Cohen, Peter

Abstract Recent guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncologists recommend that obese individuals receive chemotherapy based on their actual body weight (ABW) without dose reduction. Contrary to prior reports, our own data demonstrate that ABW-dosed chemotherapy or immunotherapy is as effective and well tolerated by obese mice as by lean mice. Nonetheless, obese mice develop significantly greater weight loss in a dose-dependent manner during the entire period that they receive therapy, with corresponding quantifiable reductions in visceral fat depots. This disparity is not explained by altered food intake, as both lean and obese mice experience less than a week of anorexia which does not recur after Cycle 1 of treatment. Furthermore, malabsorption is absent. These observations are relevant to multiple classes of chemo agents. Altered pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy agents in adipose tissue have been reported, yet the pharmacodynamics of obesity remain speculative. Fasting blood glucose monitoring demonstrates glucose level variances which are temporally linked to treatment, rendering it likely that chemotherapy and immunotherapy provoke adipose tissue lipolysis, or alternatively cytoreduction or immunomodulation of adipocyte progenitor cells. Understanding these effects could contribute to improved treatment regimens in the setting of obesity.

Abstract Purpose: Little is known about the association between myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) subsets and various chemokines in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or the factors that draw MDSC into tumor parenchyma. Experimental Design: We analyzed polymorphonuclear MDSC (PMN-MDSC), monocytic MDSC (M-MDSC), and immature MDSC (I-MDSC) from the parenchyma and peripheral blood of 48 patients with RCC, isolated at nephrectomy. We analyzed levels of IL1β, IL8, CXCL5, Mip-1α, MCP-1, and Rantes. Furthermore, we performed experiments in a Renca murine model to assess therapeutic synergy between CXCR2 and anti-PD1 and to elucidate the impact of IL1β blockade on MDSC. Results: Parenchymal PMN-MDSC have a positive correlation with IL1β, IL8, CXCL5, and Mip-1α, and I-MDSC correlate with IL8 and CXCL5. Furthermore, peripheral PMN-MDSC correlate with tumor grade. Given that PMN-MDSC express CXCR2 and parenchymal PMN-MDSC correlated with IL8 and CXCL5, we assessed the response of CXCR2 blockade with or without anti-PD1. Combination therapy reduced tumor weight and enhanced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration. In addition, anti-IL1β decreased PMN-MDSC and M-MDSC in the periphery, PMN-MDSC in the tumor, and peripheral CXCL5 and KC. Anti-IL1β also delayed tumor growth. Conclusions: Parenchymal PMN-MDSC have a positive correlation with IL1β, IL8, CXCL5, and Mip-1α, suggesting they may attract PMN-MDSC into the tumor. Peripheral PMN-MDSC correlate with tumor grade, suggesting prognostic significance. Anti-CXCR2 and anti-PD1 synergized to reduce tumor weight and enhanced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration in a Renca murine model, suggesting that CXCR2+ PMN-MDSC are important in reducing activity of anti-PD1 antibody. Finally, anti-IL1β decreases MDSC and delayed tumor growth, suggesting a potential target for MDSC inhibition. Clin Cancer Res; 23(9); 2346–55. ©2016 AACR.