Rouse, Rachelle

Purpose: Advances in targeted therapeutics for histiocytic neoplasms have led to a growing survivor population, especially for Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), and Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD). This growing population is at risk of adverse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as a result of the disease or treatments received. Patient-reported outcomes in this population remain understudied, and we aim to define their HRQoL using a validated tool. Methods: We enrolled patients from 2 histiocytosis centers and an international conference from Aug 2022-April 2023 to complete the PROMIS © (Patient-Reported Outcomes [PROs] Measurement Information System) 29+2 profile v2.1, which captures 8 domains of physical/mental health and functioning. Domains are reported as T-scores, with 50 being the general population mean. We calculated summary T-scores for Physical Health (PH) and Mental Health (MH), and differences of 3 from general population were considered clinically meaningful. We then used these T-scores to calculate each patient's PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) score, which is a health-utility score that measures overall HRQoL. A mean PROPr score difference of 0.4 from the US population mean of 0.52 was considered meaningful. We ran independent-samples t-tests to examine differences in PH/MH summary scores and PROPr between sub-cohorts. Finally, we performed a multinomial logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with worse scores, and calculated odds ratios (OR) for each factor. Results: We included a total of 77 participants. Specific diagnoses included ECD (n=33, 42.9%), LCH (n=21, 27.3%), RDD (n=19, 24.7%), and other/unknown (n=4, 5.2%). Median age at diagnosis was 50y (9-79) and at survey was 54y (18-82), with a median 4 year difference between diagnosis and survey completion. Racial demographics included white (n=64, 83.1%), Black (n=12, 15.6%), and Asian (n=1, 1.3%). 4 patients (5.2%) identified as having a Hispanic ethnicity. Disease extent included unifocal (n=13, 16.9%), single system multifocal (ss-M, n=8, 10.4%), single system lung LCH (ss-L, n=3, 3.9%), or multisystem (n=53, 68.8%) disease. The most commonly involved organs included bone (n=44, 57.1%), kidney (n=24, 31.2%), skin (n=24, 31.2%), CNS (n=24, 31.2%), and pituitary (n=19, 24.7%). PH and MH summary scores were lower in various diagnostic categories as compared with the US population, and PROPr scores were reduced in all diagnostic categories. Bone involvement was associated with worse PH (-6.16, 95%CI -10.81, -1.52, [p=0.005]), MH (-7.96, 95%CI -12.48, -3.44, [p=<0.001]), and PROPr (-0.184, 95%CI -0.313, -0.056, [p=0.003]) scores. CNS involvement was associated with worse PH (-4.78, 95%CI -9.14, -0.42, [p=0.016]). We initially constructed a multinomial regression model using diagnosis, race, age at survey completion, and CNS and bone involvement. This model was not statistically significant, and in particular, diagnosis and age did not significantly contribute to the model. We then removed diagnosis and age and constructed a new model using the remaining variables, which was statistically significant for all 3 scores (p<0.05). We found that factors associated with worse PH score were disease involvement of bone (OR=6.19, 95%CI 1.88, 20.43 [p=0.003]) and CNS (OR=10.36, 95%CI 2.01, 53.39 [p=0.005] Figure 2). Factors associated with worse MH scores included female sex (OR=4.12, 95%CI 1.24, 13.66 [p=0.021]) and CNS involvement (OR=10.74, 95%CI 2.47, 46.79 [p=0.002]). Having race/ethnic group other than white/Non-Hispanic or Black was associated with improved MH. However, as this group had only 4 members, the significance of this is uncertain. Finally, CNS involvement was found to be associated with worse odds of having a low PROPr score (OR=10.46, 95%CI 2.17, 50.37 [p=0.003]). Conclusions: Several PROs were worse in patients with histiocytic neoplasms as compared with the general population. We further found that CNS involvement was independently associated with worse HRQoL, regardless of the diagnosis type. Additionally, female sex was associated with worse MH scores, and bone involvement with worse PH scores. PROPr score was particularly low among patients with ECD. Future research is warranted to assess the impact of treatments on HRQoL, as well as the economic loss resulting from loss of productivity as highlighted by low PROPr scores.

