Schrup, S

Abstract Introduction Many couples who do not achieve pregnancy with intrauterine insemination (IUI) subsequently pursue in vitro fertilization (IVF). While the impact of semen parameters on IUI outcomes is well established, it remains unclear whether characteristics of sperm following IUI preparation predict future IVF success. Many couples who do not achieve pregnancy with intrauterine insemination (IUI) subsequently pursue in vitro fertilization (IVF). While the impact of semen parameters on IUI outcomes is well established, it remains unclear whether sperm characteristics following IUI preparation predict future IVF success. Here we study a novel, clinically accessible marker of sperm quality – percent change in total motile sperm (TMS) after IUI sperm wash-that may predict fertilization and blastulation outcomes in subsequent IVF cycles. Objective This aims to evaluate the association between changes in total motile sperm (TMS) after IUI sperm wash and fertilization rates in subsequent IVF cycles.This study aims to evaluate the association between changes in TMS after IUI sperm wash and fertilization and blastulation rates in subsequent IVF cycles. Methods In this retrospective study, we identified couples at a single academic center who failed to achieve a live birth following IUI and subsequently underwent IVF with the same partner. To minimize confounding, only couples with a diagnosis of unexplained infertility or male factor infertility were included. In patients who underwent multiple IUIs (median of 2), the cycle with the greatest percent decrease in TMS was selected for analysis. Additional predictive variables of female partner age, male partner age, pre-wash TMS, and insemination method were assessed. A stepwise variable selection method was utilized to identify predictors of fertilization rate and complete blastulation failure, with linear and logistic regression models of selected variables developed, respectively. Results From the cohort of 388 couples, the median fertilization rate during IVF was 56% (IQR 43%–70%). Thirteen percent of couples experienced complete blastulation failure. Change in TMS was selected as a predictor of both fertilization rate and blastulation failure. A 10% greater decline in TMS after IUI sperm wash was associated with a 1.02% lower fertilization rate (p=0.052), after adjustment for insemination method. A 10% greater decrease in TMS was associated with a 1.22-times (95% CI 1.04, 1.48) increased odds of blastulation failure (p=0.023) after adjusting for female partner age. Conclusions A greater percent decrease in TMS following IUI sperm wash is associated with lower fertilization rates and a higher odds of blastulation failure in subsequent IVF cycles. These findings support the hypothesis that significant declines in TMS after sperm preparation may reflect underlying sperm quality defects not detected by routine semen analysis, yet still relevant to fertility outcomes. By identifying sperm quality issues not apparent on standard semen analysis, these findings offer a new tool for risk stratification and counseling of couples transitioning from IUI to IVF. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction The AUA Census offers broad insight into urology, however, there is limited information reported regarding sub-specialists. We designed a survey to capture similar data among urologists who treat male sexual health, including demographics, clinical practice characteristics, and job satisfaction. Objective To characterize the demographics, practice characteristics and job satisfaction of providers who treat male sexual health. Methods A survey was developed and distributed to all relevant professional urological societies for male sexual health providers, including GURS, ISSM, SMSNA and SUPS. Averages, modes, counts, and ranges were examined. The survey remains open and additional responses are expected. Preliminary analysis as of June 15, 2022, yielded 76 responses; 58 were complete. Results The survey remains open and additional responses are expected. Preliminary analysis as of June 15, 2022, yielded 76 responses; 58 were complete. Demographics: The average age of respondents is 42 years old. 52 (89.6%) respondents self-identify as male, 6 (10.4%) as female. 67% of respondents identify as white (n=39), 7% identify as Asian (n=4), 7% identify as Black or African American (n=4), 2% identify as American Indian/Native American or Alaskan Native (n=1) and 17% preferred not to select a race or selected “other” (n=10); respondents were able to select more than one racial identity. 16% of respondents identified themselves as having Hispanic ethnicity (n=9). 84% of respondents are married (n=49) with 21% divorced or currently going through a divorce (n=12). On average, respondents have 1.5 children (range: 0-3, mode: 2). Work-life: The majority (58%) of respondents work in academic practice (n=34). 19% work in private practice (n=11). Employed physician, multispecialty, solo and hybrid private-VA practices make up the remaining 22% (n=4, 5, 3, 1 respectively). 72% of respondents practice in cities with a population greater than 500,000 (n=42), 12% work in cities with populations between 100,000 – 500,000 (n=7), 14% serve towns of less than 100,00 (n=8). Satisfaction: The survey asked providers binary yes/no questions about career satisfaction. 88% affirmed “I would pursue this career again” (yes, n=51; no, n=7). 69% affirmed “I am satisfied with my current level of compensation” (yes, n=40; no, n=18). 52% affirmed “I am satisfied with my current work-life balance” (yes, n=30; no, n=28). Female responders were significantly more likely to indicate that they are dissatisfied with work-life balance (p=0.0074).100% of female respondents reported dissatisfaction compared to 42% of males. Conclusions To our knowledge, this survey is the first survey exclusively of male sexual health providers. Among survey respondents, the average practitioner is white, male, and married with two children under 18. They are in the first half of their career at an academic institution in an urban area. Although nearly 90% would choose their career again, 50% are dissatisfied with work-life balance. Gender has a significant impact on satisfaction. While averages reflect low diversity within the field, they suggest that gender parity is on track with national trends while racial and ethnic diversity may exceed that of general urology (ref 1). Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Epididymectomy is indicated for patients with focal epididymal pain and bothersome epididymal cysts or masses. Similarly, spermatocelectomy is indicated for spermatoceles that have becomes symptomatic due to size or pain. The majority of scrotal surgeries are performed in the operating room (OR) using general or monitored anesthesia. Here, we sought to evaluate our experience with office-based epididymectomy and spermatocelectomy using only local anesthesia. Objective To evaluate post-procedural complications and pain resolution following epididymectomy or spermatocelectomy, comparing procedures performed in the clinic with only local anesthesia, compared to the OR. Methods We identified patients who underwent epididymectomy or spermatocelectomy at our institution from 2018-2021. A chart review was performed to identify pertinent information including whether the procedure was performed in the OR under monitored/general anesthesia versus in the clinic using only local anesthesia. Post-procedural outcomes including pain resolution (if applicable) and 30-day complications were compared between those who underwent epididymectomy or spermatocelectomy in the OR versus the office. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-squared test. Results A total of 112 patients were identified, including 23 (20.5%) who underwent epididymectomy and 89 (79.5%) who underwent spermatocelectomy. Mean patient follow-up was 14.8 months (SD 11.6). Indications for epididymectomy or spermatocelectomy included pain (n= 50, 44.6%), epididymal cyst/mass (n=6, 5.4%), and mass effect secondary to spermatocele (n=56, 50.0%). Fifty-seven procedures (50.9%) were performed in the office under local anesthesia. Nitrous oxide was used in 21 (36.8%) of these cases. Thirty-four patients (30.3%) were on anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy prior to surgery including 22 (64.7%) who continued anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy due to high-risk comorbidities. The adverse event rate within 30 days was similar between patients who underwent surgery in clinic versus OR (p=0.67). Specifically, adverse events occurred in 9 patients (8.0%), of whom 4 had their procedure performed in the clinic (7.0% of clinic procedures) and 5 had their procedure performed in the OR (9.1% of OR procedures). Specific adverse events included postoperative hematoma in 6 patients (66%) and a single case of each of the following: infection, inability to void postoperatively, and intestinal obstruction. Hematoma rates did not differ significantly between those who were or were not on anticoagulation perioperatively (p=0.057). In patients with reported adverse events, 3 (33.3%) required reoperation. Of the 50 patients who underwent epididymectomy or spermatocelectomy for scrotal content pain, 39 had sufficient documentation available to evaluate pain resolution. 82% (n=32) reported 50% improvement in pain. There was no statistically significant difference in the likelihood of reporting significant pain reduction based on the location of the procedure (OR versus clinic). Conclusions Epididymectomy and spermatocelectomy can be successfully carried out in the office using only local anesthesia, including in those patients who are high risk for general anesthesia or require maintenance of anticoagulation perioperatively. Pain improvement may be anticipated in the majority of appropriately selected patients following treatment in either the clinic or OR. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Medical policy bulletins (also known as clinical policy bulletins) are insurance company guidelines for administering plan benefits. These documents purport to summarize current research, evidence-based guidelines, regulatory status, and physician opinion to determine whether insurers consider procedures and services to be medically necessary. These bulletins, along with member benefit plans, determine which services are covered. We have previously explored the lack of uniformity that exists for insurance payer coverage for penile prostheses. Here, we sought to expand this investigation to determine insurance coverage criteria for medical and surgical management of common men’s health conditions. Objective To determine covered benefits for sexual medicine conditions among the top United States healthcare insurers. Methods A list of common sexual medicine conditions was generated, including Peyronie’s disease, hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, incontinence, and buried penis. The most common treatment modalities for each condition were identified (see Table I). Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings were used to identify the top ten largest private insurers in the United States by member enrollment. This list was cross-referenced with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) 2020 Market Share Report (ref 1). The following list of the largest private US health insurers was thus developed: United, Anthem, Centene, Kaiser, Humana, CVS, Healthcare Service Corporation (HCSC), Cigna, Molina, and Independence Health Group (IBX). Kaiser and Centene were excluded due to lack of nationwide medical policy bulletins. We reviewed medical policy bulletins from the remaining 8 insurers to determine whether the specific treatments were identified as medically necessary, experimental/investigational, or cosmetic. Services and procedures deemed medically necessary were coded as “covered,” and those listed as investigational, or cosmetic were coded as “not covered.” If information about a specific condition or treatment modality was not found in a company’s policy bulletin, it was coded as “unknown.” Results In total, we recorded 143 data points, across the 8 insurance providers. Our review of medical policy bulletins yielded 60 (41.9%) instances where services were considered medically necessary and/or “covered”, 18 (12.6%) non-covered or investigational/cosmetic services, and 65 (45.5%) services with unknown coverage (Table I; covered=1, non-covered=0, unknown=2). Conclusions We encountered substantial difficulty in navigating and interpreting insurance coverage for various sexual medicine treatments and conditions based on review of policy bulletins from the topic insurance providers in the US. There was no readily identifiable coverage information for >45% of the data points that we collected, and instances of “unknown” coverage exceeded covered services across the collective of the largest private insurers. While 76.9% of conditions for which there was available data were covered, we are unable to draw generalizable conclusions for most conditions as there are significant deficits in the availability of policy information from online insurance sources. Further challenges in determining coverage include the additional layers of limitations in member plan benefits (i.e. plan exclusions), which could compound confusion for both physicians and patients. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast.