Punj, Mantavya

Background: Sleep is vital for an athlete’s recovery, physical and mental health, and athletic performance. The impact on circadian rhythm from long-distance travel across multiple time zones has not been studied using wearable technology in female professional tennis players. Hypothesis: Travel between time zones in female professional tennis players leads to circadian desynchronization, causing disruption in sleep patterns, changes in physiologic parameters, and decreased athletic performance. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: A total of 52 female professional tennis players consented to wear, and share the data of, WHOOP 3.0 while traveling and competing on the Women’s Tennis Association (WTA) Tour. Linear mixed models examined the relationship between (1) travel and sleep/recovery and (2) sleep/recovery and match performance. Results: Sleep duration without travel averaged 437 minutes (436.8 ± 2.8). On the first night after travel, for every hour time zone difference (TZD) traveled regardless of direction, players slept 11 minutes less (−11.3 ± 0.96; P < 0.05). Eastward travel further reduced sleep (−24.5 ± 4.2; P < 0.05), while westward travel increased sleep duration (+30.0 ± 4.2; P < 0.05). These effects were reduced on the subsequent 2 nights. Conclusion: Sleep duration reduction was most prominent on the first night after travel, particularly with eastward travel, but improved on subsequent nights. The number of time zones crossed predictably increases the vulnerability for insufficient sleep duration, whereby a 2-hour TZD easterly, and 4-hour TZD westerly, reduces sleep duration <7 hours on the first night. No significant correlation was found between sleep disruption and competition performance in our female professional tennis population. Clinical Relevance: The findings suggest that professional tennis players should, and generally do, arrive at competition locations with enough time to resynchronize their circadian rhythm to the destination time zone; particularly if traveling eastward.

Abstract Introduction Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients who have failed positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for one reason or the other is now standard of care. Once the device is implanted and activated, voltage to stimulate the nerve has to be titrated over time, ultimately leading to an HNS titration study. There are 4 possible electrode configurations to stimulate different fibers in the nerve that can be employed for treatment. We present a case of a patient who was a challenge with worsening of OSA with Inspire. Report of case(s) A 65-year-old woman with hypertension, and severe OSA, intolerant of positive airway pressure or oral appliances was implanted with Inspire. Post activation, there was symptomatic improvement with reduction of overall apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from 34 per hour of sleep to 6.3 per hour. However, patient slept exclusively on the sides with evidence of significant residual disease in REM sleep. During subsequent weeks, patent reported inability to restrict position and discomfort and anxiety associated with up titration. Both awake endoscopy and advanced overnight HNS titration were pursued. All 4 electrode configurations were tested during both procedures. With the exception of (minus-plus-minus) configuration, there was worsening of sleep disordered breathing and higher residual AHI of 60 per hour on polysomnography and evidence of poor tongue motion and collapsed velopharynx on awake endoscopy. Inspire settings were readjusted to (minus-plus-minus) configuration with instructions for very slow outpatient uptitration and co-management of anxiety and discomfort with anxiolytics and sleep aids. Conclusion We make two important conclusions from this case. Firstly, although there are established criteria for patient selection for hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy, certain other factors that impact success which are not as easily defined include the patients’ expectations, tolerance of discomfort, propensity to anxiety and personality type which impact the ability to successfully titrate voltage with the Inspire device over time. Secondly, as the tongue is a complex muscle, both under titration and over titration may be counterproductive and additionally, electrode configuration may also have varying effects on tongue protrusion and impact success. Support (if any)