Nagorney, David M.

Abstract Celiac disease is associated with an increased risk of small bowel adenocarcinoma. The aims of this study were to investigate the molecular basis, assess outcomes, and identify clinicopathologic characteristics of small bowel adenocarcinoma in celiac disease. Retrospective case control cohort study of all celiac disease patients treated at our institution for small bowel adenocarcinoma and matched control patients with sporadic small bowel adenocarcinoma from July 1960 to November 2002. Mismatch repair (MMR) status was accessed by testing tissue for microsatellite instability (MSI) and for hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expression. Over a 40-year time period, 18 patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma and celiac disease were treated at the Mayo Clinic. One celiac disease patient was excluded. High-frequency MSI (MSI-H) was identified in 8 of 11 (73%) and 2 of 22 (9%) available small bowel adenocarcinoma specimens in the celiac disease and control groups, respectively. In the celiac disease group, MSI-H was associated with loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in 6 and 1 specimens, respectively. Loss of hMLH1 occurred in both control tumors. Stage was associated with celiac disease status (P = 0.018), and 78% of controls were stage III or IV compared with 47% of celiac disease patients. Overall, survival was better (P = 0.025) in the celiac disease group compared with stage-matched controls. Celiac disease patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma had a high incidence defective MMR (73%) compared with controls and had better survival compared with stage-matched controls. In addition, celiac disease patients presented more frequently with early-stage small bowel adenocarcinoma. The better survival and earlier presentation of small bowel adenocarcinoma in celiac disease appears to be biologically associated with defective MMR.

AbstractFocal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HA) are uncommon benign hepatic tumors that continue to pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. An update of a recent Mayo Clinic experience is presented to highlight the management of patients harboring these neoplasms. A marked female predominance was seen. Incidental diagnosis was more prevalent with FNH, whereas symptomatic presentation was typical of HA. The frequency of oral contraceptive steroid use was similar regardless of tumor histology. Preoperative diagnosis remains difficult. Scintigraphy proved most specific, and ultrasonography and computed tomography were equally sensitive. Resection was employed in most patients. There was no mortality and minimal morbidity. Selective observation of FNH was uneventful, but resolution of HA after abstinence of oral contraceptive steroids was uncommon. These findings and data from the literature support selective management of benign liver tumors.

AbstractThe etiology, prognosis, and optimal management of primary gastric carcinoids remain controversial. Records of 36 consecutive patients with gastric carcinoid (15 men) were reviewed retrospectively between 1975 and 1990. Follow‐up was complete in 97% of cases. Mean age at diagnosis was 58.4 years (range 24–82 years). The clinical presentations included anemia (72%), pain (69%), and carcinoid syndrome (11%). Associated autoimmune and endocrine abnormalities were common and included atrophic gastritis (67%), pernicious anemia (58%), hypothyroidism (39%), diabetes (19%), Addison's disease (6%), and hyperparathyroidism (6%). Lesions were nonantral in 78%, involving only the corpus in 42%, the fundus in 28%, and only the antrum in 8%; 42% were multiple. Urinary 5‐hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HIAA) and serum gastrin levels were elevated in 17% and 50% of those tested, respectively. Histologic examination revealed that 28% of lesions were ≥2 cm, and 33% had liver metastases on presentation or developed them during follow‐up. Eight patients (22%) died of tumor with a median survival of 39 months. The presence of metastases, atypical histology, serosal involvement, and size > 2 cm were adverse prognostic factors. In patients without hypergastrinemia (n=6), 66% developed metastases, 60% had elevated 5‐HIAA, and 50% died of carcinoid tumor. In sharp contrast, those patients with hypergastrinemia and “typical” gastric carcinoids (n=15), metastases and death did not occur (p<0.003 and p < 0.005, respectively, compared with eugastrinemic patients). In the latter group (hypergastrinemia and typical histology), pernicious anemia was common (73%); solitary lesions and serosal penetration were seen comparatively less often (33% versus 100%, p<0.005 and 0% versus 33%, p<0.05, respectively); and no lesion measured > 2.0 cm compared to 66% in the group without elevated gastrin (p<0.002). No patient with hypergastrinaemia had elevated levels of 5‐HIAA. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 58% and 28%, respectively. Survival was 80% at 5 and 10 years in the hypergastrinemic group. Gastric carcinoid tumors that are histologically atypical, large (>2 cm), or present without elevated gastrin are potentially lethal and require aggressive therapy. In contrast, gastric carcinoids with typical histology and hypergastrinemia are rarely lethal, and conservative management with local excision and close observation is appropriate.

