Killian, Jill M.

Abstract Background We aimed to investigate the prevalence of skin disease among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and determine whether LE skin disease had clinical or serologic correlates with SLE. Methods We reviewed records of 335 patients with SLE (seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA) and abstracted skin manifestations, fulfilled mucocutaneous SLE criteria, and clinical and serologic parameters. Results Of the 231 patients with skin manifestations, 57 (24.7%) had LE‐specific conditions, 102 (44.2%) had LE‐nonspecific conditions, and 72 (31.2%) had both. LE skin disease was associated with photosensitivity, anti‐Smith antibodies, and anti‐U1RNP antibodies (all P < 0.001). Patients without LE skin disease more commonly had elevated C‐reactive protein levels ( P = 0.01). Patients meeting 2–4 mucocutaneous American College of Rheumatology criteria less commonly had cytopenia ( P = 0.004) or anti−double‐stranded DNA antibodies ( P = 0.004). No significant associations were observed for systemic involvement (renal, hematologic, neurologic, and arthritis) when comparing patients with or without LE skin involvement. LE skin involvement was not significantly associated with internal SLE disease flare, number of medications, or overall survival. Conclusions LE skin disease commonly occurs in patients with SLE. The presence of LE skin disease had no mitigating impact on the severity of SLE sequelae, disease flares, number of medications, or overall survival.

Abstract Background Multimorbidity and functional limitation are associated with poor outcomes in heart failure (HF). However, the individual and combined effect of these on health‐related quality of life in patients with HF is not well understood. Methods Patients aged ≥30 years with two or more HF diagnostic codes and one or more HF‐related prescription drugs from four U.S. institutions were mailed a survey to measure patient‐centric factors including functional status (activities of daily living [ADLs]) and health‐related quality of life (PROMIS‐29 Health Profile). Patients with HF from January 1, 2013 to February 1, 2018 were included. Multimorbidity was defined as ≥2 non‐cardiovascular comorbidities; functional limitation as any limitation in at least one of eight ADLs. Patients were categorized into four groups by multimorbidity (Yes/No) and functional limitation (Yes/No). We dichotomized the PROMIS‐29 sub‐scale scores at the median and calculated odd ratios for the four multimorbidity/functional limitation groups. Results A total of 3330 patients with HF returned the survey (response rate 31%); 3020 completed the questions of interest and were retained. Among these patients (45% female; mean age 73 [standard deviation: 12] years), 29% had neither multimorbidity nor functional limitation, 24% had multimorbidity only, 22% had functional limitation only, and 25% had both. After adjustment, having functional limitation only was associated with higher anxiety (odds ratio [OR]: 3.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.66–4.45), depression (OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 2.39–4.06), and fatigue (OR: 4.19, 95% CI: 3.25–5.40); worse sleep (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.69–2.72) and pain (OR: 6.73, 95% CI: 5.15–8.78); and greater difficulty with social activities (OR: 9.40, 95% CI: 7.19–12.28) compared with having neither. Results were similar for having both multimorbidity and functional limitation. Conclusion Patients with only functional limitation have similar poor health‐related quality of life scores as those with both multimorbidity and functional limitation, underscoring the important role that physical functioning plays in the well‐being of patients with HF.

Background Clinical risk scores are used to identify those at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite preventative efforts, residual risk remains for many individuals. Very low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL‐C) and lipid discordance could be contributors to the residual risk of ASCVD. Methods and Results Cardiovascular disease–free residents, aged ≥40 years, living in Olmsted County, Minnesota, were identified through the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) and VLDL‐C were estimated from clinically ordered lipid panels using the Sampson equation. Participants were categorized into concordant and discordant lipid pairings based on clinical cut points. Rates of incident ASCVD, including percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, or myocardial infarction, were calculated during follow‐up. The association of LDL‐C and VLDL‐C with ASCVD was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Interaction between LDL‐C and VLDL‐C was assessed. The study population (n=39 098) was primarily White race (94%) and female sex (57%), with a mean age of 54 years. VLDL‐C (per 10‐mg/dL increase) was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident ASCVD (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.05–1.09]; P <0.001]) after adjustment for traditional risk factors. The interaction between LDL‐C and VLDL‐C was not statistically significant ( P =0.11). Discordant individuals with high VLDL‐C and low LDL‐C experienced the highest rate of incident ASCVD events, 16.9 per 1000 person‐years, during follow‐up. Conclusions VLDL‐C and lipid discordance are associated with a greater risk of ASCVD and can be estimated from clinically ordered lipid panels to improve ASCVD risk assessment.

