Fraune, Christoph

Context.— The pathologic diagnosis of pulmonary extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) is challenging. Objective.— To evaluate the diagnostic usefulness and limitations of current diagnostic strategies for pulmonary MALT lymphoma. Design.— A retrospective review of 120 cases of pulmonary MALT lymphoma from 2014 through 2021 was performed. Results.— Clinicoradiologic presentations overlapped with previous observations in patients with MALT lymphoma, such as a wide age range, female predominance, frequent association with autoimmune disease or immunodeficiency, and broad imaging findings. The histopathologic diagnosis was based on a combination of morphology, immunohistochemistry, and demonstration of B-cell lineage clonality. Two-thirds (76 of 113) of MALT lymphomas had lymphoplasmacytoid cytomorphology. Occasionally, MALT lymphomas were associated with granulomas/giant cells (29%, 35 of 120) or immunoglobulin deposition disease (21%, 25 of 120), including light chain/heavy chain deposition disease, amyloidosis, and/or crystal storing histiocytosis. While CD5, CD10, Bcl-2, and Bcl-6 rarely revealed aberrancies, aberrant CD43 expression either on B-cells or on plasma cells was detected in 42% (27 of 64) of cases, including cases for which proof of clonality could not be obtained. κ/λ in situ hybridization was particularly useful for tumors with lymphoplasmacytoid morphology but performed poorly in lymphomas having no plasmacytic differentiation. κ/λ immunohistochemistry showed no additional usefulness when applied together with κ/λ in situ hybridization. Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement studies by polymerase chain reaction achieved high detection rates of clonality in all cytomorphologic subgroups. Conclusions.— Our study offers a practical evaluation of common diagnostic tests in pulmonary MALT lymphoma. We offer recommendations for a diagnostic workup that takes into consideration the usefulness and the specific limitations of the various diagnostic strategies.

The use of lymphoid interstitial pneumonia (LIP) as a diagnostic term has changed considerably since its introduction. Utilizing a multi-institutional collection of 201 cases from the last 20 years that demonstrate features associated with the LIP rubric, we compared cases meeting strict histologic criteria of LIP per American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) consensus (“pathologic LIP”; n=62) with cystic cases fulfilling radiologic ATS/ERS criteria (“radiologic LIP”; n=33) and with other diffuse benign lymphoid proliferations. “Pathologic LIP” was associated with immune dysregulation including autoimmune disorders and immune deficiency, whereas “radiologic LIP” was only seen with autoimmune disorders. No case of idiopathic LIP was found. On histology, “pathologic LIP” represented a subgroup of 70% (62/88) of cases with the distinctive pattern of diffuse expansile lymphoid infiltrates. In contrast, “radiologic LIP” demonstrated a broad spectrum of inflammatory patterns, airway-centered inflammation being most common (52%; 17/33). Only 5 cases with radiologic cysts also met consensus ATS/ERS criteria for “pathologic LIP.” Overall, broad overlap was observed with the remaining study cases that failed to meet consensus criteria for “radiologic LIP” and/or “pathologic LIP.” These data raise concerns about the practical use of the term LIP as currently defined. What radiologists and pathologist encounter as LIP differs remarkably, but neither “radiologic LIP” nor “pathologic LIP” present with sufficiently distinct findings to delineate such cases from other patterns of diffuse benign lymphoid proliferations. As a result of this study, we believe LIP should be abandoned as a pathologic and radiologic diagnosis.