AbstractAlthough useful palliation can often be achieved when external beam irradiation and chemotherapy are used to treat locally advanced gastrointestinal malignancies, local control and long‐term survival are infrequent in view of the limited tolerance of surrounding organs and tissues. In view of dose limitations of external beam irradiation, intraoperative irradiation (IORT) with electrons has been used as a supplement to external treatment in an attempt to improve the therapeutic ratio of local control versus complications. An IORT dose of 10 to 20 Gy has been combined with fractionated external beam doses of 45 to 55 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions in studies performed in the United States, Japan, Europe, and Scandinavian countries. In this paper the indications for and the results of aggressive combined techniques that include IORT are discussed. Results obtained with external beam techniques alone or with chemotherapy and resection are presented by site to demonstrate the need for higher doses of irradiation. When results from IORT series are compared to standard treatment with regard to disease control and survival, local control appears better with locally advanced colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer; and survival appears better with colorectal ± biliary cancers. With pancreatic cancer, improvements in local control do not translate into increased survival in view of the high incidence of subsequent liver and peritoneal failures. Implications for future strategies in all sites are discussed.

AbstractOur aim was to examine the long‐term success of cholecystoenterostomy performed for the relief of benign extrahepatic biliary obstruction. Concern about the ability of cholecystoenterostomy to provide reliable long‐term biliary decompression has led many to abandon its use for benign biliary obstruction. Thirty‐four patients who underwent cholecystoenterostomy for benign biliary obstruction over a 17‐year period were reviewed. Patients were followed until cholecystoenterostomy failure, death, or to date. Failure was defined as recurrent biliary obstruction or cholangitis requiring therapeutic intervention. Mean follow‐up was 8.0 years. Early postoperative morbidity occurred in 11 patients (32%), but only one early complication (cholangitis) was related directly to the cholecystoenteric anastomosis. Five patients (15%) experienced late biliary tract complications related directly to the cholecystoenterostomy including recurrent biliary stones with biliary obstruction in four and anastomotic stricture in one. All required reoperation and conversion to choledochoenterostomy at a mean of 112 months. Cholecystoenterostomy can provide reasonably effective long‐term biliary decompression in selected patients with benign biliary obstruction.

Abstract The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses can be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk) or by post. All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published in the Journal. Letters must be no more than 250 words in length. Letters submitted by post should be typed on A4-sized paper in double spacing and should be accompanied by a disk.

Abstract Background Primary sarcomas of the liver are extremely rare in adults. Optimal therapeutic approaches remain unclear. Methods Twenty consecutive adult patients who had surgical treatment for primary hepatic sarcomas were reviewed. Patient age ranged from 23 to 80 years. Other than one patient with primary hepatic angiosarcoma who had a history of thorium dioxide colloid (Thorotrast) exposure 23 years before diagnosis, no predisposing causes were apparent. Nineteen patients had hepatic resection and one patient had an orthotopic liver transplant. No patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy but radiotherapy was delivered intraoperatively in one patient. Results Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histological type of sarcoma diagnosed (five of 20 patients), followed by malignant solitary fibrous tumour (four) and epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (three). Fourteen tumours were high-grade sarcomas and six were low grade malignancies. Thirteen patients developed a recurrence. Distant metastases (ten patients) and intrahepatic recurrence (six) were the predominant sites of initial treatment failure. Six patients received salvage chemotherapy. Histological grade was the only factor significantly associated with overall patient survival (P = 0·03). With complete resection, patients with high-grade tumours had a 5-year survival rate of 18 (95 per cent confidence interval 5–62) per cent compared with 80 (52–100) per cent for patients with low-grade tumours. The 5-year survival rate for all 20 patients was 37 (20–60) per cent. Conclusion Surgical resection is the only effective therapy for primary hepatic sarcomas at present. Better adjuvant therapy is necessary, especially for high-grade malignancies, owing to the high failure rate with operation alone.