Back to Authors

McEleney, Mark

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Health System

Citations 1

Remote Synchronous Laceration Repair Instruction With Summary Feedback
Boswell, Christopher L. , Cowan, K, Furlano, Anthony, McEleney, Mark, Morcomb, Erin F., Tookey, Christopher J., Stacey, Stephen K , Cowan, Karen K, Furlano, Anthony J, McEleney, Mark D, Cowan, Karen K.

PRiMER | June 29, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22454/primer.2023.863182 Get It

Background and Objectives: Social distancing and quarantine requirements imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote training in many learning situations that formerly focused on traditional in-person training. In this context, we developed an adaptive approach to teaching laceration repair remotely while allowing for synchronous instruction and feedback. Methods: In April 2020, 35 family medicine residents from 4 programs in the Midwest United States participated in a real-time, remotely-delivered, 2-hour virtual procedure workshop of instruction in suture techniques for laceration repair. Paired-sample t tests compared scores of learner self-confidence obtained during pre- and posttests. We interpreted short-answer responses with a mixed-methods analysis. Residents submitted photos and videos of suture techniques and received formative feedback based on a predefined rubric. Results: All residents completed the pre- and posttests. The posttest scores for self-confidence across the participants showed significant improvement for all suture techniques. Of the 67 short-answer responses, 38 responses (56.7%) were positive; 9 (13.4%) negative; 8 (11.9%) neutral; and 12 (17.9%) a combination of positive and negative. The workshop was rated by 34 residents (97.1%) as either “about the same as prior training experiences,” “better than prior training experiences,” or “much better than prior training experiences.” Conclusion: Learners reported that a remotely-delivered, real-time, synchronous suture technique workshop was a valuable experience. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy of this platform to promote procedural competence.