Bobek, Olivia

Abstract Purpose: Mutations in hematopoietic progenitor cells accumulate with age leading to clonal expansion, termed clonal hematopoiesis (CH). CH in the general population is associated with hematopoietic neoplasms and reduced overall survival (OS), predominantly through cardiovascular adverse events (CVAE). Because androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) used in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are also associated with CVAEs and because CH negatively impacted survival in an advanced solid tumor cohort, we hypothesized that CH in mCRPC may be associated with increased CVAEs and inferior survival. Experimental Design: A targeted DNA sequencing panel captured common CH mutations in pretreatment blood samples from 957 patients enrolled in Alliance A031201: a randomized trial of enzalutamide ± abiraterone/prednisone in the first-line mCRPC setting. The primary outcome was the impact of CH on OS; the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and CVAEs. Results: Baseline comorbidities were similar by CH status. No differences in OS/progression-free survival were detected regardless of treatment arm or the variant allele frequency threshold used to define CH [primary: 2% (normal-CH, N-CH); exploratory: 0.5% (low-CH) and 10% (high-CH, H-CH)]. Patients with H-CH (7.2%) and TET2-mutated N-CH (6.0%) had greater odds of any CVAE (14.5% vs. 4.0%; P = 0.0004 and 12.3% vs. 4.2%; P = 0.010, respectively). More major CVAEs were observed in patients with H-CH (5.8% vs. 1.9%; P = 0.042) and N-CH (3.4% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.147). Conclusions: CH did not affect survival in patients with mCRPC treated with ARPIs in A031201. H-CH and TET2-mutated CH were associated with more CVAEs. These findings inform the risk/benefit discussion about ARPIs in mCRPC.

TPS5108 Background: Penile cancer is a devastating malignancy that affects just over 2000 patients per year in the United States and approximately 40,000 worldwide. Metastatic or unresectable penile cancer is rapidly fatal in most cases and there are few effective systemic therapy options.1 There is an urgent need for alternatives to chemotherapy such as immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting nectin-4 protein on the tumor cell surface and having efficacy in treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma.2 Recent studies have demonstrated frequent and strong expression of nectin-4 in penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC).3,4 In this setting, Mayo Clinic is leading a phase II trial of EV for advanced PSCC, currently in progress. Methods: This single arm, open-label, two-stage, phase II trial evaluates best overall response rate (BRR) to EV in patients with PSCC regional lymph node involvement or distant metastatic (M1) disease. Participants may have had any prior systemic therapy or be treatment naïve. Previously untreated patients must be ineligible for or have refused surgery or radiotherapy, have N2-N3 disease and are ineligible for or have refused neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or have clinical evidence of M1 disease. Participants will receive treatment with EV until disease progression, withdrawal, death, or limiting toxicity. Participants will receive EV 1.25 mg/kg intravenous on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, with tumor assessment performed at 8-week intervals. The primary endpoint is the combined BRR of partial and complete responses (whether confirmed or unconfirmed) according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints are confirmed response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events, and BRR in HPV related and unrelated subgroups. Stage 1 will consist of 15 participants, and if there are 2 or more responses will proceed to Stage 2 with an additional 10 participants. The trial opened to enrollment in December 2023, and is active at Mayo Clinic sites in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. Clinical trial information: Funding and drug supplied by Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc./Seagen Inc. NCT06104618. 1. Chahoud J, et al., Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Jan 1;32(1):8-16. 2. Powles T, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1125-1135. 3. Tekin B, et al. Hum Pathol. 2023 Dec;142:42-50. 4. Grass GD, et al. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Jan 10;49:1-5. Clinical trial information: NCT06104618 .

