Khealani, Milan

e20012 Background: PM 2.5, particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less, is a major contributor to lung cancer and associated mortality. Epidemiological studies reveal a concerning trend, with each 10 micrograms per cubic meter increase in PM 2.5 associated with a 15% higher risk of lung cancer and a 13% increase in mortality rates, underscoring the significant burden it imposes on public health systems globally. We aimed to evaluate the odds of association between environmental exposure to PM 2.5 and the risk of lung cancer and associated mortality. Methods: We performed a systematic review and umbrella meta-analysis using studies containing quantitative data on PM 2.5 and lung cancer. We used PRISMA guidelines and the MOOSE protocol using PubMed and MeSH terms like PM 2.5, non-small cell cancer, lung cancer, pollutants, particulate matter 2.5, and environmental factors. We had excluded non-full-length articles, non-meta-analysis studies, and non-human studies. RavMan 5.4 was used, and generic inverse variance methods with mixed effect models were applied to identify a pooled risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Forest plots were obtained, and sensitivity analysis was performed based on funnel plots and I2 (heterogeneity) values. Results: Of the 245,529 articles evaluated for the quality of the data, 99 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Out of 99, we used six articles to derive the quantitative data. In umbrella meta-analysis, PM 2.5 exposure was associated with a 1.16 times higher risk (95%CI: 1.1-1.22, p<0.00001, I2=0%) of lung cancer and a 1.22 times higher risk of non-lung cancers (95%CI: 1.15-1.30, p<0.00001, I2=0%). PM 2.5 was associated with non-significant higher mortality (RR: 1.06, 95%CI: 0.99-1.13, p=0.09, I2=97%) with leave-on-out analysis (excluding Chen et al.) significant association between mortality and PM 2.5 (RR: 1.08, 95%CI: 1.06-1.10, p<0.00001, I2=0%). Conclusions: Our umbrella meta-analysis shows a significant risk of lung cancer and mortality from PM 2.5 exposure. Further investigation and increased consciousness are necessary to mitigate the risk of lung cancer associated with this pollutant.

Abstract Importance: Severe gender gap in academic research output is pervasive across all medical specialties, including hematology and oncology. Objective: This bibliometric study aimed to investigate the representation of females in premier first and last authorship positions of hematology- and oncology-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000–2022. Additionally, we investigated the trend of females in first authorship positions with a male or female senior author. Design: Bibliometric analysis of clinically oriented hematology and oncology RCTs published between 2000 and 2022 across all PubMed-indexed journals. Participants: First and last authors of 5,891 hematology- and oncology-related RCTs. Main Outcomes: Change in the proportion of female first and senior authors and the proportion of RCTs with the same and cross-gender dyads of first and senior authors. Results: 5,891 RCTs were available with identifiable gender of first and senior authors. A total of 49 countries and 62 journals were represented in our study sample. The proportion of females in our study population was 22.9% (n = 1,349) in the first authorship and 17.5% (n = 1,032) in the senior authorship positions and were predominantly affiliated with institutions in high-income countries (94.1%, n = 1,270 and 95.3%, n = 984). We also noted a significant upward trend in the percentage of female authors in the first authorship position (16.3% in 2000 to 32.4% in 2022, p = 0.001) between 2000 and 2022; the trend was stronger with male than female senior authors. However, the odds of the females in the first authorship position with a female senior author were significantly higher only when both authors came from high-income countries [OR = 1.702 (95%CI 1.461–1.984; p < 0.0001]. The proportion of female senior authors remained stable during the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite early trends in closing the gender gap in the authorship of hematology- and oncology-related RCTs, females remain severely underrepresented in premier authorship positions. The increasing proportion of female authors in the first authorship position with a male senior author indicated that a more inclusive effort to train, mentor, and encourage young female physician-scientists with the involvement of senior male and female researchers will likely accelerate the overall increase in female authorship.

Background: Both valvular heart disease (VHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist. AF is an important cause of arrhythmias with a definitive cardiovascular morbidity. The use of either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs/warfarin) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (also known as new oral anticoagulants (NOACs)) has been the mainstay for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with VHD and/or AF, and this has been broadly discussed. However, there are limited studies on anticoagulation therapy for patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (VAF). The main aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcomes (stroke–vascular events and intracranial bleeding) following DOAC and VKA treatment amongst patients with VAF. Methods: We identified clinical trials and observational studies published in the last 10 years. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with valvular atrial fibrillation following DOAC vs. VKA treatment. Data evaluation was performed using Review Manager 5.4; the endpoints were stroke–vascular events and intracranial bleeding following DOAC and VKA treatment amongst VAF patients. Risk ratios (RR) were evaluated with 95% confidence intervals. Using random effects models, forest plots were obtained. Heterogeneity was assessed by using the I2 statistic. Results: Eight studies were included in this metanalysis, and a total of fifteen thousand two hundred and fifteen patients (DOAC (8732) and VKA (6483)) were pooled. We found a significant risk reduction in stroke–vascular events when using DOACs in comparison with using VKAs (pooled RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64–0.90, p = 0.002). A total of 14862 patients (DOAC (8561) and VKA (6301)) were pooled from a total of six studies for intracranial bleeding. We found a significant risk reduction in terms of intracranial bleeding when using DOACs in comparison with using VKAs (pooled RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.24–0.77, p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: When compared to VKAs, DOAC agents were found to have less risk of stroke–vascular events and intracranial bleeding. Further prospective studies are essential to establish the efficacy and safety of DOAC agents in patients with various subtypes of VAF.