Back to Authors

Sullivan, Nancy

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1244-4074

Mayo Clinic

ECRI Institute

Citations 3

2026 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guideline on Perioperative Pain Management Using Local and Regional Analgesia for Cardiothoracic Surgeries, Mastectomy, and Abdominal Surgeries
Joshi, Girish P. , Mariano, Edward R. , Elkassabany, Nabil , Napolitano, Lena M. , Schwartz, Gary , Wyatt-Thompson, Karla E., Burns, Anne, Agarkar, Madhulika, Marbella, Anne, Ramirez, Stephanie, Sullivan, Nancy , Bloschichak, Aaron , Uhl, Stacey , Domino, Karen B., Harbell, Monica, Mariano, Edward R , Harbell, Monica W. , Johnson, Rebecca L. , Li, Jinlei , Suresh, Santhanam , Wyatt, Karla , Ramirez, Stephanie, Sullivan, Nancy, Domino, Karen B.

Anesthesiology | December 9, 2025 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 19-43

10.1097/aln.0000000000005790 Get It

This practice guideline addresses perioperative pain management using local and regional anesthesia for cardiothoracic, mastectomy, and abdominal surgery in adults and children. For adults, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (Schaumburg, Illinois) Task Force on Perioperative Pain Management strongly recommends fascial plane blocks to reduce pain and/or opioid requirements in the first 24 h postoperatively for open cardiothoracic, abdominal, retroperitoneal, and pelvic surgeries and mastectomy. Fascial plane blocks are also recommended in adults to reduce pain and/or opioid requirements after minimally invasive abdominal procedures. The Task Force conditionally recommends use of fascial plane blocks for minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgeries and open hernia repair to reduce pain in the first 24 h postoperatively. For children, the Task Force strongly recommends use of fascial plane blocks to reduce pain/and or opioid use after open cardiac or thoracic surgeries. Fascial plane blocks are conditionally recommended to reduce pain the first 24 h in children undergoing open hernia repair. Overall, data analysis for this practice guideline was limited by low methodologic quality, inconsistencies in outcome measurements, and small sample sizes from individual centers. Future research in regional anesthesia and analgesia needs to address these pervasive limitations.
2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate‐to‐Severe Osteoarthritis or Ad
Goodman, Susan M. , Yates, Adolph J. , Baker, Joshua F. , Bass, Phyllis, Bekele, Delamo I. , Dass, Danielle, Jevsevar, David S. , Suleiman, Linda I. , Wolfstadt, Jesse , Bartosiak, Kimberly , Cohen‐Rosenblum, Anna , Courtney, P. Maxwell , Ghosh, Nilasha , Mehta, Bella , Rana, Adam J. , Sullivan, Nancy , Turgunbaev, Marat, Wysham, Katherine D. , Yip, Kevin , Yue, Linda, Zywiel, Michael G. , Russell, Linda , Turner, Amy S. , Goodman, Susan M , Baker, Joshua F , Bekele, Delamo , Ghomrawi, Hassan M K , Kwoh, Chian Kent , Bedard, Nicholas A. , Ghosh, Nilasha , King, Lauren K , Meara, Alexa Simon , Wysham, Katherine D , Turner, Amy S , Hannon, Charles P. , Austin, Matthew S. , Guyatt, Gordon , Aggarwal, Vinay Kumar , Ghomrawi, Hassan , Lajam, Claudette M. , Meng, Charis F. , Moreland, Larry W. , Blevins, Jason L. , Fernandez‐Ruiz, Ruth , Gausden, Elizabeth B. , Mirza, Reza Donald , Singh, Jasvinder A.

Arthritis & Rheumatology | September 25, 2023 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1877-1888

10.1002/art.42630 Get It

ObjectiveTo develop evidence‐based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient‐important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate‐to‐severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA).MethodsWe developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations.ResultsThe panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality.ConclusionThis guideline provides evidence‐based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate‐to‐severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient‐important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.
2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate‐to‐Severe Osteoarthritis or Ad
Goodman, Susan M. , Yates, Adolph J. , Baker, Joshua F. , Bass, Phyllis, Bekele, Delamo I. , Dass, Danielle, Jevsevar, David S. , Suleiman, Linda I. , Wolfstadt, Jesse , Bartosiak, Kimberly , Cohen‐Rosenblum, Anna , Courtney, P. Maxwell , Ghosh, Nilasha , Mehta, Bella , Rana, Adam J. , Sullivan, Nancy , Turgunbaev, Marat, Wysham, Katherine D. , Yip, Kevin , Yue, Linda, Zywiel, Michael G. , Russell, Linda , Turner, Amy S. , Goodman, Susan M , Baker, Joshua F , Bekele, Delamo , Ghomrawi, Hassan M K , Kwoh, Chian Kent , Bedard, Nicholas A. , Ghosh, Nilasha , King, Lauren K , Meara, Alexa Simon , Wysham, Katherine D , Turner, Amy S , Hannon, Charles P. , Austin, Matthew S. , Guyatt, Gordon , Aggarwal, Vinay Kumar , Dass, Danielle, Ghomrawi, Hassan , Lajam, Claudette M. , Meng, Charis F. , Moreland, Larry W. , Blevins, Jason L. , Fernandez‐Ruiz, Ruth , Gausden, Elizabeth B. , Mirza, Reza Donald , Singh, Jasvinder A.

Arthritis Care & Research | September 25, 2023 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2227-2238

10.1002/acr.25175 Get It

ObjectiveTo develop evidence‐based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient‐important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate‐to‐severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA).MethodsWe developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations.ResultsThe panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality.ConclusionThis guideline provides evidence‐based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate‐to‐severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient‐important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.