220 Background: There is a critical need to identify biomarkers of response and resistance to 177Lu-PSMA-617. Post-hoc analyses of VISION have explored the prognostic and predictive value of select clinical parameters. However, we are still in the early stages of deciphering which molecular changes are associated with favorable or adverse treatment outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), who received 177Lu-PSMA-617 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, in the interval of March 2022 to March 2023. We included patients who provided research authorization, had a baseline PSA of at least 2 ng/mL, received at least 2 cycles of treatment, and had circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genomic profiling performed by Guardant (83 gene panel) within 60 days of treatment initiation. Clinical, laboratory, genomic, and radiomic parameters were abstracted by trained research personnel. Two independent analyses of “response” and “resistance” were performed. Response to treatment was defined as 50% or greater decrease in PSA from baseline (PSA50 response: dichotomized yes versus no), and resistance was defined as non-decreasing or rising PSA during treatment (PSA non-response: dichotomized yes versus no). Associations between gene alterations and response and resistance were evaluated via Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Between March 2022 and March 2023, 273 patients received cycle 1 of 177Lu-PSMA-617. A total of 108 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median number of cycles at data cutoff was 6 (IQR: 4,6) with 57 (53%) patients receiving all 6 planned cycles. The median PSA at baseline was 16.65 ng/ml (IQR: 5.20, 66.12). A total of 65 patients (60%) experienced a PSA50 response. No molecular alterations were associated with a higher rate of PSA50 response; however, alterations in ARID1A, AR, and CHEK2 were associated with lack of PSA50 response (Fisher’s exact p < 0.05). Of the 108 evaluable patients, 20 (19%) met criteria for PSA non-response. Alterations in AR, ARID1A, MYC, TP53, CHEK2, ATM, EGFR, and NOTCH1 were significantly associated with PSA non-response (Fisher’s exact p < 0.05); in each case, the presence of the alteration was positively associated with resistance (i.e., more instance of PSA non-response). No biomarkers were found to be inversely associated with PSA non-response. Conclusions: ctDNA assessed by commercially available, targeted sequencing panels prior to treatment may be useful in identifying the patients least likely to benefit from 177Lu-PSMA-617. Further work is ongoing to integrate ctDNA findings with clinical parameters in the hopes of understanding the factors mediating response and resistance to therapy.

Introduction: AutoHCT is an effective therapy for patients (pts) with DLBCL who are refractory or relapse following first-line chemotherapy, but long term outcomes remain suboptimal. The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has shown promising activity in pts with ABC-DLBCL (Wilson et al, Nat Med 2015). In 2016 we launched a randomized phase III clinical trial to evaluate the addition of ibrutinib to AutoHCT as part of conditioning and as consolidation therapy for pts with relapsed/refractory ABC-DLBCL. Patients and Methods: Following assessment of open-label treatment in a safety cohort of 6 pts, we randomly assigned pts with chemotherapy-sensitive persistent or relapsed ABC-DLBCL to receive ibrutinib 560 mg [Arm A] or placebo [Arm B] concurrently with conditioning on days -6 to -1 of AutoHCT (Cycle 1). Following count recovery and resolution of acute toxicities, pts continued ibrutinib 560 mg in Arm A or placebo in Arm B for 12 additional 28-day cycles. Crossover to Arm A using single agent ibrutinib was allowed for pts progressing on Arm B. Central pathology review was performed for disease confirmation and subtype assignment. Initially, ABC subtype assignment was performed using the Nanostring Lymphoma Subtyping Test (LST) but the study was amended to use the IHC-based Hans classifier for non-GCB on 8/15/19. Other key eligibility criteria included receipt of no more than 3 prior regimens, no active CNS involvement, no need for long-term anticoagulation, and no prior progression on Ibrutinib. Pts were stratified by time to relapse (&lt;=12 mos vs &gt;12 mos), type of conditioning (BEAM or CBV) and prior ibrutinib use. The original design required 296 patients with 82% power to detect a difference in 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 67% vs. 50% with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. A revised statistical design allowed an interim futility analysis to be conducted after 40 pts were enrolled and followed for 2 years. Even though the study met criteria to continue accrual to a target of 160 pts, we decided to close it early due to declining accrual on 12/20/2022. We hereby present the primary analysis of the evaluable patients enrolled (data as of 07/17/2023). Results: Between 2/6/17 and 8/24/18, we screened 255 pts but enrolled only 34 (13%) largely due to long assay turnaround times and performance characteristics with the LST. Following the switch to the IHC-based Hans classifier (after 8/15/19), 60 out of 110 pts screened were enrolled (54%) in line with our a priori expectation. In total, 45 pts were randomized to Arm A vs. 43 to Arm B, with 39 and 38, respectively, being evaluable for the primary endpoint at this time. Median age was 61 years (range 20-75 years), median number of prior lines of therapy was 2, 46% of the pts were female, 21% were refractory or had early relapse, 94% were planned to receive BEAM conditioning. Overall, 87% of pts in Arm A and 88% in Arm B underwent conditioning while 70% and 67% respectively, started maintenance therapy. The median number of cycles received was 6 in Arm A vs. 5 in Arm B. The primary endpoint of 2-year PFS was 57.6% (95% CI: 42.1%, 78.8%) in Arm A vs. 40.8% (95% CI: 26.5, 62.8%) in Arm B (HR=0.54; 95% CI: 0.26, 1.10; log-rank p = 0.087). Median PFS was 26.5 months (95% CI: 10.2, not reached [NR]) in Arm A vs. 8.1 months (95% CI: 5.4, NR) in Arm B. Only one pt crossed over to Arm A after progression on Arm B. The most common grade 3-4 AEs in each of the arms were: neutropenia (A: 14%, B: 14%), febrile neutropenia (A: 11%, B: 9%), and thrombocytopenia (A: 11%, B: 7%). Rates of any grade atrial fibrillation were similar between arms (12.8% in Arm A vs. 10.5% in Arm B); one patient had grade 3 and one patient had grade 4 atrial fibrillation, both in Arm B. Six pts had reported grade 5 events (Arm A: 2 sepsis, 1 COVID-19, 1 respiratory failure and 1 disease progression and Arm B: 1 disease progression) but only one grade 5 event (sepsis, Arm A) was deemed probably related to treatment. Conclusions: Despite an early high rate of screen failures and declining accruals due to competition with CAR-T cell therapy, the primary analysis suggests that ibrutinib with and following AutoHCT in relapsed/refractory ABC-DLBCL is well-tolerated and may improve PFS in this high-risk patient population. This trial was supported by: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; U10CA180820, UG1CA233234 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180868 (NRG); U10CA180888 (SWOG) ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02443077 https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org

