Collins, Calvin

Abstract Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) stems from a variety of etiologies and often requires a multidisciplinary approach to optimize patient care. Objective We sought to assess attitudes and confidence regarding the treatment of erectile dysfunction across different provider types. Methods Responses were obtained through an anonymous, email-based survey of our institution's providers in the disciplines of urology, internal medicine, and family medicine. We created a novel tool of 25 5-point Likert scale questions regarding ED treatment. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test and sorted by respondent specialty. Ethical Committee approval was obtained before study. Results 138 health care providers returned surveys, including 58 internists (IM), 47 family physicians (FP), and 33 urologists (GU). FP and IM responses showed significant overlap with a few key statistically significant differences. In general, IM was much more positive in VED, penile implant as an option, penile implant satisfaction, and penile implant risk. 37% of IM agreed or strongly agreed inflatable penile prosthesis risk is low vs 6% FP (p = .0032). IM also more strongly supported team-based care and referral to specialists IM 71% vs. 51% FP (p = .0012). (Figures) When comparing GU versus FP + IM 24/25 questions revealed statistically significant differences revealing greater GU confidence and knowledge about ED with only the importance of a team-based approach not differing. Noteworthy points include 46% vs. 18% confidence for a detailed sexual history for GU vs. FP + IM (all other points % and same provider sequence). IIEF usage and familiarity were 61 vs. 3 and 88 vs. 18, respectively. 100 and 85 strongly/agreed that good options remained after pills failed. Regarding inflatable penile prosthesis, agreement or strong agreement for patient willingness to undergo surgery for ED 67 vs. 13; patient satisfaction 91 vs. 25, partner satisfaction 80 vs. 25; and would repeat surgery or recommend to a friend was 82 vs. 17. Finally, and perhaps most notably 83 vs. 11 of providers were aware that Medicare covered implants. (Figures). Conclusions Conclusions This survey reveals significant knowledge gaps for treatment options and outcomes for ED. Targeted provider education, particularly about penile prostheses, could optimize patient care. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Sexual therapy for male sexual dysfunction has been used to help patients address a variety of sexual dysfunction-related conditions. While this intervention is frequently recommended for patients by male sexual health experts, the rate of adherence to the recommended therapy and associated factors is unknown. Objective To understand factors leading to completion of sex therapy consultations and barriers that prevent it. Methods A survey was developed by experts in the management of male sexual dysfunction and sex therapy at our institution. The survey included questions focusing on the decision to pursue sex therapy (or not), barriers or facilitating factors, patient perceptions regarding the referral, and treatment success. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify those patients who were referred for sexual therapy after undergoing evaluation for male sexual dysfunction at an academic Men’s Health urology clinic from 2017 - present. The survey was mailed out to these patients, and respondent survey data was compiled to evaluate survey responses. Results To date, 23 patients completed the survey (20% response rate). Sixty-five percent of survey respondents were ≥ 50 years of age, 87% were straight, and 71% were married. Reasons for sex therapy referral were frequently multi-factorial and included erectile dysfunction (65%, n=15), low libido (43%, n=10), ejaculatory dysfunction (39%, n=9), performance anxiety (30%, n=7), relationship problems (30%, n-7), and genital pain (14%, n=3). Seventy-eight percent of patients (n=18) felt that sex therapy consultation was a reasonable part of their treatment plans. Six (26%) patients did not attend their recommended sex therapy consultations. Reported barriers included sense of shame (n=2), embarrassment (n=2), scheduling conflicts (n=1), lack of anticipated benefits (n=1), and feeling dismissed by the referring provider (n=2). Those who attended sex therapy frequently reported the perception that referral made sense based on their symptoms (n=10, 59%) and/or a feeling of desperation to “do anything do get better” (n=11, 65%). Seventy-eight percent of patients who attended sex therapy found it helpful and would recommend it to a friend with a similar concern. Conclusions The majority of male patients who are referred to sexual therapy feel it is beneficial. However, one in four men choose not to pursue this line of treatment despite recommendations from their treating physicians. Future work is needed to address barriers to pursuing sex therapy. Disclosure No