Sciubba, Daniel M.

OBJECTIVE While traditional literature in adult spinal deformity (ASD) examining mechanical complications has focused on proximal junctional kyphosis and failure, distal junctional failure (DJF) of constructs ending at the sacrum with or without spinopelvic fixation remains less explored. The current study sought to 1) propose a new DJF classification with a panel of experienced deformity surgeons, and 2) analyze intra- and interreliability of the novel classification. METHODS A prior review study was completed that identified all types of distal complications for lumbosacral fusions. A panel of 25 experienced spinal deformity surgeons used a modified Delphi approach with three rounds of review to create a classification system. Ten deformity surgeons then reviewed a representative series of 14 de-identified cases to assess the interrater reliability of the classification system using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A second round of review was conducted by each investigator to determine intrarater reliability using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. RESULTS Complications were classified as acute (< 90 days from the date of surgery) or chronic (≥ 3 months from the date of surgery). Acute failures included mechanical failure of the screws or screw-rod interface, such as pelvic set plug dissociation, tulip head dissociation, and fracture of the pelvic screw at any point along its trajectory. Fractures of the rod (proximal vs distal to S1) and distal bony anatomy (sacrum vs pelvis) were included, as was failure of the offset connector. Chronic failures also consisted of pseudarthrosis at distal levels, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain, screw halo formation, and painful screw prominence. The intrarater and interrater reliability were both high with Cohen’s kappa of 0.91 and an ICC of 0.98, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These data provide a comprehensive and systematic classification scheme of distal complications following long-segment ASD fusion to the sacrum. This new paradigm will allow for more detailed and consistent reporting of distal junctional complications following spinopelvic fusion, with or without supplemental pelvic fixation and/or concomitant SIJ fusion. This classification scheme resulted in high intra- and interrater reliability.

OBJECTIVE Surgery is typically indicated for mechanical pain in metastatic spine disease or severe neurological compromise, but how radicular pain responds to oncological treatment is not well described. The primary aim of this study was to describe how radicular pain responds to oncological treatment, while secondary aims included pain outcomes between patients with mechanical and tumoral pain and motor improvement in patients with weakness due to nerve root compression. METHODS Patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy for spinal metastases were identified from an international multicenter prospective cohort. The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain at 3 months posttreatment. Motor recovery from radicular compression in patients with myotomic weakness and low-grade epidural compression was also analyzed. RESULTS Of 284 patients, 129 (45%) had radicular pain ± axial pain and 155 (55%) had axial pain alone. The two groups did not significantly differ in age, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, or treatment. Two hundred two patients (71%) underwent surgery ± radiotherapy, whereas 82 (29%) had radiotherapy alone. The NRS score of patients with radicular pain improved from 6.7 to 3.4 at 3 months, a statistically significantly higher magnitude than in patients with isolated axial pain (p = 0.021). The NRS score at 3 months was similar for both groups (p = 0.876). Patients with radicular pain experienced a larger improvement with surgery compared with radiotherapy alone (p = 0.007) but had higher pretreatment pain (mean NRS score 7.0 vs 5.6, p = 0.013). Twenty-three patients identified with radicular/myotomic weakness (mean American Spinal Injury Association score 96.3 ± 3.2) at baseline improved 2.1 ± 3.8 points at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS The magnitude of pain improvement for patients with radicular pain following surgery and radiotherapy for metastatic spine disease is higher than for patients with axial pain alone. Surgery is associated with a larger improvement in radicular pain than radiotherapy alone. These results will allow clinicians to tailor treatment options for patients with metastatic spine disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a comprehensive assessment of frailty for predicting neurosurgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess whether frailty, measured by a modified RAI (mRAI), was an independent predictor of adverse events (AEs), nonroutine discharge (NRD), and in-hospital mortality for patients with acute cervical spinal cord injuries (SCIs). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs database. Adult patients with acute cervical SCI from 2016 to 2022 were stratified by mRAI score into 3 groups: Robust (mRAI 0-10), Frail (mRAI 11-20), and Very Frail (mRAI ≥21). Patient demographics, comorbidities, injury type, diagnostic and treatment modality, AEs, and in-hospital mortality were assessed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of AEs, NRD, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 71 048 patients were stratified by mRAI score: 59 796 Robust (84.2%), 9558 Frail (13.5%), and 1694 Very Frail (2.4%). The proportion of SCIs secondary to a fall (Robust: 44.1% vs Frail: 70.2% vs Very Frail: 82.3%; P < .001) and AEs (Robust: 21.5% vs Frail: 24.4% vs Very Frail: 25.0%; P < .001) significantly increased with frailty. Very Frail patients experienced higher NRDs (Robust: 72.3% vs Frail: 85.2% vs Very Frail: 91.0%; P < .001) and in-hospital mortality (Robust: 10.9% vs Frail: 18.3% vs Very Frail: 29.2%; P < .001). On multivariate regression analysis, both Frail (odds ratio [OR]: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.25-1.61; P < .001) and Very Frail (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.46-2.99; P < .001) mRAI scores predicted NRD, but only Frail mRAI score (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.05-1.21; P = .001) was significantly associated with AEs. In addition, Frail (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.36-1.65; P < .001) and Very Frail (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 2.36-3.29; P < .001) mRAI scores were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that mRAI may be used to assess morbidity and mortality in patients presenting with spinal cord injury.