5021 Background: Somatic mutations in hematopoietic progenitor cells accumulate with age leading to clonal expansion in a process called clonal hematopoiesis (CH). CH increases the risk of developing myeloid neoplasms and shortens overall survival (OS), primarily linked to increased cardiovascular (CV) mortality. The impact of CH in metastatic solid cancers has been conflicting, with shorter OS in a broad cancer cohort but prolonged OS in metastatic colorectal cancer, which may be influenced by prior cytotoxic therapy that can promote emergence of CH. As AR pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) are associated with CV adverse events (AE), exploring the impact of CH in patients (pts) with mCRPC is of interest. Methods: A 9 gene targeted DNA sequencing panel designed to capture common CH mutations ( DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, PPM1D, TP53, CHEK2, SRSF2, SF3B1, JAK2) was applied to pre-treatment peripheral blood samples of 957 pts enrolled in the Alliance A031201 phase 3 trial of enzalutamide versus enzalutamide plus abiraterone/prednisone in the first line mCRPC setting. No difference in OS was found between treatment arms. The primary endpoint was the impact of CH on OS; secondary and exploratory endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and associations with baseline comorbidities and AEs (hematologic and CV). Cox proportional-hazards and logit models were adjusted for treatment arm, age, and radiation therapy (RT). Results: CH was common with 57% of pts having low CH (VAF>0.5% in 1+ mutation, L-CH), 24% having standard CH (VAF>2%, CH), and 7% having high CH (VAF>10%, H-CH). 4% of pts had 2+ CH mutations and 1% had 3+ mutations. Patients with CH were older (73.1 vs 70.2) and had higher rates of prior RT (58.4% vs 55.7%) and prior chemotherapy (3.9% vs 2.2%). No differences in OS were detected in pts with L-CH, CH, or H-CH. Similarly, no differences in PFS or baseline CV comorbidities were seen in any CH group. Pts with H-CH and TET2-mutated CH had statistically higher odds of any CV event (adjusted p=0.0004 and p=0.010, respectively) There was also a difference in the occurrence of major adverse CV events (MACE) by H-CH status (5.8% vs. 1.9%, adjusted p=0.042), while there was no difference seen for CH (3.4% vs 1.8%, adjusted p=0.147). Regarding hematologic AEs, one pt with a TP53 mutation (VAF 0.94%) developed myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusions: CH did not affect OS or PFS in pts with mCRPC treated with ARPIs in the A031201 trial. However, CH with VAF>10% and TET2-mutated CH were associated with an increased rate of all CV AEs, suggesting an additive effect of ARPI therapy and CH on adverse CV outcomes. Confirmatory studies are warranted to assess whether CH should be considered in the risk-benefit discussion for pts receiving ARPIs.

