Back to Authors

Ozcan, B. Bersu

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6161-6587

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Citations 6

How to Prepare for Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Conferences: A Radiology Resident Guide to Success
Ghabili, Kamyar , Miao, Julia H. , Ozcan, B. Bersu , Hosni, Nicole Dittrich , Sorin, Vera , Dittrich, Nicole

RadioGraphics | June 11, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rg.250214 Get It

Subharmonic-aided pressure estimation for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response prediction in breast cancer
Choi, Sung In , Dogan, Basak, Wessner, Corinne E. , Porembka, Jessica, Machado, Priscilla , Ozcan, B. Bersu, Maysa, Abu-Khalaf, MD, MBA,, Hoyt, Kenneth , Dave, Jaydev, Giridhar, Karthik, Long, Zaiyang , Fazzio, Robert T. , Henrichsen, Tara, Forsberg, Flemming, Porembka, Jessica H. , Ozcan, B. Bersu , Unni, Nisha G , Abu‐Khalaf, Maysa , Dave, Jaydev , Henrichsen, Tara L. , Forsberg, Flemming , Nam, Kibo

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | May 12, 2026 | Volume: 158 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: A172-A173

10.1121/10.0040509 Get It

Elevated intratumoral interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) can negatively impact the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of breast cancer. This study aims to predict breast cancer pathological complete response (pCR) to NAC based on IFP measures by 3-D subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE). SHAPE uses the inverse linear relationship between hydrostatic pressure and subharmonic signal magnitude from intravascular ultrasound contrast agents. Thirty-eight breast cancer patients undergoing NAC from three clinical sites were enrolled for this study. SHAPE data were collected for each subject at 0%, 10%, and 30% of NAC completion using a Logiq E9 system (GE HeathCare) equipped with an RSP6-16D probe. The contrast agent used was Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging). The subharmonic signal gradients between tumor and adjacent normal tissue were calculated and compared with patient pathological response outcome using t-test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Pressure gradients between pCR (15 patients) and non-pCR (23 patients) groups were significantly different at 0 (p = 0.02), 10 (p = 0.03), and 30% (p = 0.0003) completion of NAC. Area under the curve values of 0.69, 0.77, and 0.86 were achieved at 0%, 10%, and 30% of NAC completion, respectively. Overall, SHAPE pressure gradients may aid prediction of NAC pathological response in breast cancer patients.
Understanding Radiation Safety: Essential Knowledge for Radiology Residents
Ozcan, B. Bersu , Anderson, Jacqueline Kunzelman , Nadim, Bardia , Sajan, Abin , Fung, Kin Fen Kevin , Kunzelman Anderson, Jacqueline

RadioGraphics | February 12, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rg.250028 Get It

Planning Ahead: Residents’ Guide to Building a Strong Financial Future
Azhideh, Arash , Ozcan, B. Bersu , Miao, Julia H. , Anderson, Jacqueline Kunzelman , Brun‐Vergara, Maria Lucia , Kunzelman Anderson, Jacqueline

RadioGraphics | December 11, 2025 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rg.250004 Get It

Winning at the Radiology Podium: First-timer’s Guide to Crafting and Delivering a Memorable Conference Presentation
Raichandani, Surbhi , Ansari, Shehbaz , Sorin, Vera , Ozcan, B. Bersu , Rouzrokh, Pouria , Rouzrokh, Pouria

RadioGraphics | November 13, 2025 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rg.250003 Get It

Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging: Challenges of Integration Into Clinical Practice
Ozcan, B. Bersu , Patel, Bhavika , Banerjee, Imon , Patel, Bhavika K , Dogan, Basak E , Banerjee, Imon

Journal of Breast Imaging | March 7, 2023 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 248-257

10.1093/jbi/wbad007 Get It

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) in breast imaging is a rapidly developing field with promising results. Despite the large number of recent publications in this field, unanswered questions have led to limited implementation of AI into daily clinical practice for breast radiologists. This paper provides an overview of the key limitations of AI in breast imaging including, but not limited to, limited numbers of FDA-approved algorithms and annotated data sets with histologic ground truth; concerns surrounding data privacy, security, algorithm transparency, and bias; and ethical issues. Ultimately, the successful implementation of AI into clinical care will require thoughtful action to address these challenges, transparency, and sharing of AI implementation workflows, limitations, and performance metrics within the breast imaging community and other end-users.