Moir, C.

Abstract Background Left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) is an effective anti-fibrillatory, minimally invasive therapy for patients with either LQTS or CPVT. As a pre-ganglionic fiber resection, re-growth or re-innervation is not possible. However, if a suboptimal CSD was performed, chances for post-LCSD breakthrough cardiac events (BCEs) are increased. Purpose To examine the prevalence and outcomes of patients requiring a re-do LCSD. Methods We performed a retrospective review of the 251 LQTS and CPVT patients who underwent CSD (mostly LCSD) at our institution to identify the subset referred for additional CSD because of recurrent BCEs after their primary LCSD that was performed elsewhere. Clinical data on symptomatic status prior to diagnosis and BCEs after first surgery as well as the surgical reports were reviewed to determine the reasons for the repeat procedure. Results Among the 15 patients (6% overall, 6 female; 13 LQTS, 2 CPVT) referred for additional CSD, 3 patients (20%) had a re-do LCSD performed instead of a sequential RCSD because of incomplete resection with the primary LCSD. Patient 1 is a male with Jervell-and-Lange Nielsen Syndrome (JLNS; KCNQ1-K421fs9X; KCNQ1-N365H), who first experienced syncope with torsades at age 3 after which a primary bilateral CSD was performed elsewhere. He had 2 BCEs and at age 12 underwent re-do LCSD, where his left-sided T2-T4 sympathetic chain with remnants of T1 were found to be intact. Patient 2 is a male who had 3 cardiac events prior to diagnosis (genotype negative LQTS) and LCSD at age 3. Following 3 BCEs, he underwent re-do LCSD at age 5 where scarring of T3 and intact stellate ganglion were found. Patient 3 is an adult female with CPVT (RYR2-deletion exon 3) who had multiple syncopal events, out-of-hospital arrest (leading to ICD) and 2 ICD-storms before primary bilateral CSD. Re-do LCSD was performed after identifying an intact left stellate ganglion and T2. Conclusions Before performing a primary bilateral CSD, proceeding to a RCSD after post-LCSD BCEs, or doing a videoscopic LCSD in the first place, it must be recognized that LCSD's success hinges on fully resecting the lower half of the stellate ganglion and the sympathetic chain through T4. Anything less is a partial denervation and likely ineffective procedure. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Purpose. Review the safety and long-term success with portosystemic shunts in children at a single institution. Methods. An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review of all children ages 19 and undergoing surgical portosystemic shunt from January 1990–September 2008. Results. Ten patients were identified, 8 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 15 years (range 5–19 years). Primary diagnoses were congenital hepatic fibrosis (5), hepatic vein thrombosis (2), portal vein thrombosis (2), and cystic fibrosis (1). Primary indications were repeated variceal bleeding (6), symptomatic hypersplenism (2), and significant liver dysfunction (2). Procedures performed were distal splenorenal bypass (4), side-to-side portocaval shunt (3), proximal splenorenal shunt (2), and an interposition H-graft portocaval shunt (1). There was no perioperative mortality and only minor morbidity. Seventy percent of patients had improvement of their symptoms. Eighty percent of shunts remained patent. Two were occluded at a median follow-up of 50 months (range 0.5–13.16 years). Two patients underwent subsequent liver transplantation. Two patients died at 0.5 and 12.8 years postoperatively, one from multisystem failure with cystic fibrosis and one from post-operative transplant complications. Conclusions. The need for portosystemic shunts in children is rare. However, in the era of liver transplantation, portosystemic shunts in selected patients with well-preserved liver function remains important. We conclude that portosystemic shunts are safe and efficacious in the control of variceal hemorrhage and symptoms related to hypersplenism.