Background: Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (WAIHA) is mostly IgG mediated (IgG+C3-), which may at times fix complement (IgG+C3+). Whether the clinical outcome of complement-fixing (C3+) WAIHA is different from that of non-complement fixing (C3-) WAIHA remains unclear. The goal of this retrospective study was to describe and compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with C3+ and C3- WAIHA. Methods: We included adult WAIHA patients seen at our institution from 2001-2023 who met all of the following criteria: A) age >18 years; B) direct antiglobulin test [DAT] IgG+ + C3+ with no cold agglutinin; and C) biochemical evidence of hemolysis. Response to treatment was based on the international consensus criteria: complete (CR; normal Hb or Hb ≥12 g/dL, with resolution of hemolysis); partial (PR; Hb >10 but <12 g/dL or Hgb >12 g/dL without resolution of hemolysis); or no response (neither CR nor PR). 223 WAIHA patients were found, and 132 patients were ultimately included. The most common reason for exclusion was a lack of complete DAT that included C3 testing. Results: There were 59 patients with C3- WAIHA and 73 patients with C3+ WAIHA, reflecting 44.7% and 55.3% of total patients respectively. Pertinent demographic, clinical, and treatment information are shown in Table 1. Slightly over half (52.3%) were males and the mean age (SD) was 63.9 years (18.1). Concomitant lymphoproliferative disease was present in 34.1% of the patients. The 3 most common treatments were steroids (97%), rituximab (66.7%), and splenectomy (18.2%). The median follow-up from diagnosis was 20.0 months (range, 1.0-251.8 months), and 14.4% of patients had died at the time of this analysis with no difference between the groups (P=0.82). There was no significant difference in the demographic composition, clinical findings, and treatment received in both groups. The number of treatments received were similar between C3- and C3+ WAIHA groups (Table 1). After first line of treatment, response was achieved in 86.4% and 94.4% of the C3- and C3+ groups (P=0.12), respectively. Additionally, 62.7% of the C3- group and 80.8% of the C3+ group were in PR or CR by their most recent CBC (P=0.02). 33.9% and 43.8% of the C3- and C3+ groups relapsed at least once (P=0.25). In those who relapsed, there was an average of 2.6 relapse events in the C3- WAIHA group compared to 1.8 relapse events in the C3+ WAIHA group (P=0.03). However, there was no difference in time to first relapse between the groups (P=0.51), shown in Figure 1. Conclusion: There have been retrospective descriptions of multiple AIHA subtypes and response rates to different therapies; however, this is one of the first studies to our knowledge to focus specifically on outcomes between complement subgroups. In our large group of patients with C3- and C3+ WAIHA, the clinical presentation, treatments utilized, and response to treatment were similar. Our data suggest that C3- and C3+ WAIHA can be approached and treated similarly.

101 Background: In the US, minority patients are underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is due to multiple factors, including socioeconomic barriers, limited medical insurance coverage and restrictive clinical trial eligibility, e.g., ANC cutoff. For the latter, conservative ANC cutoff disadvantages Black patients. Two-in-three Black individuals have a Duffy-null phenotype, that is associated with lower ANC with 5% prevalence of ANC <1,500 cells/µl. To improve Black patient accrual to cancer clinical trials, lowering the ANC cutoff was proposed as a potential solution over a decade ago. Its implementation is not known. This study evaluates the ANC cutoff values as part of the eligibility criteria for cancer clinical trials. Methods: We accessed the Clinicaltrials.gov website on 5/25/2023 and obtained the ANC cutoff of cancer clinical trials conducted in the US. We included adult therapeutic trials in the phases of recruiting, not yet recruiting, enrolling by invitation, and active-not yet recruiting. Trials with drug interventions were selected. Those focusing on surgical, behavioral, nutritional and radiotherapeutic interventions were excluded. All ANC cutoff values were converted to “cells/µl” for analysis. Results: A total of 911 trials were evaluated, and 470 met the eligibility criteria. Of the 470 trials, 366 (78%) involved solid malignancies, and 104 (22%) involved hematologic malignancies. Hematologic trials have significantly lower ANC cutoffs compared to solid tumor trials with median ANC cutoff of 1,000 (range, 250-2000) vs. 1,500 (range 250-3,000); p=<0.001. In all, 323 trials (68.7%) required patients to have ANC >1,500, and 116 trials (24.6%), primarily hematologic, required patients to have ANC >1,000. For myeloma and prostate cancer, two cancers with higher incidence among Blacks, 12.9% and 86.4% of the trials require ANC >1,500, respectively. All genitourinary, breast, head & neck, sarcoma, lung, skin, and neuroendocrine tumor trials excluded patients with ANC <1,000. Conclusions: Most hematologic malignancy trials have a more liberal ANC cutoff allowing patients with ANC <1,500 to participate. However, solid tumor trials remain more conservative, with 4 in 5 trials requiring an ANC cutoff of >1,500. A strict ANC cutoff remains a barrier to minority accrual.[Table: see text]