ImportanceSurvivors of thyroid cancer represent 10% of all cancer survivors in the US, yet their unmet care needs remain unexplored. Understanding the unmet care needs of survivors of thyroid cancer could help develop targeted interventions to enhance their quality of life and overall well-being.ObjectiveTo summarize the unmet care needs of survivors of thyroid cancer and programs to address them and to summarize the reporting and patterns of sociodemographic factors influencing these needs across studies.Evidence ReviewA systematic review and meta-narrative synthesis on studies published from January 2000 to September 2023 that evaluated the unmet needs of survivors of thyroid cancer or clinical programs to address them. The review included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Two reviewers independently identified relevant articles and extracted data using standardized forms. Unmet care needs were summarized using the Supportive Care Framework for Cancer, whereas sociodemographic characteristics were evaluated according to the PROGRESS-Plus framework. A narrative synthesis was performed for quantitative studies, and a meta-narrative was created for qualitative studies. The risk of bias in the included studies was also assessed.FindingsWe included 14 quantitative studies (n = 8930) and 9 qualitative studies (n = 166) evaluating unmet care needs. Reported participant demographics were female (7653/9034 [85%]), White (2497/2986 [84%]), 40 years or older (2497/2986 [58%]), well-educated (1493/2124 [70%]), married or in stable relationships (1445/2114 [68%]), and English-speaking (1815/1915 [95%]). Quantitative studies primarily assessed and demonstrated unmet psychological and informational needs among survivors of thyroid cancer. Qualitative synthesis highlighted the negative impact of thyroid cancer’s perception as a “good cancer,” unmet informational and emotional support needs throughout survivorship stages, and practical hindrances in daily life. Sociodemographic data reporting was limited to a few factors influencing thyroid cancer care (eg, age, sex reported in >90% vs socioeconomic status <10%). One interventional study evaluating a patient navigation program was identified.Conclusions and RelevanceThis systematic review found that adult survivors of thyroid cancer report unmet informational, psychological, emotional, and practical support needs, which may be influenced by the good cancer label. Although patient demographics shape thyroid cancer care experiences and needs, population description is primarily limited to age and sex, overlooking other important variables that can affect care.
Purpose of review To analyze the evolving epidemiologic trends in thyroid disease, focusing on risk factors, underlying drivers of these changes, and their implications on clinical practice and research priorities. Recent findings Thyroid disease remains one of the most prevalent groups of disorders globally, and the shift in its frequency and distribution is multifactorial. The prevalence of hypothyroidism increases with age, although normal thyrotropin ranges appear to be age-dependent, raising concern for potentially inappropriate levothyroxine use. Hyperthyroidism and Graves’ disease continue to be predominant in reproductive-age women but exhibit a milder phenotype at diagnosis. Thyroid nodules are increasingly found in asymptomatic patients, likely from more widespread use of neck and chest imaging. Thyroid cancer incidence has risen exponentially over the years, mostly driven by overdiagnosis of low-risk tumors; however, a small rise in incidence of higher risk tumors has been noted. Obesity appears to be a risk factor for thyroid cancer occurrence and more aggressive forms of the disease. Summary Understanding epidemiologic trends in thyroid disease is crucial for guiding clinical practice and research efforts, aiming to optimize patient outcomes while preventing unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions.
Interventions to improve symptomatology in patients with hypothyroidism and persistent symptoms: A systematic review.
Abstract Background Levothyroxine (LT4) monotherapy is the standard treatment for hypothyroidism; however, 10–15% of patients have persistent hypothyroid symptoms despite normalizing thyroid hormone levels with LT4. This study aims to summarize the best available evidence on interventions to improve symptomatology in patients with hypothyroidism and persistent symptoms. Methods A systematic search was conducted in March 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on interventions for adult patients with persistent hypothyroid symptoms despite biochemical euthyroidism on thyroid hormone replacement. Results Of 277 articles, seven fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 455 participants were included. Most intervention participants were female (78.6%) with a mean age of 47.5 years. Five clinical trials evaluating ginger (vs. starch), L-carnitine (vs. placebo), combination LT4 and liothyronine (LT3) (vs. LT4 or placebo), and surgery for patients with serum antithyroid peroxidase (TPO Ab) titers greater than 1000 IU/ml (vs. LT4) found inconsistent improvement in hypothyroidism related symptoms and general health. Of these clinical trials, the use of ginger and surgery showed the largest improvements in fatigue scores. One observational study comparing thyroidectomy vs observation found no impact difference on general health. Lastly, another observational study evaluating combination LT4/LT3 (vs. LT4 monotherapy) found improvement in fatigue and QoL. There were 31 (12%) adverse events in the intervention group and 18 (10.8%) in the comparator group. Conclusions There is no high-quality evidence supporting any intervention for persistent symptoms in hypothyroidism. Available evidence, limited by the risk of bias, inconsistency, and heterogeneity, suggests that some persistent symptoms, particularly fatigue, could improve with ginger and thyroidectomy. Trial registry number:PROSPERO (CRD42022318720)
Purpose of review Thyroid ultrasound (TUS) is a common diagnostic test that can help guide the management of patients with thyroid conditions. Yet, inappropriate use of TUS can lead to harmful unintended consequences. This review aims to describe trends in the use and appropriateness of TUS in practice, drivers and consequences of inappropriate use, and potential solutions to decrease overuse. Recent findings TUS use has increased in the U.S. and is associated with increased diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Between 10–50% of TUSs may be ordered outside of clinical practice recommendations. Patients who receive an inappropriate TUS and are incidentally found to have a thyroid nodule may experience unnecessary worry, diagnostic interventions, and potential overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer. The drivers of inappropriate TUS use are not yet fully understood, but it is likely that a combination of clinician, patient, and healthcare system factors contribute to this problem. Summary Inappropriate TUS is a factor leading to the overdiagnosis of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer, resulting in increased healthcare costs and potential harm to patients. To effectively address the overuse of this diagnostic test, it is necessary to gain a deeper understanding of the frequency of inappropriate TUS use in clinical practice and the factors that contribute to it. With this knowledge, interventions can be developed to reduce the inappropriate use of TUS, leading to improved patient outcomes and more efficient use of healthcare resources.