Pruzin, Jeremy J.

Abstract Background Apolipoprotein E (APOE), the major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), has three common alleles (2, 3 and 4), giving rise to genotypes that are associated with six levels of AD risk: (2/2<2/3<3/3<2/4<3/4<4/4). In our new Arizona APOE Cohort Study, we have begun to establish a longitudinal cohort of more than 300 cognitively unimpaired persons (50‐90 year‐old) stratified by APOE genotype and age decile, matched by age and sex, and have an extensive battery of cognitive, clinical, amyloid (NAV4694) and tau (MK6240) PET, MRI, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), plasma, and DNA. The study is intended to clarify the impact of APOE4 and APOE2 allelic dose on the predisposition to and protection from AD and inform the design of secondary and primary prevention therapies. Here, we describe the study and the resource of data and samples that are now available to researchers. Methods Participants were recruited from across the United States using GeneMatch and other sources. Comprehensive clinical assessments, brain images, and lumbar punctures are performed every 2 years, 50mL blood samples are acquired annually, and whole genome sequencing is in progress. Results As of January 2025, baseline assessments were completed in 303 participants, 68±9 years of age, including 205 females and 98 males. Sixteen percent are from underrepresented groups. Baseline CSF samples were obtained in 89% of the participants. The complete cohort consists of 17, 63, 41, 65, 66, and 51 persons with the APOE 2/2, 2/3, 3/3, 2/4, 3/4, and 4/4 genotype, respectively. In the first 287 participants with available amyloid PET scans 6% of 2/2, 5% of 2/3, 14% of 3/3, 26% of 2/4, 29% of 3/4, and 52% of 4/4 participants had a positive amyloid PET (≥20 centiloids). Conclusions Building up on our decades of experience in APOE research, we launched the new Arizona APOE Cohort which promises to provide a valuable resource of data and samples to advance the study of APOE, its variants and interactions with other risk and protective factors, and the development, treatment, and prevention of AD. Baseline data are now available to interested and eligible research collaborators.

AbstractBackgroundPhysical activity is associated with reduced risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Aerobic exercise produced modest‐to‐moderate cognitive gains in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia. In animal models, aerobic exercise modifies AD’s AT(N) biomarkers of Amyloid‐beta (Aβ), hyperphosphorylated Tau, and Neurodegeneration. However, most observational studies didn’t find significant associations between physical activity and AT(N) biomarkers. Few exercise trials included biomarkers, partially attributable to the prohibitive cost and invasiveness of cerebrospinal fluid or PET biomarkers and reported mixed effects on central AT(N) biomarkers. Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, phosphorylated tau 181 (p‐tau181), and total tau (t‐tau) demonstrate robust correlations with central amyloid and tau levels and offer an opportunity for inclusion in exercise trials.MethodThis pilot study examined the preliminary effects of 6‐month aerobic exercise on plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, p‐tau181, and t‐tau in older adults with mild‐to‐moderate AD dementia. Twenty‐six participants were eligible, and all consented to enroll (8 in stretching, 18 in cycling). Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, p‐tau181, and t‐tau were measured using Simoa™ assays at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Data were analyzed using Cohen’s d, multilevel model, and intention‐to‐treat.ResultThe sample averaged 77.58±6.99 years old, 15.44±3.00 years of education, 65% male, and 96.2% carrying an APOE e4 allele. The 6‐month within‐group trajectories of changes in outcomes trended differently but were not statistically significant. Aβ42/40 ratio (mean ± standard deviation) increased by 0.001±0.012, p‐tau181 increased by 0.609±1.417 pg/ml, and t‐tau decreased by 0.020±0.279 ng/ml in the stretching group, while Aβ42/40 ratio decreased by 0.001±0.010, p‐tau181 increased by 0.101±1.579 pg/ml, and t‐tau decreased by 0.075±0.215 pg/ml in the cycling group. Between‐group differences were not significant. Effect sizes for 6‐month within‐group changes were small except for p‐tau181 in stretching (d = 0.43 [‐.65, 1.45]) and t‐tau in cycling (‐0.35 [‐0.87, 0.17]). Most 6‐month between‐group effect sizes were also small except for p‐tau181 (d = .40 [‐.70, 1.51]) and t‐tau (d = .53 [‐.40, 1.46]), a trend favoring cycling.ConclusionBlood biomarkers are highly feasible and tolerable. Exercise modalities may affect AD plasma biomarkers differently. Aerobic exercise may reduce p‐tau181 levels and stretching exercise may improve Aβ42/40 ratio, which need to be validated in future trials.