Motiei, Arashk

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Systemic thrombolysis is recommended for high-risk PE, but risk of major bleeding limits its use despite its efficacy. While mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has emerged as an alternative reperfusion strategy, real-world safety data remains limited. The objective of this single-center retrospective observational cohort study was to characterize the safety profile and procedural complications of MT. Methods Adult patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk PE who underwent MT at a quaternary academic medical center between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2024, were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, procedural, outcome, and mortality data were collected. Major adverse events and bleeding were defined according to established criteria. Results From a total of 103 screened patients, 65 were included. Of these, 22 (34%) were classified as high-risk and 43 (66%) as intermediate-risk. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. High-risk patients demonstrated greater clinical disease severity, with higher mean Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) scores (188.5 vs 122.4). Clinical deterioration prior to MT occurred in 35% of intermediate-risk patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) consultation rate (32% vs 7%), peri-procedural ECMO use (18% vs 2.3%), major bleeding (27% vs 4.7%), and in-hospital mortality (36% vs 11.6%) were higher in the high-risk group. Thrombus removal was achieved in 77% and 88% of high- and intermediate-risk patients, respectively. High-risk patients had longer ICU (mean 4 vs 1.3 days) and hospital stays (mean 21.5 vs 6.4 days), higher thirty-day mortality (36% vs 14%), and lower 90-day survival (59% vs 79%). Conclusions MT achieved high rates of thrombus removal in both groups. In this retrospective cohort, high-risk patients had greater baseline clinical severity and was associated with higher bleeding rates, greater resource utilization, including ECMO consultation and peri-procedural use, prolonged ICU and hospital stays, as well as increased mortality.

Case Description: A 68-year-old man with end-stage renal disease on dialysis, peripheral vascular disease with metatarsal amputations, atrial fibrillation and type 1 diabetes was admitted for foot osteomyelitis secondary to MSSA bacteremia. Transesophageal echocardiogram revealed mobile mitral valve vegetations up to 1.8cm on the atrial aspect of the posterior mitral valve leaflet which prolapsed through the mitral valve during diastole. Ejection fraction was 60% and there was trivial-mild mitral regurgitation without valvular destruction or peri-annular extension into the mitral annulus. MRI brain showed bilateral cerebral and cerebellar hemispheric infarcts, consistent with acute embolic stroke. He was at high risk for both recurrent embolism and operative mortality (STS risk score 51%) due to his comorbidities and risk of hemorrhagic conversion of stroke. After shared decision making, percutaneous aspiration of the mitral vegetation was performed with AngioVac (Fig). Cerebral embolism protection devices were deployed prior to AngioVac evacuation of the mass. There was no residual mitral regurgitation and only a small vegetation strand remained (Fig). Surgical pathology confirmed MSSA endocarditis. Blood cultures remained negative, and the patient did not suffer from recurrent embolic events. The patient underwent revision metatarsal amputation and was discharged with a 6-week course of IV cefazolin. Discussion: Infective endocarditis with high embolic risk is life-threatening and challenging to treat in patients with high surgical risk. We illustrate a case of percutaneous vegetation aspiration using the AngioVac device in our patient who suffered from embolic strokes due to MSSA mitral valve endocarditis. Meta-analyses have shown clinically successful debulking in 90% of cases, with 82% of patients able to clear bacteremia with AngioVac. Although most commonly used in right-sided lesions, percutaneous debulking of left-sided endocarditis with AngioVac and cerebral protection can be considered as a treatment strategy in select patients with prohibitive surgical risk.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death and necessitates prompt, accurate risk assessment at initial diagnosis to guide treatment and reduce associated mortality. Intermediate-risk PE, defined as the presence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in the absence of hemodynamic compromise, carries a significant risk for adverse clinical outcomes and represents a unique diagnostic challenge. While small clinical trials have evaluated advanced treatment strategies beyond standard anticoagulation, such as thrombolytic or endovascular therapy, there remains continued debate on the optimal care for this patient population. Here, we review the most recent risk stratification models, highlighting differences between prediction scores and their limitations, and discuss the utility of serologic biomarkers and imaging modalities to detect right ventricular dysfunction. Additionally, we examine current treatment recommendations including anticoagulation strategies, use of thrombolytics at full and reduced doses, and utilization of invasive treatment options. Current knowledge gaps and ongoing studies are highlighted.