Introduction: The epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) differs in women and men. However, it is not well defined whether these differences extend to the subgroup of patients that develop advanced HF or if they translate to differences in outcomes. Aim: To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of advanced HF in women and men. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota with advanced HF (as defined by European Society of Cardiology Criteria) from 2007-2017. Differences in survival and hospitalization risks following advanced HF development in women and men were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression and Andersen Gill models, respectively. Results: Of 936 individuals with advanced HF, 417 (44.6%) were women and 519 (55.4%) were men. Women were older (mean 79 vs 75 years) with a lower overall comorbidity burden (Charlson comorbidity index 4.7 vs 5.2), less often had coronary artery disease (60% vs 79%) and hyperlipidemia (69% vs 77%), but more often had hypertension (91% vs 87%) and depression (32% vs 24%), and more often had advanced HF with preserved ejection fraction (60% vs. 30%) compared with men ( p<0.05 for each). After adjustment for age, ejection fraction and comorbidities, there were no differences in risks of survival or hospitalizations ( Figure ) between women and men (p> 0.10 for each). Conclusion: While advanced HF can occur in both women and men, their phenotypes differ; women more often present with advanced HFpEF and men with more atherosclerotic disease and advanced HFrEF. Despite these differences, survival is similar in women and men with advanced HF.

Abstract: Background: Botanicals are increasingly incorporated into skincare products. Although allergic contact dermatitis due to botanicals is recognized, data describing the prevalence of positive patch tests to botanicals are sparse. Objective: To report the Mayo Clinic experience of patch testing to selected botanical products in the standard, extended standard, fragrance, and plant series. Methods: IRB-approved retrospective study of the Mayo Clinic experience with patch testing to botanicals from 1997 to 2017. Results: In total, 12,169 people were patch tested to botanicals in the standard, extended standard, fragrance, and plant series; 4032 were men and 8137 were women. The mean age of the population tested was 54 (standard deviation 17.7) years. Almost 11% (1320/12,169) of the patch-tested population exhibited positive reactions to at least 1 botanical agent. Myroxylon pereirae resin 25% was the most common positive allergen in the series. Patients who had positive reactions to at least 1 botanical agent were more (19.8%) likely to have a positive reaction to at least 1 additional botanical than those patients who did not have any positive tests. Most patients presented with generalized involvement (334) or involvement of the hands (284) or face (232). Conclusion: Physicians should be aware of the high prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis and patch test positivity associated with botanical products.

Background Heart failure (HF) is a complex disease that contributes to a high number of hospitalizations, deaths, and economic health care costs each year. However, among patients with HF, there is a lack of awareness of their HF diagnosis that has not been fully examined. Methods and Results Residents from 3 counties of southeast Minnesota with a first‐ever International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision ( ICD‐9 ) code 428 or Tenth Revision ( ICD‐10 ) code I50 between January 1, 2013 and March 31, 2016 (N=2461) were prospectively surveyed to measure HF self‐awareness. A total of 1114 patients returned the survey (response rate, 45%), and 787 had validated HF upon medical record review. Among these 787 patients with HF (mean age, 76 years; 53% men), 37% (n=293) were aware of their HF diagnosis. After adjustment, being a woman (odds ratio [OR], 1.56 [95% CI, 1.10–2.22]), having HF with reduced ejection fraction (OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.13–2.22]), attending the HF clinic (OR, 4.07 [95% CI, 2.25–7.36]), and having coronary artery disease (OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.16–2.37]) were all associated with increased awareness of an HF diagnosis. Conversely, having diabetes was associated with decreased awareness of an HF diagnosis (adjusted OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50–0.95]). Conclusions Awareness of an HF diagnosis is low in a community population of patients with HF. Strategies to improve patient awareness of their diagnosis should be implemented to improve self‐care behaviors and outcomes in patients with HF.

Background: Multimorbidity is common in atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly among older patients who generally have multiple cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular chronic conditions. However, less is known about the accumulation of chronic conditions in younger patients with AF. Methods: Patients aged <65 with incident AF from 2013-2019 from a 27-county region in the Midwest (N=4907) were matched 1:1 on age (±5 years) and sex to referents from the same community. The index date for the matched pair was the date of first diagnosis of AF. Diagnosis of 20 other chronic conditions was ascertained from 3 years prior to index through 12/31/2022. Mean cumulative function curves were used to visualize the accumulation of conditions; Andersen-Gill models estimated associations between AF/referent status and accumulation of conditions. Results: The mean age was 55 years for both patients with AF and matched referents; 71% were male. In the 3 years leading up to AF diagnosis, only 4% of patients with AF had no additional chronic conditions and 69% had ≥3 chronic conditions. In contrast, 35% of referents had 0 and 32% had ≥3 chronic conditions. The accumulation of chronic conditions was accelerated in patients with AF compared to referents prior to AF diagnosis/index (Figure). After index, patients with AF had increased accumulation of chronic conditions (HR (95% CI): 1.93 (1.71-2.20), 1.82 (1.62-2.05), 1.68 (1.55-1.83), and 1.53 (1.44-1.64) for ages <50, 50-54, 55-59, and 60-64 years, respectively). After 1 year, the differences were attenuated in all age groups with no difference observed between patients with AF and referents in the oldest age group (1.26 (1.08-1.46), 1.28 (1.11-1.47), 1.13 (1.02-1.24), and 1.05 (0.97-1.13) for ages <50, 50-54, 55-59, and 60-64 years). Conclusion: Patients <65 years with AF have an increased accumulation of chronic conditions compared to those without AF, in particular prior to their AF diagnosis and within the first year after AF diagnosis.