Efron, Jonathan E.

OBJECTIVE Management of locally invasive colorectal carcinoma at any stage currently involves surgical excision followed by chemoradiotherapy; however, the prognosis is poor, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of only 5%. Failure to achieve gross-total resection is associated with poorer OS, and patients with residual tumor postresection (R1 or R2 resection) have a median OS of 7 months compared with 23 months in those who undergo resection with negative margins (R0 resection). For tumors that have invaded the sacrum, sacrectomy becomes necessary to achieve R0 resection. The objective of this study was to provide a descriptive multicenter account of resection for locally invasive colorectal carcinoma with sacral invasion, focusing on the association of tumor morphometry with surgical planning and perioperative outcomes. METHODS Demographic, comorbidity, clinical, tumor-specific, operative characteristic, and outcome data were collected on all patients who underwent resection of colorectal carcinoma with concurrent sacral resection between January 2005 and May 2022. Patients were grouped into those having undergone surgery for purely palliative intent, or those with resection with attempt at local control and dichotomized into level of osteotomy (either proximal or distal to the S2–3 level). RESULTS Twenty-two patients (median age 50.5 [IQR 43.3–60.0] years, 54.5% female) underwent sacrectomy for colorectal carcinoma. Operative records indicated intent for local control in 14 patients and palliative in the remaining 8 patients. Palliative surgical intent was based primarily on the presence of distant metastases. There was no significant difference in median local progression-free survival between patients undergoing osteotomy proximal to the S2–3 level and those undergoing osteotomy distal to the S2–3 level. CONCLUSIONS En bloc resection is believed to offer the best local control in patients with locally invasive colorectal carcinoma. The present descriptive series highlights outcomes of en bloc resection with partial or full sacrectomy in patients with tumors showing local extension into the sacrum. Complications are common, most often in the form of wound dehiscence or infection, and many patients require placement in a rehabilitation or intermediate-care facility upon discharge. However, for those with stage III (locally aggressive) disease, median OS exceeds 16 years, suggesting that such aggressive management with en bloc resection may be warranted in properly selected patients.

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of the present study was to examine the early outcome in patients undergoing intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease (CD) while they are receiving perioperative immunosuppressive medication.MethodsWe reviewed patients with CD undergoing intestinal surgery from 1999 to 2007. Demographics and relevant perioperative information, including medication, were extracted from patient charts. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test.ResultsDuring the course of the study period 112 with Crohn’s disease underwent intestinal resection, and 69 of them were receiving perioperative medication (47, corticosteroids; 39, immunomodulators; and 17, anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α antibodies). There were no deaths. Median blood loss was 137 ml. Twenty‐two of the patients using perioperative medication (32%) experienced complications, 10 of which were major. The major complications occurred in 3 of the 43 patients (7%) who were not receiving perioperative medications, in 5 of 38 patients (13%) who were receiving one drug, 4 of 28 patients (14%) receiving two drugs, and 1 of 3 patients (33%) receiving three drugs. Thus the occurrence of major complications was not significantly greater in patients receiving perioperative medication. Risk factors for a major complication were intraoperative blood loss >400 ml (P < 0.003) and emergency surgery (P < 0.005).ConclusionsThe occurrence of complications in Crohn’s disease patients undergoing intestinal resection was not associated with the use of immunosuppressive medication. However, emergency surgery and blood loss were risk factors, and reflect the difficulty of surgery in this group of patients.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic and conventional parastomal hernia repairs. A retrospective review of parastomal hernia repairs was performed. Conventional repairs included primary suture repair, stoma relocation, and mesh repair. Laparoscopic repairs included the Sugarbaker and keyhole techniques. Forty-nine patients underwent repair of symptomatic parastomal hernias: 19 ileostomies, 13 colostomies, and 17 urostomies. Thirty patients underwent 39 conventional repairs. Nineteen patients underwent laparoscopic surgical repairs. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic repair (208 ± 58 vs 162 ± 114 minutes, P = .06). The mean length of stay was 6 days for both groups ( P = .74). The mean follow-up was shorter in the laparoscopic group (20 vs 65 months, P ≤ .001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of surgical site infections (11% laparoscopic vs 5% conventional, P = .60) or complication rates (63% laparoscopic vs 36% conventional, P = .67). Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is a feasible operation with similar short-term outcomes to conventional repairs.