INTRODUCTION: Bloating, distention, and gas-related gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are frequently reported by patients across the spectrum of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). We aimed to characterize these using latent class modeling in a large multinational survey. METHODS: A nationwide survey of adults in the United States, United Kingdom, and Mexico used quota sampling for demographic balance. It included Rome IV diagnostic questions, Intestinal Gas Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaires for anxiety and depression (PHQ-4) and somatization (PHQ-12), quality of life (PROMIS Global-10), and lifestyle questions. Latent class analysis was performed using “depmix” in RStudio 4.2.3. RESULTS: A total of 3,471 subjects experiencing bloating and/or distention (mean age 43 years, 57% female) were included. Using 42 demographic and pertinent clinical variables, latent class analysis revealed 6 distinct clusters. The first 2 clusters demonstrated limited-to-moderate impairment in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with both characterized by some degree of dietary and supplement associations; however, cluster 2 lacked specific triggers observed in other clusters. The subsequent 2 clusters showed favorable HRQoL and mild gas-related symptoms, with only cluster 4 exhibiting distinct dietary triggers. The final 2 clusters, associated with bowel dysfunction, showed a higher prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation and IBS mixed in cluster 5, and IBS with diarrhea in cluster 6. These bowel dysfunction clusters exhibited severe gas symptoms in the preceding 24 hours and greater HRQoL impairment compared with the other 4 clusters. Notably, cluster 5 was linked to dietary triggers, whereas cluster 6 was defined by psychosocial comorbidities. DISCUSSION: Bloating and distention patients are likely driven by variable influences of dietary, psychological, and bowel dysfunction. Further studies are needed to identify mechanisms and titrate treatment suited to specific mechanistic drivers.
Thermodynamic Indices of Brain Activity to Identify People with Good Cognitive Capacity (P4-6.002)
AbstractBackgroundThe Rome IV irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) criteria include changes to the description and frequency of abdominal pain. Existing studies have demonstrated a lower prevalence and greater severity in IBS patients identified using Rome IV than Rome III criteria. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of post‐infection IBS (PI‐IBS) using Rome IV criteria in a population‐based cohort of laboratory‐confirmed C. jejuni infection cases.MethodsThe Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) requires notification of Campylobacter cases and interviews patients to gather information on clinical symptoms. For this study, the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire was utilized 6–9 months after infection to determine the development of PI‐IBS. The survey responses were analyzed for the prevalence of IBS and symptom severity.Key ResultsSurveys were completed by 391 participants (31% response rate). Twenty‐three patients had pre‐existing IBS, and 18 did not complete enough questions to categorize their case status. Of the 350 remaining participants, 58 (17%) met Rome IV criteria. An additional 47 patients would have met the Rome III IBS criteria for pain frequency, driving the cumulative prevalence to 30%. The mean IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS‐SSS) in Rome IV patients was significantly higher than in Rome III (p < 0.05). With Rome IV, IBS‐diarrhea was the most common subtype.Conclusions & InferencesRome IV criteria resulted in a 19% lower prevalence of PI‐IBS than earlier reported Rome III‐based prevalence in a similar population. Rome IV defined PI‐IBS patients have greater symptom severity but similar distribution of IBS subtypes.