Limberg, Jacqueline K.

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Activation of the carotid body chemoreceptors with hypoxia alters baroreceptor‐mediated responses in humans. We aimed to examine whether this relationship can be translated to other chemoreceptor stimuli (i.e. hypoglycaemia). What is the main finding and its importance? We show that hypoglycaemia‐mediated changes in heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity cannot be attributed exclusively to the carotid chemoreceptors; however, the chemoreceptors play a role in resetting the baroreflex working range during hypoglycaemia. These results provide a potential mechanism for impaired glycaemic control and increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with carotid chemoreceptor overactivity (i.e. sleep apnoea). Activation of the carotid body chemoreceptors with hypoxia alters baroreceptor‐mediated responses. We aimed to examine whether this relationship can be translated to other chemoreceptor stimuli (i.e. hypoglycaemia) by testing the following hypotheses: (i) activation of the carotid body chemoreceptors with hypoglycaemia would reduce spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (sCBRS) in healthy humans; and (ii) desensitization of the carotid chemoreceptors with hyperoxia would restore sCBRS to baseline levels during hypoglycaemia. Ten young healthy adults completed two 180 min hyperinsulinaemic [2 mU (kg fat‐free mass)−1 min−1], hypoglycaemic (∼3.2 μmol ml−1) clamps, separated by at least 1 week and randomized to normoxia (arterial partial pressure of O2, 122 ± 10 mmHg) or hyperoxia (arterial partial pressure of O2, 424 ± 123 mmHg; to blunt activation of the carotid body glomus cells). Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, plasma catecholamines, heart rate variability (HRV) and sCBRS were assessed. During hypoglycaemia, HRV and sCBRS were reduced (P < 0.05) and the baroreflex working range was shifted to higher heart rates. When hyperoxia was superimposed on hypoglycaemia, there was a greater reduction in blood pressure and a blunted rise in heart rate when compared with normoxic conditions (P < 0.05); however, there was no detectable effect of hyperoxia on sCBRS or HRV during hypoglycaemia (P > 0.05). In summary, hypoglycaemia‐mediated changes in HRV and sCBRS cannot be attributed exclusively to the carotid chemoreceptors; however, the chemoreceptors appear to play a role in resetting the baroreflex working range during hypoglycaemia.

The vasodilator signals regulating muscle blood flow during exercise are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that in young adults leg muscle vasodilation during steady-state exercise would be reduced independently by sequential pharmacological inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX) with NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) and ketorolac, respectively. We tested a second hypothesis that NOS and COX inhibition would increase leg oxygen consumption (V̇o2) based on the reported inhibition of mitochondrial respiration by nitric oxide. In 13 young adults, we measured heart rate (ECG), blood pressure (femoral venous and arterial catheters), blood gases, and venous oxygen saturation (indwelling femoral venous oximeter) during prolonged (25 min) steady-state dynamic knee extension exercise (60 kick/min, 19 W). Leg blood flow (LBF) was determined by Doppler ultrasound of the femoral artery. Whole body V̇o2 was measured, and leg V̇o2 was calculated from blood gases and LBF. Resting intra-arterial infusions of acetylcholine (ACh) and nitroprusside (NTP) tested inhibitor efficacy. Leg vascular conductance (LVC) to ACh was reduced up to 53 ± 4% by l-NAME + ketorolac infusion, and the LVC responses to NTP were unaltered. Exercise increased LVC from 4 ± 1 to 33.1 ± 2 ml·min−1·mmHg−1 and tended to decrease after l-NAME infusion (31 ± 2 ml·min−1·mmHg−1, P = 0.09). With subsequent administration of ketorolac LVC decreased to 29.6 ± 2 ml·min−1·mmHg−1 ( P = 0.02; n = 9). While exercise continued, LVC returned to control values (33 ± 2 ml·min−1·mmHg−1) within 3 min, suggesting involvement of additional vasodilator mechanisms. In four additional subjects, LVC tended to decrease with l-NAME infusion alone ( P = 0.08) but did not demonstrate the transient recovery. Whole body and leg V̇o2 increased with exercise but were not altered by l-NAME or l-NAME + ketorolac. These data indicate a modest role for NOS- and COX-mediated vasodilation in the leg of exercising humans during prolonged steady-state exercise, which can be restored acutely. Furthermore, NOS and COX do not appear to influence muscle V̇o2 in untrained healthy young adults.