PURPOSE Enzalutamide and abiraterone both target androgen receptor signaling but via different mechanisms. The mechanism of action of one drug may counteract the resistance pathways of the other. We sought to determine whether the addition of abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) to enzalutamide prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the first-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with untreated mCRPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive first-line enzalutamide with or without AAP. The primary end point was OS. Toxicity, prostate-specific antigen declines, pharmacokinetics, and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were also examined. Data were analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and the stratified log-rank statistic were used to compare OS between treatments. RESULTS In total, 1,311 patients were randomly assigned: 657 to enzalutamide and 654 to enzalutamide plus AAP. OS was not statistically different between the two arms (median, 32.7 [95% CI, 30.5 to 35.4] months for enzalutamide v 34.2 [95% CI, 31.4 to 37.3] months for enzalutamide and AAP; hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; one-sided P = .03; boundary nominal significance level = .02). rPFS was longer in the combination arm (median rPFS, 21.3 [95% CI, 19.4 to 22.9] months for enzalutamide v 24.3 [95% CI, 22.3 to 26.7] months for enzalutamide and AAP; HR, 0.86; two-sided P = .02). However, pharmacokinetic clearance of abiraterone was 2.2- to 2.9-fold higher when administered with enzalutamide, compared with clearance values for abiraterone alone. CONCLUSION The addition of AAP to enzalutamide for first-line treatment of mCRPC was not associated with a statistically significant benefit in OS. Drug-drug interactions between the two agents resulting in increased abiraterone clearance may partly account for this result, although these interactions did not prevent the combination regimen from having more nonhematologic toxicity.

201 Background: Previous studies have evaluated peripheral whole blood mRNA to identify prognostic biomarkers in metastatic prostate cancer, with no consistent genes of prognostic significance between studies and sample collection done at various points of therapy. We aim to identify the prognostic value of 20 previously identified genes in patients mCRPC from a prospective clinical trial. Methods: Between June 2013 and August 2015, whole blood was prospectively collected in PAXgene RNA tubes from 92 men with mCRPC (NCT01953640). Gene expression from samples with RIN > 4.0 were quantified using a customized NanoString CodeSet of 20 candidate genes (C1QA, MCM2, STOM, GABARAPL2, R10K3, HMBS, TFDP1, CDKN1A, ITGAL, TMCC2, TERF2IP, MMP9, SNCA, TIMP1, SLC4A1, SELENBP1, TMEM66, SEMA4D, PROS1, CD22). The raw data from the nCounter Analysis system were normalized to the positive controls and log2 transformed. Univariable Cox proportional hazards models were performed on each target gene sufficiently above negative control (5 times the maximum value of the negative control) to evaluate associations with overall survival (OS). For each gene we considered a linear, quadratic, or categorical model with quantile cutpoints. Categorical models with cutpoints at the 25th percentile for the genes CD22, GABARAPL2, R10K3, and STOM were used as there was a nonlinear relationship between gene expression and death hazard. The remaining genes were modeled with a linear model. Findings were considered statistically significant based on p-values adjusted using the Holm-Bonferroni correction. Results: 18/20 genes were identified and passed quality control (QC) measures, which excluded C1QA and MCM2. 72/92 men had an evaluable pretreatment specimen that passed QC. The median age was 72 years. The study cohort was evenly balanced in terms of Gleason score ( < = 7 v. > 7) and 60% had high volume disease. The median follow-up time was 5.73 years (IQR: 5.39, 6.49) and 58 patients had died. Of the 18 genes evaluated, STOM (Stomatin) [hazard ratio (HR) 3.00, adjusted p = 0.007] and GABARAPL2 (GABA Type A Receptor Associated Protein Like 2) [HR 2.62, adjusted p = 0.033] were significantly associated with overall survival in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for volume of metastatic disease and Gleason score, STOM [HR 2.89, adjusted p = 0.014] was significantly associated with overall survival. Conclusions: Elevated whole blood mRNA expression of STOM is adversely associated with OS in mCRPC. Further studies investigating elucidating the molecular significance of STOM in mCRPC are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01953640 .