECMO. Of these, 236 (37.8%) received ECMO in the preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative period of cardiotomy. Patients were grouped by prolonged CPBT (>150 min) vs standard (≤150 min) and prolonged AXCT (>90 min) vs standard (≤90 min). We analyzed outcomes including 30-day mortality, ECMO characteristics, and postoperative complications. Results: Among the 236 patients, the average age was 60.8 years, BMI 37.43 kg/m 2 ; 63% were male, 85% White. Prolonged CPBT and AXCT were associated with higher BMI (p=0.02, 0.03), prior cardiac surgery (p<0.001, 0.006), and combined CABG+AVR procedures (p=0.01, 0.001). Patients with prolonged durations were more likely to require postoperative ECMO (p=0.001, 0.03). Complications such as mediastinal bleeding, AKI requiring CRRT, mediastinitis, bacteremia, and pneumonia, showed significant association with increased CPBT whereas prolonged AXCT was only linked with mediastinal bleeding. CPBT and AXCT durations did not significantly affect 30-day mortality, ICU/hospital stay, ECMO duration, or ventilation duration. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality included pre-/intraoperative IABP use (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.11–4.30, p=0.023), Impella use (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03–0.75, p=0.040), post-op intracranial bleeding (OR 5.46, 95% CI 1.43–23.9, p=0.016), and CRRT-requiring AKI (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.63–6.57, p<0.001). Conclusion: Prolonged CPBT and AXCT were significantly linked to higher rates of postoperative complications such as mediastinal bleeding, CRRT requiring AKI, mediastinitis, and pneumonia along with increased need for postoperative ECMO support, without significantly affecting mortality.

Heart transplantation is a well-established treatment for end-stage heart failure, but many patients present in poor physical condition, complicating outcomes. The Impella 5.5 device, used in cardiogenic shock, may support pretransplant rehabilitation by stabilizing organ function and promoting functional improvement. This retrospective cohort study assessed the relationship between functional status, measured by standardized Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Basic Mobility (AM-PAC) scores, and days alive outside the hospital within 30 days post-transplant (DAOH-30). Patients who received Impella 5.5 support before transplantation between January 2019 and October 2023 were included, excluding those without AM-PAC scores within 24 hours pretransplant. Among 65 patients, the median DAOH-30 was 15 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8–19). Higher pretransplant standardized AM-PAC scores correlate with increased DAOH-30 (adjusted coefficient 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.6; p = 0.04), as did AM-PAC score improvement during rehabilitation (adjusted coefficient 0.35; 95% CI = 0.01–0.6; p = 0.04). Extended rehabilitation was associated with greater functional gains. These findings suggest that better pretransplant functional status and rehabilitation-related improvements were associated with increased DAOH-30. The Impella 5.5 device facilitates rehabilitation and may enhance post-transplant outcomes. Further research should refine strategies to optimize rehabilitation and recovery in this high-risk population.

Objective The pattern and timing of palliative care utilisation and end-of-life characteristics in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-supported patients remain underused. We wanted to share our centre’s experience. Methods This is an institutional review board-approved retrospective study of 45 patients who underwent ECMO at a large ECMO centre in North America between January 2013 and July 2018. Results Only 28.9% of the ECMO patients received in-hospital palliative care consultation at a median of 18 days (IQR 12–31) after hospitalisation and 10.5 days (IQR 1–28) from ECMO initiation. 1-year mortality was high, with 44% dying during hospitalisation and an additional 13% within the following year. Patients experienced prolonged hospitalisations (median hospital length of stay: 39 days, IQR 19–89) and exhibited high rates of tracheostomy (53%) and renal replacement therapy (60%). Most end-of-life cases involved the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy during ECMO, yet only 53% had a completed living will. Conclusion Our study underscores the need for early initiation of palliative care consultation to enhance symptom management, advance care planning, caregiver support and quality of life for ECMO patients and their families.