Roger, Véronique L.

Background: Prevention strategies for Alzheimer’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease related dementias (AD/ADRDs) are urgently needed for reducing incidence. Intra-patient variability in lipid levels is a potentially modifiable risk factor for incident AD/ADRD. Although regular lipid measurements are a part of common clinical practice and longitudinal data routinely available in electronic health records (EHR), research examining this association between AD/ADRD and lipid variability across multiple lipid types remains scarce. Methods: All residents living in Olmsted County, MN on 1/1/2006 age ≥60 years without an AD/ADRD diagnosis were identified using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services diagnostic codes. Persons with ≥3 lipid measurements (total cholesterol or triglycerides) in the 5 years prior to index date were retained. Lipid variability was quantified using variability independent of the mean (VIM). Models were adjusted for traditional risk factors. Associations between lipid variability quintiles and incident AD/ADRD were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Multiple imputation was used for missing covariates. Participants were followed through 2018 for incident AD/ADRD. Results: The final analysis included data on 11,551 participants with total cholesterol and 11,502 participants with triglycerides. Participants had a mean age of 71 (range 60-99) years, and were primarily white (96%). Females (54%) were also slightly more frequent than males. Median follow up was 12.9 years (range: 0-13). Participants in the highest quintile of variability for total cholesterol and triglycerides had a 20% increased risk of incident AD/ADRD. Similar results were found in the subset with complete covariate data. Conclusion: In a large EHR derived cohort, persons in the highest quintile of lipid variation had an increased risk of incident AD/ADRD. Further studies to identify the mechanisms behind this risk factor and replication of these results across a more diverse population are needed.

Background: Larger within-patient variability of lipid levels has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, measures of lipid variability are not currently used clinically. We investigated the feasibility of calculating lipid variability within a large electronic health record (EHR)-based population cohort and assessed associations with incident CVD. Methods: We identified all individuals ≥40 years of age who resided in Olmsted County, MN on 1/1/2006 (index date) without prior CVD. CVD was defined as myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention or stroke. Patients with ≥3 measurements of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and/or triglycerides during the 5 years before the index date were retained in the analyses. Lipid variability was calculated using variability independent of the mean (VIM). Patients were followed through 9/30/2017 for incident CVD (including CVD death). Cox regression was used to investigate the association between quintiles of lipid VIMs and incident CVD. Results: We identified 18,642 individuals (mean age 60; 55% female) who were free of CVD at baseline and VIM calculated for at least one lipid measurement. After adjustment, those in the highest VIM quintiles of total cholesterol had a 25% increased risk of CVD (Q5 vs. Q1 HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08-1.45; Table). We observed similar results for LDL-C (Q5 vs. Q1 HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39) and HDL-C (Q5 vs. Q1 HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09-1.43). There was no association between triglyceride variability quintiles and CVD risk. Conclusion: In a large EHR-based population cohort, high variability in total cholesterol, HDL-C and LDL-C was associated with an increased risk of CVD, independently of traditional risk factors, suggesting it may be a target for intervention. Lipid variability can be calculated in the EHR environment but more research is needed to determine its clinical utility.

Background: Multimorbidity is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), yet comorbidity patterns are not well documented. Methods: The prevalence of 18 chronic conditions was obtained in patients with AF from 2013-2017 from a 27-county region in the Midwest. All patients had AF documented on an electrocardiogram or Holter monitor. To compare comorbidity patterns between patients with and without AF, controls were matched 1:1 on age (± 5 years) and sex. For AF patients and controls separately, the Somers’ D statistic was used to quantify the non-random concordance of each pair of chronic conditions beyond chance (ranging from -1 [perfect disagreement] to 1 [perfect agreement]; 0 indicating coincidental agreement by chance alone). Significance of the Somers’ D statistic was evaluated using a permutation approach with the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for controlling the false discovery rate at 0.1%. Results: Among the 16,543 patients with AF (median age 76 years, 57% men), the most common conditions were hypertension (70%), hyperlipidemia (61%), arthritis (41%), and diabetes (40%). Many pairs of chronic conditions co-occurred more frequently than expected. However, no material differences were observed in the co-occurrence of conditions in patients with AF compared to controls (data not shown). Among patients with AF, the co-occurrence of conditions differed by age (Figure). In those ≤65 years, the strongest co-occurrence of conditions was depression/anxiety, although several condition pairs had Somers’ D statistics of >0.4. In those aged 65-74 years, hypertension/hyperlipidemia and depression/anxiety had the strongest co-occurrence, whereas hypertension/hyperlipidemia was strongest for those aged ≥75 years. Conclusion: Although differences in the co-occurrence of conditions did not exist between AF and community controls, among the patients with AF, the patterns of co-existing conditions differed by age. A better understanding of the clinical consequences of multimorbidity in AF patients is needed.

