Chuang, David Chwei‐Chin

Background: Variable terminology is used in the literature to describe facial synkinesis and hypertonicity following incomplete recovery from facial paralysis and its associated medical and surgical treatments. Study Objectives: Establish a nomenclature consensus for this condition among a group of facial nerve experts. Design Type: Consensus study. Methods: Using modified Delphi methodology, an international, multidisciplinary group of facial nerve experts reviewed the terminology for the name of the clinical condition and treatments of interest. Online surveys and a virtual discussion were performed to establish consensus, defined a priori as agreement by 80% of the group. Results: Twenty-five facial nerve experts established consensus after three Delphi rounds. Consensus terminology for the condition is “facial synkinesis” with 84% agreement. Medical treatment is termed “chemodenervation” with 100% agreement. Surgical treatments including “selective facial neurectomy,” “selective facial neurotomy,” “selective facial myectomy,” and “selective facial myotomy,” were defined and reached agreement of 100%. Conclusions: This international group of facial nerve experts has recommended standardized nomenclature for the condition of facial synkinesis and its various treatments. While “facial synkinesis” reached consensus as the preferred term, some experts noted it may insufficiently describe the full clinical spectrum, which includes muscle hypertonicity, weakness, and spontaneous twitching.

Background: Complete brachial plexus injuries are devastating injuries. A viable C5 spinal nerve can offer additional sources of axons and alter surgical treatment. We aimed to determine factors that portend C5 nerve root avulsion. Methods: A retrospective study of 200 consecutive patients with complete brachial plexus injuries at two international centers (Mayo Clinic in the United States and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan) was performed. Demographic information, concomitant injuries, mechanism, and details of the injury were determined, and kinetic energy (KE) and Injury Severity Score were calculated. C5 nerve root was evaluated by preoperative imaging, intraoperative exploration, and/or intraoperative neuromonitoring. A spinal nerve was considered viable if it was grafted during surgery. Results: Complete five-nerve root avulsions of the brachial plexus were present in 62% of US and 43% of Taiwanese patients, which was significantly different. Increasing age, the time from injury to surgery, weight, body mass index of patient, motor vehicle accident, KE, Injury Severity Score, and presence of vascular injury significantly increased the risk of C5 avulsion. Motorcycle (≤150cc) or bicycle accident decreased the risk of avulsion. Significant differences were found between demographic variables between the two institutions: age of injury, body mass index, time to surgery, vehicle type, speed of injury, KE, Injury Severity Score, and presence of vascular injury. Conclusions: The rate of complete avulsion injury was high in both centers. Although there are a number of demographic differences between the United States and Taiwan, overall the KE of the accident increased the risk of C5 avulsion.