Study Design Narrative Review. Objectives To summarize the work of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, specifically studies from the Epidemiology, Process and Outcomes in Spine Oncology (EPOSO) study. Methods A narrative review of all published manuscripts from the EPOSO study was undertaken. EPOSO represents a multicenter, prospective registry effort across 10 North American and European sites to enroll patients with metastatic disease of the spine. Results The current review summarized all studies from the EPOSO network, divided into the following five sections: (1) quality of life and satisfaction, (2) overall survival, (3) spinal instability, (4) neurologic outcome in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression or radicular pain, and (5) patient and tumor-specific factors. Several important findings were elucidated. Patient evaluation should include SINS, nutritional status, severity and duration of neurologic deficit, extent of metastatic tumor burden, and differentiation of axial from radicular pain. Moreover, SOSGOQ2.0 serves as a useful and validated instrument for patient-reported outcome instrument. Despite the palliative nature of metastatic spine surgery, clear improvement in quality-of-life is seen. Even in patients with short-survival, the remaining weeks and months of life result in improved quality-of-life. Metastatic spine surgery often improves neurologic function, potentially enhancing survival through increased performance status. Conclusions Several noteworthy results have come from the EPOSO network, highlighting important trends in metastatic spine care. The AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor has helped advancing metastatic spine tumor research as well as ensure these new findings reach and benefit clinicians and their patients.

OBJECTIVE Management of locally invasive colorectal carcinoma at any stage currently involves surgical excision followed by chemoradiotherapy; however, the prognosis is poor, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of only 5%. Failure to achieve gross-total resection is associated with poorer OS, and patients with residual tumor postresection (R1 or R2 resection) have a median OS of 7 months compared with 23 months in those who undergo resection with negative margins (R0 resection). For tumors that have invaded the sacrum, sacrectomy becomes necessary to achieve R0 resection. The objective of this study was to provide a descriptive multicenter account of resection for locally invasive colorectal carcinoma with sacral invasion, focusing on the association of tumor morphometry with surgical planning and perioperative outcomes. METHODS Demographic, comorbidity, clinical, tumor-specific, operative characteristic, and outcome data were collected on all patients who underwent resection of colorectal carcinoma with concurrent sacral resection between January 2005 and May 2022. Patients were grouped into those having undergone surgery for purely palliative intent, or those with resection with attempt at local control and dichotomized into level of osteotomy (either proximal or distal to the S2–3 level). RESULTS Twenty-two patients (median age 50.5 [IQR 43.3–60.0] years, 54.5% female) underwent sacrectomy for colorectal carcinoma. Operative records indicated intent for local control in 14 patients and palliative in the remaining 8 patients. Palliative surgical intent was based primarily on the presence of distant metastases. There was no significant difference in median local progression-free survival between patients undergoing osteotomy proximal to the S2–3 level and those undergoing osteotomy distal to the S2–3 level. CONCLUSIONS En bloc resection is believed to offer the best local control in patients with locally invasive colorectal carcinoma. The present descriptive series highlights outcomes of en bloc resection with partial or full sacrectomy in patients with tumors showing local extension into the sacrum. Complications are common, most often in the form of wound dehiscence or infection, and many patients require placement in a rehabilitation or intermediate-care facility upon discharge. However, for those with stage III (locally aggressive) disease, median OS exceeds 16 years, suggesting that such aggressive management with en bloc resection may be warranted in properly selected patients.

