Johnson, Lynne A

Abstract Aims To test whether an index based on the combination of demographics and body volumes obtained with a multisensor 3D body volume (3D-BV) scanner and biplane imaging using a mobile application (myBVI®) will reliably predict the severity and presence of metabolic syndrome (MS). Methods and results We enrolled 1280 consecutive subjects who completed study protocol measurements, including 3D-BV and myBVI®. Body volumes and demographics were screened using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator to select features associated with an MS severity score and prevalence. We randomly selected 80% of the subjects to train the models, and performance was assessed in 20% of the remaining observations and externally validated on 133 volunteers who prospectively underwent myBVI® measurements. The mean ± SD age was 43.7 ± 12.2 years, 63.7% were women, body mass index (BMI) was 28.2 ± 6.2 kg/m2, and 30.2% had MS and an MS severity z-score of −0.2 ± 0.9. Features β coefficients equal to zero were removed from the model, and 14 were included in the final model and used to calculate the body volume index (BVI), demonstrating an area under the receiving operating curve (AUC) of 0.83 in the validation set. The myBVI® cohort had a mean age of 33 ± 10.3 years, 61% of whom were women, 10.5% MS, an average MS severity z-score of −0.8, and an AUC of 0.88. Conclusion The described BVI model was associated with an increased severity and prevalence of MS compared with BMI and waist-to-hip ratio. Validation of the BVI had excellent performance when using myBVI®. This model could serve as a powerful screening tool for identifying MS.

Background: The body Mass Index (BMI) is commonly used in clinical practice to screen for obesity and resulting cardiometabolic conditions. Nonetheless, BMI has limited utility as it cannot differentiate body fat (BF). Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that BF content measured by air displacement plethysmography (Bod-Pod®) had a stronger association with prevalent hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM) and dyslipidemia (DLP) when compared to BMI. Methods: We performed a community-based cross-sectional study on adults attending an employee wellness center from January 2007-December 2011 who had had a body composition assessment with Bod-Pod®. We excluded subjects with history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke at baseline. The prevalence of HTN, DM and DLP was assessed across quartiles of BF% and BMI categories. Their association with BF% and BMI was evaluated using linear regression models that adjusted for age, sex, and white race. Results: We included 3,052 individuals; 68 % were women, and the mean age ± SD was 42.09±12.8, BMI was 27.9±6.2; BF% 31.88±10.69, 892 (29.2%) were obese by BMI. Cardiometabolic conditions were prevalent in 496 (16.2%) with HTN, 378 (12.4%) with DM and 743 (24.4%) with DLP. While the prevalence of DM, HTN and DLP increased across BF% quartiles (all p for linearity>0.01), this was not always the case across BMI categories (p for linearity<0.05 for HTN and DLP, and 0.04 for DM) see Figure A . Elevated BF %, better identified individuals with HTN (AUC 0.766 vs 0.625; p<0.001), DM (AUC 0.643 vs. 0.568; p<0.001), DLP (AUC 0.758 vs. 0.593; p<0.001). Conclusion: BF content is better associated with a higher prevalence of HTN, DM, and DLP. Highlighting the role of body composition assessment in primary prevention. Dyslipidemia.