Montane, Heather N.

e23270 Background: Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer which have seen drastic improvement in patient survival over the last decade. BRAF is the most common driver mutation in melanoma, seen in ≈50% of all patients (≈30% of patients > 65). The use of BRAF & MEK inhibitors yields high response rates, though it is limited by toxicity and development of acquired resistance. Acknowledging these limitations, we aimed at assessing the efficacy and toxicity of these agents in melanoma patients > 65. Methods: We identified electronic medical records of all melanoma patients > 65 that were treated with BRAF & MEK inhibitors at our institution over the years 2017-2023. Data was retrospectively collected including demographics, disease characteristics, treatment given, response patterns and toxicity. Results: 106 patients were identified. The median age was 71 (65-89), 55% were males. The median follow up was 28.9 months. 32 (30%) patients were treated at first line, 58 (55%) at second line and 16 (15%) at third line. 88 (83%) evaluable patients received treatment for unresectable/metastatic disease of which 84% had an objective response (60% partial response, 24% complete response). Response rate (RR) was 82%, 85% and 87% for first, second and third line respectively. RR was 86% for patients with an increased serum lactate dehydrogenase. 33% of patients had active central nervous system (CNS) metastases at treatment initiation, for whom the systemic RR was 80% and the CNS RR was 39%. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months, with a PFS of 6, 8.3 and 13.4 months for first, second and third line respectively. The median PFS was 5.7 months for patients with active CNS disease. The median overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation was 15.7 months (12.5, 14.5, 31.9 for first, second & third line respectively). The median OS for patients with CNS disease was 9.8 months. 16 patients were treated in the adjuvant setting, of which 6 (37%) finished treatment as planned, 3 stopped due to disease progression (19%) and 6 stopped due to toxicity (37%). 88% of patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade, with 27% having grade 3-4 toxicity. There were no grade 5 toxicities reported. 36% of patients experienced one AE, while 52% experienced two or more. 21% of patients stopped treatment due to toxicity, 28% needed a dose reduction and 20% changed to different BRAF/MEK inhibitors. 10% of patients needed systemic corticosteroids to treat AEs. The most common toxicities seen were fever (30%), fatigue (30%), skin rash (22%), elevated liver function tests (20%), arthralgia/myalgia (15%), nausea (14%) and diarrhea (11%). 7% had decrease in cardiac ejection fraction with one grade 3 leading to treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Treatment with BRAF & MEK inhibitors is challenging in older patients, with a high prevalence of toxicity leading to treatment modifications and discontinuation. Efficacy seems to be the same as in the general population.

ABSTRACT Introduction Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a treatment option for leptomeningeal disease (LMD), which permits whole neuroaxis treatment while minimizing toxicity. Despite this, patients inevitably experience progression. Adding systemic therapy to pCSI may improve outcomes. Methods In this single-institution retrospective case series, we present the feasibility of treatment with pCSI (30Gy, 10 fractions) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in two sequential patients with LMD from melanoma. Results The first patient developed LMD related to BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma after prior ICI and BRAF-targeted therapy. After pCSI with concurrent nivolumab, the addition of relatlimab, and BRAF-targeted therapy, he remained alive 7 months after LMD diagnosis despite central nervous system progression. The second patient developed LMD related to BRAF-wildtype melanoma after up-front ICI. He received pCSI with concurrent ipilimumab and nivolumab, then nivolumab maintenance. Though therapy was held for ICI hepatitis, the patient remained progression-free 5 months after LMD diagnosis. Conclusion Adding an ICI to pCSI is feasible for patients with LMD and demonstrates a tolerable toxicity profile. While prospective evaluation is ultimately warranted, pCSI with ICI may confer survival benefits, even after prior ICI.

9538 Background: Uveal melanoma has a poor prognosis following metastasis to the liver. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are often utilized in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM); however, ICIs in MUM have low response rates. We studied the association of immune infiltrates in MUM liver metastases with survival outcomes for all patients, in addition to evaluating if immune infiltrates improve survival for patients treated with ICIs. Methods: We included MUM patients with liver metastases who had pre-treatment liver biopsies available at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Demographics, disease characteristics, treatments, and clinical outcomes were obtained from the electronic medical record. Core biopsies of liver metastases were reviewed for the presence of lymphocytes at interface of the tumor and liver parenchyma, and for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). If TILs were present, then additional immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed for CD3, CD4, CD8, PD1, CD25, and FoxP3. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups with Cox proportional hazards regression. Median OS and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated and p-values (p) <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: 140 patients with MUM who had pre-treatment liver biopsies were identified. 122 biopsies were evaluable for the presence of lymphocytes, either at the tumor-liver interface, or for TILs. 80/122 (65.6%) biopsies showed presence of any lymphocyte and 27/80 had TILs. 27 biopsies had sufficient tissue for further IHC classification. CD8+ T cells were identified in 27/27 samples, T cell PD1 positivity ≥1% in 4/27 samples, and regulatory T cell markers (CD25 and/or FoxP3) in 18/27 samples. Median OS for the entire cohort was 16 months (mo). Patients still alive at the time of data analysis had at least one year of follow-up available (range 13-124 mo). Univariate analyses (UVA) showed no significant improvement in OS based on the presence of any lymphocytes (HR 1.01, p 0.98), lymphocytes at the tumor-liver interface (HR 1.10, p 0.64), TILs (HR 0.78, p 0.27), >50% CD8+ T cells (HR 0.88, p 0.77), or absence of FoxP3+ T cells (HR 0.68, p 0.40). In the 69 patients treated with ICIs (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or ipilimumab plus nivolumab), neither the presence of any lymphocytes (HR 1.19, p 0.56) nor TILs (HR 0.68, p 0.24) were associated with an OS benefit. Conclusions: We present a large cohort of patients with MUM where we characterized immune infiltrates in liver metastases and evaluated clinical outcomes. OS did not significantly improve with the presence of any lymphocytes, TILs, CD8+ T cells, or with the absence of FoxP3+ T cells. These results were consistent across all patients whether they were treated with ICIs or not. Our findings suggest that lymphocytes in MUM are functionally dormant and highlights the need for novel immune-activating treatment strategies.