Designated as an emerging epidemic in 1997, heart failure (HF) remains a major clinical and public health problem. This review focuses on the most recent studies identified by searching the Medline database for publications with the subject headings HF, epidemiology, prevalence, incidence, trends between 2010 and present. Publications relevant to epidemiology and population sciences were retained for discussion in this review after reviewing abstracts for relevance to these topics. Studies of the epidemiology of HF over the past decade have improved our understanding of the HF syndrome and of its complexity. Data suggest that the incidence of HF is mostly flat or declining but that the burden of mortality and hospitalization remains mostly unabated despite significant ongoing efforts to treat and manage HF. The evolution of the case mix of HF continues to be characterized by an increasing proportion of cases with preserved ejection fraction, for which established effective treatments are mostly lacking. Major disparities in the occurrence, presentation, and outcome of HF persist particularly among younger Black men and women. These disturbing trends reflect the complexity of the HF syndrome, the insufficient mechanistic understanding of its various manifestations and presentations and the challenges of its management as a chronic disease, often integrated within a context of aging and multimorbidity. Emerging risk factors including omics science offer the promise of discovering new mechanistic pathways that lead to HF. Holistic management approaches must recognize HF as a syndemic and foster the implementation of multidisciplinary approaches to address major contributors to the persisting burden of HF including multimorbidity, aging, and social determinants of health.

Introduction: Relationship of QOL and frailty are poorly defined. Hypothesis: To study the prevalence and prognosis of poor QOL in frail patients. Methods: Predismissal standardized tests for frailty and QOL in 2 cohorts were administered. In cohort 1, 629 patients ≥ 65 years underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2005-2008, frailty (Fried) and QOL [SF-36 and SAQ] were ascertained. Cohort 2 [921 patients, 535 PCI, ≥55 years] underwent cardiac catheterization from 2014-18, frailty (Rockwood) and QOL (Likert) were determined. Results: In cohort 1, 19%; and 20% in cohort 2 were frail. Lower median SAQ (58.9 vs. 82.2); physical (29.5 vs. 43.9) and mental (49.2 vs. 57.4) scores of SF-36 in cohort 1 higher rates of fair/poor health (56% vs 18%) in cohort 2 (all comparisons, p<0.001) was seen in frail patients. As compared to without, frail patients were 5 times more likely (59% vs. 11%, p<0.001) in cohort 1 and 7 times more likely (56% vs. 8%) in cohort 2 to have poor QOL. Adjusted three year all-cause death and death/myocardial infarction (MI) was significantly higher for patients undergoing PCI with frailty; [HR (95% CI) death, 4.20 (2.63, 6.68) and death or MI HR 2.72 (1.91, 3.87), p<0.001) and with poor QOL [HR death 2.47 (1.59, 3.84) and death or MI 1.61 (1.16, 2.24) p<0.001). There was no significant interaction between frailty and QOL (p=0.64) indicating their independent prognostic influence. Conclusions: Poor QOL is commonly seen with frailty. Both frailty and poor QOL had significant and independent association with long-term survival.

More than 40 years after the 1978 Bethesda Conference on the Declining Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease provided the scientific community with a blueprint for systematic analysis to understand declining rates of coronary heart disease, there are indications the decline has ended or even reversed despite advances in our knowledge about the condition and treatment. Recent data show a more complex situation, with mortality rates for overall cardiovascular disease, including coronary heart disease and stroke, decelerating, whereas those for heart failure are increasing. To mark the 40th anniversary of the Bethesda Conference, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association cosponsored the “Bending the Curve in Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Bethesda + 40” symposium. The objective was to examine the immediate and long-term outcomes of the 1978 conference and understand the current environment. Symposium themes included trends and future projections in cardiovascular disease (in the United States and internationally), the evolving obesity and diabetes epidemics, and harnessing emerging and innovative opportunities to preserve and promote cardiovascular health and prevent cardiovascular disease. In addition, participant-led discussion explored the challenges and barriers in promoting cardiovascular health across the lifespan and established a potential framework for observational research and interventions that would begin in early childhood (or ideally in utero). This report summarizes the relevant research, policy, and practice opportunities discussed at the symposium.

