Back to Authors

Weber, David J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-4435

Mayo Clinic

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Citations 4

Multisociety guidance for sterilization and high-level disinfection
Shenoy, Erica S. , Weber, David J. , McMullen, Kathleen , Rubin, Zachary, Sampathkumar, Priya , Schaffzin, Joshua K. , Sickbert-Bennett, Emily , Washer, Laraine , Yokoe, Deborah S. , Calderwood, Audrey H. , Chinn, Raymond , Day, Michelle, Garcia‐Houchins, Sylvia, Javaid, Waleed , Klacik, Susan, Kyle, Erin , Murthy, Rekha , Wood, Amber , Rutala, William A.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology | April 28, 2025 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 561-583

10.1017/ice.2025.41 Get It

Abstract This multisociety infection prevention guidance document was developed for individuals and organizations that engage in sterilization or high-level disinfection (HLD). It was endorsed by SHEA, APIC, ASGE, IDSA, and SGNA. This guidance is based on a synthesis of published scientific evidence, theoretical rationale, current practices, practical considerations, writing group consensus, and consideration of potential harm when applicable. The supplementary material includes a summary of recommendations. The guidance provides an overview of the Spaulding Classification and considerations around manufacturers’ instructions for use (MIFUs). Its recommendations address: point-of-use treatment prior to sterilization or HLD, preparation of reusable medical devices at the location of processing, sterilization, and immediate use steam sterilization (IUSS), HLD of lumened and non-lumened devices, processing of reusable medical devices used with lubricating or defoaming agents, monitoring for effectiveness of processing, handling of devices after HLD, augments and alternatives to HLD, processing of investigational devices, tracking of reusable medical devices, and approaches to implementation.
Executive Summary: Guidelines for Evaluating New Fever in Adult Patients in the ICU
O’Grady, Naomi P., Alexander, Earnest, Alhazzani, Waleed , Alshamsi, Fayez , Cuellar‐Rodríguez, Jennifer , Jefferson, Brian , Patel, Robin , Deresinski, Stanley C. , Patel, Robin , Kalil, André C. , Pastores, Stephen M. , van Duin, David , Weber, David J.

Critical Care Medicine | October 12, 2023 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1566-1569

10.1097/ccm.0000000000006021 Get It

Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for Evaluating New Fever in Adult Patients in the ICU
O’Grady, Naomi P., Alexander, Earnest, Alhazzani, Waleed , Alshamsi, Fayez , Cuellar‐Rodríguez, Jennifer , Jefferson, Brian , Patel, Robin , Deresinski, Stanley C. , Patel, Robin , Kalil, André C. , Pastores, Stephen M. , van Duin, David , Weber, David J.

Critical Care Medicine | October 12, 2023 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1570-1586

10.1097/ccm.0000000000006022 Get It

RATIONALE: Fever is frequently an early indicator of infection and often requires rigorous diagnostic evaluation. OBJECTIVES: This is an update of the 2008 Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society (IDSA) and Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) guideline for the evaluation of new-onset fever in adult ICU patients without severe immunocompromise, now using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. PANEL DESIGN: The SCCM and IDSA convened a taskforce to update the 2008 version of the guideline for the evaluation of new fever in critically ill adult patients, which included expert clinicians as well as methodologists from the Guidelines in Intensive Care, Development and Evaluation Group. The guidelines committee consisted of 12 experts in critical care, infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, organ transplantation, public health, clinical research, and health policy and administration. All task force members followed all conflict-of-interest procedures as documented in the American College of Critical Care Medicine/SCCM Standard Operating Procedures Manual and the IDSA. There was no industry input or funding to produce this guideline. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review for each population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak or as best-practice statements. RESULTS: The panel issued 12 recommendations and 9 best practice statements. The panel recommended using central temperature monitoring methods, including thermistors for pulmonary artery catheters, bladder catheters, or esophageal balloon thermistors when these devices are in place or accurate temperature measurements are critical for diagnosis and management. For patients without these devices in place, oral or rectal temperatures over other temperature measurement methods that are less reliable such as axillary or tympanic membrane temperatures, noninvasive temporal artery thermometers, or chemical dot thermometers were recommended. Imaging studies including ultrasonography were recommended in addition to microbiological evaluation using rapid diagnostic testing strategies. Biomarkers were recommended to assist in guiding the discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy. All recommendations issued were weak based on the quality of data. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines panel was able to formulate several recommendations for the evaluation of new fever in a critically ill adult patient, acknowledging that most recommendations were based on weak evidence. This highlights the need for the rapid advancement of research in all aspects of this issue—including better noninvasive methods to measure core body temperature, the use of diagnostic imaging, advances in microbiology including molecular testing, and the use of biomarkers.
Laboratory Preparedness for the Current Monkeypox Outbreak
Rodino, Kyle G. , Bearman, Gonzalo , Binnicker, Matthew J. , Isaacs, Stuart N. , Pinsky, Benjamin A. , Pinsky, Benjamin A , Babady, N. Esther , Weber, David J.

Clinical Chemistry | December 22, 2022 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 118-124

10.1093/clinchem/hvac198 Get It