Study Design Retrospective Cohort. Objectives Craniovertebral instability can arise from various congenital or acquired conditions, but definitive management often requires craniocervical fusion. This study evaluates whether postoperative clivo-axial angle (CXA) can predict distal junctional failure in patients undergoing craniocervical fusion. While postoperative alignment of the head and cervical spine can be quantified via the CXA, it is unclear whether the CXA can predict distal junctional failure. Methods All patients undergoing craniocervical decompression and fusion (CCF) for craniovertebral instability between 2012 and 2023 at a single institution were identified. Patients experiencing adjacent segment disease (ASD) were identified and compared to those without said pathology based on CXA, Grabb-Oakes line (pBC2), and the presence of cervical kyphosis, cervical disc degeneration, or subluxation on pre- and postoperative imaging. Statistical analysis included Shapiro-Wilk tests for normality, followed by independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests with FDR adjusted P values as appropriate, and univariable logistic regression. Results 71 patients were included, of whom ten (14.3%) developed distal junctional kyphosis and 3 (4.3%) developed cervical spondylolisthesis. The median postoperative CXA was significantly lower in non-ASD patients (144° [IQR: 140-148°] vs 158° [IQR: 153-162°]; P < .001) and logistic regression showed that each 10° degree increase in CXA was associated with a 6.7-fold higher odds of ASD. Conclusions We found craniocervical alignment, as assessed by CXA, independently predicted distal junctional disease in patients undergoing craniocervical fusion, possibly due to low preoperative CXA in these patients. Large increases in CXA may contribute to postoperative instrumentation failure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Aggressive resection for primary tumors of the spine are associated with a high rate of adverse events (AEs), but the impact of AEs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains unknown and is critical to the shared decision-making. Our primary objective was to assess the impact of surgical AEs on PROs using an international registry. Assessing the impact on clinical outcomes and identifying risk factors for AEs were our secondary objectives. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for a primary spinal tumor were selected through the Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network. Our primary outcome was the impact of AEs on PROs at 3 and 12 months after surgery (measured with Spinal Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire, Short-Form 36, and EuroQol 5 Dimension). We also assessed the impact on clinical outcomes (local control, surgical margins, readmission, reoperation, and mortality). We stratified our results according to severity of AEs, histology, and type of resection. RESULTS: 374 patients met inclusion criteria (219 males/155 females). The mean age of the cohort was 48.7 years. The most frequent histology was chordoma (37.3%) followed by chondrosarcoma (8.8%). Sixty-seven patients (17.9%) experienced at least 1 intraoperative AE and 117 patients (31.3%) had at least 1 postoperative AE within 3 months. Overall, 159 patients (42.5%) experienced AEs. The readmission rate was significantly higher in patients who experienced AEs (Any AE: 10.1% vs no AE: 1.9% within 3 months; P = <0.001). PROs were not significantly affected by AEs in most questionnaires. Local control, risk of reoperation, mortality, and achieving preplanned margins were similar between AE groups. CONCLUSION: The rate of surgical AEs is considerable in this population. Surgical AEs seem to be associated with a higher number of readmissions, but do not seem to result in significant differences in PROs or in a higher risk of reoperation, mortality, and failure to achieve preplanned margins.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The palliative impact of spine surgery for metastatic disease is evolving with improvements in surgical technique and multidisciplinary cancer care. The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate long-term clinical outcomes including health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures, using spine cancer–specific patient-reported-outcome (PRO) measures, in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases who underwent surgical management. METHODS: The Epidemiology, Process, and Outcomes of Spine Oncology (EPOSO, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01825161) trial is a prospective-observational cohort study that included 10 specialist centers in North America and Europe. Patients aged 18 to 75 years who underwent surgery for spinal metastases were included. Prospective assessments included both spine tumor–specific and generic PRO tools which were collected for a minimum of 2 years post-treatment or until death. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty patients (51.8% female, mean age 57.9 years) were included. At presentation, the mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6.0, 35.7% had neurological deficits as defined by the American Spinal Cord Injury Association scores, 47.2% had high-grade epidural spinal cord compression (2-3), and 89.6% had impending or frank instability as measured by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score of ≥7. The most common primary tumor sites were breast (20.2%), lung (18.8%), kidney (16.2%), and prostate (6.5%). The median overall survival postsurgery was 501 days, and the 2-year progression-free-survival rate was 38.4%. Compared with baseline, significant and durable improvements in HRQOL were observed at the 6-week, 12-week, 26-week, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up assessments from a battery of PRO questionnaires including the spine cancer–specific, validated, Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire v2.0, the Short Form 36 version 2, EuroQol-5 Dimension (3L), and pain numerical rating scale score. CONCLUSION: Multi-institutional, prospective-outcomes data confirm that surgical decompression and/or stabilization provides meaningful and durable improvements in multiple HRQOL domains, including spine-specific outcomes based on the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire v2.0, for patients with metastatic spine disease.

Study Design. Retrospective review of prospective, multicenter and international cohort study. Objective. To describe the effect of gender on HRQoL, clinical outcomes and survival for patients with spinal metastases treated with either surgery and/or radiation. Summary of Background Data. Gender differences in health-related outcomes are demonstrated in numerous studies, with women experiencing worse outcomes and receiving lower standards of care than men, however, the influence that gender has on low health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and clinical outcomes after spine surgery remains unclear. Methods. Patient demographic data, overall survival, treatment details, perioperative complications, and HRQoL measures including EQ-5D, pain NRS, the short form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) and the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0) were reviewed. Patients were stratified by sex, and a separate sensitivity analysis that excluded gender-specific cancers (i.e., breast, prostate, etc.) was performed. Results. The study cohort included 207 female and 183 male patients, with age, smoking status, and site of primary cancer being significantly different between the two cohorts (P<0.001). Both males and females experienced significantly improved SOSGOQ2.0, EQ-5D, and pain NRS scores at all study time points from baseline (P<0.001). Upon sensitivity analysis, (gender-specific cancers removed from analysis), the significant improvement in SOSGOQ physical, mental, and social subdomains and on SF-36 domains disappeared for females. Males experienced higher rates of postoperative complications. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of both the overall and sensitivity analysis cohorts showed females lived longer than males after treatment (P=0.001 and 0.043, respectively). Conclusion. Both males and females experienced significantly improved HRQoL scores after treatment, but females demonstrated longer survival and a lower complication rate. This study suggests that gender may be a prognostic factor in survival and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing treatment for spine metastases and should be taken into consideration when counseling patients accordingly.