Background Prior reports indicate that living in a rural area may be associated with worse health outcomes. However, data on rurality and heart failure (HF) outcomes are scarce. Methods and Results Residents from 6 southeastern Minnesota counties with a first‐ever code for HF ( International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ ICD‐9 ], code 428, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ ICD‐10 ] code I50) between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016, were identified. Resident address was classified according to the rural‐urban commuting area codes. Rurality was defined as living in a nonmetropolitan area. Cox regression was used to analyze the association between living in a rural versus urban area and death; Andersen‐Gill models were used for hospitalization and emergency department visits. Among 6003 patients with HF (mean age 74 years, 48% women), 43% lived in a rural area. Rural patients were older and had a lower educational attainment and less comorbidity compared with patients living in urban areas ( P <0.001). After a mean (SD) follow‐up of 2.8 (1.7) years, 2440 deaths, 20 506 emergency department visits, and 11 311 hospitalizations occurred. After adjustment, rurality was independently associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09–1.29) and a reduced risk of emergency department visits (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.97) and hospitalizations (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73–0.84). Conclusions Among patients with HF, living in a rural area is associated with an increased risk of death and fewer emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Further study to identify and address the mechanisms through which rural residence influences mortality and healthcare utilization in HF is needed in order to reduce disparities in rural health.

Objective: To determine whether a bi-directional relationship exists between depression and HF within a single population of individuals receiving primary care services, using longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs). Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized EHRs for adults who received primary care services within a large healthcare system in 2006. Validated EHR-based algorithms identified 10,649 people with depression (depression cohort) and 5,911 people with HF (HF cohort) between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2018. Each person with depression or HF was matched 1:1 with an unaffected referent on age, sex, and outpatient service use. Each cohort (with their matched referents) was followed up electronically to identify newly diagnosed HF (in the depression cohort) and depression (in the HF cohort) that occurred after the index diagnosis of depression or HF, respectively. The risks of these outcomes were compared (vs. referents) using marginal Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for 16 comorbid chronic conditions. Results: 2,024 occurrences of newly diagnosed HF were observed in the depression cohort and 944 occurrences of newly diagnosed depression were observed in the HF cohort over approximately 4–6 years of follow-up. People with depression had significantly increased risk for developing newly diagnosed HF (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.89–2.28) and people with HF had a significantly increased risk of newly diagnosed depression (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17–1.54) after adjusting for all 16 comorbid chronic conditions. Conclusion: These results provide evidence of a bi-directional relationship between depression and HF independently of age, sex, and multimorbidity from chronic illnesses.

AbstractThe purpose of this analysis was to develop and validate computable phenotypes for heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using claims‐type measures using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. This retrospective study utilized an existing cohort of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents aged ≥ 20 years diagnosed with HF between 2007 and 2015. The gold standard definition of HFpEF included meeting the validated Framingham criteria for HF and having an LVEF ≥ 50%. Computable phenotypes of claims‐type data elements (including ICD‐9/ICD‐10 diagnostic codes and lab test codes) both individually and in combinations were assessed via sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with respect to the gold standard. In the Framingham‐validated cohort, 2,035 patients had HF; 1,172 (58%) had HFpEF. One in‐patient or two out‐patient diagnosis codes of ICD‐9 428.3X or ICD‐10 I50.3X had 46% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 84% PPV, and 54% NPV. The addition of a BNP/NT‐proBNP test code reduced sensitivity to 35% while increasing specificity to 91% (PPV = 84%, NPV = 51%). Broadening the diagnostic codes to ICD‐9 428.0, 428.3X, and 428.9/ICD‐10 I50.3X and I50.9 increased sensitivity at the expense of decreasing specificity (diagnostic code‐only model: 87% sensitivity, 8% specificity, 56% PPV, 30% NPV; diagnostic code and BNP lab code model: 61% sensitivity, 43% specificity, 60% PPV, 45% NPV). In an analysis conducted to mimic real‐world use of the computable phenotypes, any one in‐patient or out‐patient code of ICD‐9 428/ICD‐10 150 among the broader population (N = 3,755) resulted in lower PPV values compared with the Framingham cohort. However, one in‐patient or two out‐patient instances of ICD‐9 428.0, 428.9, or 428.3X/ICD‐10 150.3X or 150.9 brought the PPV values from the two cohorts closer together. While some misclassification remains, the computable phenotypes defined here may be used in claims databases to identify HFpEF patients and to gain a greater understanding of the characteristics of patients with HFpEF.