McGurren, Daniel

Objective The aim of the study was to assess the interrater reliability between seven individuals assessing quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area, echo intensity, and corrected echo intensity. Design A retrospective subanalysis of data collected in a randomized controlled clinical trial (IRB 19-008473. NCT ID NCT04302558). Patients aged 13–50 yrs with an anterior cruciate ligament tear requiring surgical reconstruction were assessed for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris, vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and vastus medialis obliquis, and echo intensity of the rectus femoris. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the quadriceps was performed by one physical therapist, and quantitative assessments were performed by four physicians and three physical therapists. Results Physicians and physical therapists had good reliability for cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (median interclass correlation 0.86 doctor of medicine (MD) and 0.84 physical therapist), cross-sectional area of the vastus medialis obliquis (0.82 and 0.82), and echo intensity mean (0.92 and 0.92). Rectus femoris cross-sectional area had the smallest coefficient of variation (26.512.7%), whereas subcutaneous fat had the largest coefficient of variation (93.3% left, 86.4% middle, 86.1% right). Conclusions These findings demonstrate reliability between physicians and physical therapists in interpretation of ultrasound images of the quadriceps. The inconsistency demonstrates the need for a consistent training across disciplines to ensure accurate image interpretation.

AbstractThis case involves a healthy male with painful lateral knee pain and snapping after a hyperextension injury. Initially, this was felt to be from a displaced lateral meniscus tear; however, he failed to improve after meniscal debridement. Further workup with an ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging identified an aberrant biceps femoris anatomy. He was taken to the operating room and the aberrant slip was identified. A tenodesis of the aberrant slip to the biceps femoris was completed. This resolved the patient's pain and snapping, and he was able to return to all activities.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of low-intensity blood flow restriction (LI- BFR) training utilized in a pre-rehabilitative setting for patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on postoperative outcomes by minimizing postoperative atrophy and impairment of the quadriceps. We hypothesize that postoperative strength and hypertrophy of the quadriceps will be greater in a population that undergoes preoperative LI-BFR training than that of a population that undergoes low-intensity sham control (LI-SHAM) training. Methods: Twenty-eight subjects undergoing primary ACLR underwent 2 weeks of either a BFR intervention or a SHAM intervention at a rate of 2 sessions per week before surgery. Quadriceps strength and cross-sectional area were measured as well as other exploratory outcomes were measured before and after the intervention before surgery and at 5 different time points after surgery, through 6 months postoperative. Quadriceps strength was assessed through handheld dynamometry and a leg press test and quadriceps cross-sectional area was assessed using musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging. Results: Adjusting for sex, time, and strength/hypertrophy at baseline, there were no significant differences found between treatment groups for the primary endpoints. Compared to 24-48 hours pre- op, this suggests that the post-op average hypertrophy remains significantly lower through 24 weeks post-op, while leg strength is similar at 24 weeks post-op as measured by handheld dynamometer and even significantly larger at 24 weeks as measured by the leg press test. Conclusions: A 2-week preoperative program of LI-BFR training may not be effective to improve postoperative quadriceps strength and hypertrophy after ACLR.