Curlee, Kathleen J.

Reoperative surgery for hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is fraught with hazard. When preoperative imaging studies are inconclusive or patient comorbidities are extensive fine needle-aspiration (FNA) is helpful to confirm the presence of suspected parathyroid tissue in the neck. Some surgeons refrain from using FNA because of the concern of tissue implantation (parathyromatosis). A retrospective review (1984–1996) of all patients diagnosed with HPT undergoing FNA of suspected parathyroid tissue was performed to document whether a correlation exists between FNA of suspected parathyroid tissue and subsequent development of parathyromatosis. Parathyromatosis was considered to have occurred when proven by histology or suspected on the basis of clinical studies. Of 81 patients with HPT undergoing ultrasound-guided FNA to assess abnormalities in the neck 41 patients with confirmed parathyroid tissue were identified. The indications for FNA in these 41 patients were: prior failed cervical exploration (n = 33), prior neck surgery and/or radiation (n = 2), inconclusive noninvasive imaging studies (n = 15), and severe comorbidities (n = 8). Mean follow-up was 5.8 years. No case of FNA-induced parathyromatosis was identified. FNA is useful to confirm the presence of parathyroid tissue in very select patients with hyperparathyroidism. FNA often eliminates the need for other imaging studies, may prevent a needless or likely fruitless re-exploration, and does not cause parathyromatosis.

AbstractSelected patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) who have a positive preoperative sestamibi scan can be managed safely and successfully with a focused cervical exploration without either adjuvant intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring or use of a gamma probe. This article reports a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients surgically treated at a tertiary referral center. From August 1998 to August 2002, 100 patients (68 women, 32 men; mean age 63 years [range: 29–89 years]) underwent a focused cervical approach without intraoperative PTH monitoring or use of the gamma probe after perioperative sestamibi injection. The study group comprised 9% of all patients (n = 1063) undergoing cervical exploration for pHPT during the study period. Ninety patients underwent an initial exploration, and 10 others underwent repeat cervical exploration following prior parathyroid (n = 7) or thyroid (n = 3) operation. Sestamibi scanning correlated with one enlarged parathyroid gland in all patients. Other enlarged glands were, however, not demonstrated in three patients (true positive = 97%; false negative = 3%). The single enlarged glands excised in all patients had a mean weight of 795 mg (range: 90–3640) and were histologically compatible with an adenoma. Postoperatively, 97% of patients were eucalcemic. Three patients remained hypercalcemic (3%). Of the three patients with persistent hypercalcemia, one underwent successful re‐exploration with excision of a 500 mg second adenoma, whereas the other two patients (with confirmed familial HPT) remained hypercalcemic. Mean hospitalization was 0.5 days (range: 0–3 days). There was no operative mortality. No patients had permanent hypocalcemia. Postoperative morbidity occurred in three patients: two self‐limiting cervical hematomas and one permanent vocal cord paralysis. Selected patients with pHPT due to single‐gland disease and an unequivocally positive preoperative sestamibi scan can safely and successfully be managed with a focused unilateral cervical exploration without either intraoperative PTH monitoring or use of the gamma probe. Further experience with this surgical approach seems warranted to determine the overall cure rate, operative morbidity, and the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative localization studies.

The trend toward limited exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism (1° HPT) has stemmed from advances in sestamibi scanning, gamma probe technology, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring (iPTH). Prior to widespread application, directed parathyroidectomy must be shown to meet the high standards of conventional cervical exploration. In this prospective, nonrandomized trial, results of parathyroidectomy utilizing the gamma probe, iPTH, or neither technique were evaluated. Altogether, 150 patients underwent parathyroidectomy utilizing the gamma probe (n = 50), iPTH (n = 50), or neither technique (n = 50). Each group was evaluated for operating time, length of hospitalization, cure rate, morbidity, mortality, and cost. A telephone survey was conducted with 25 patients in each group (n = 75) to address patient satisfaction. The gamma probe localized the abnormal gland in 66% of patients and confirmed cure intraoperatively in 84%. In the iPTH group, a more than 50% decrease from baseline occurred in 98%. The mean operating times were 76, 84, and 90 minutes, respectively (p = 0.16); and the mean length of hospitalization was 1 day. The biochemical cure rates were 98%, 100%, and 96%, respectively (p = 0.17). Total costs were $4476, $3918, and $3905, respectively. A total of 96% of patients in all three groups were "very satisfied" with their surgical procedure. Directed parathyroidectomy utilizing the gamma probe or iPTH assay does not significantly alter the operating time, length of hospitalization, cure rate, morbidity, mortality, or patient satisfaction when compared to conventional exploration in our practice. The probe is more expensive and was not a consistently reliable tool for localizing parathyroid pathology. PTH monitoring reliably predicts cure intraoperatively.