Isha, Shahin

Introduction: Sepsis and its associated systemic inflammatory response syndrome in the heart can lead to septic cardiomyopathy. We aim to explore new onset cardiac dysfunction in septic shock patients and its association of right heart dysfunction with hospital outcomes. Hypothesis: Early development of correct ventricular abnormalities due to septic shock may lead to worse hospital outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 102 patients who were hospitalized at the Mayo Clinic between August 2018 and September 2022 with septic shock and had at least one pre-sepsis echo (within one year before admission) and one post-sepsis echo (within seven days of access). Information on patient demographics, comorbidities, echo parameters, and outcomes was collected from our sepsis database and retrospective chart review. Categorical variables were described as percentages and compared by Chi-square test, and continuous variables as medians and compared using an independent sample t-test. Statistical analysis was performed using BlueSky Statistics v10.3.1. Results: Our study included 102 patients with a median age of 68 (55, 78) years, the majority being men (68%) and Caucasians (80%). Between pre- and post-sepsis echos, there was a noticeable decrease in LVEF (60% vs 50.5 %; p=0.002). Moreover, there was an increase in reduced RV function (31.6% vs. 62.6%, p<0.001), reduced LV function (56.5% vs. 85.2%, p=0.048), and RV dilatation (35.8% vs. 51.5%, p=0.03). There was also a noticeable decrease in IVC collapsibility of more than 50% (65.9% vs 22.9%, p<0.001). There was no significance in terms of demographics, comorbidities, and baseline vitals and labs among patients with RV dysfunction and without RV dysfunction except for a lower LVEF (49% vs 62 %, p= 0.004) and decreased >50 % IVC collapsibility (14.5% vs 48%, p=0.005) in RV dysfunction group. We found no differences in hospital mortality, ICU and hospital LOS, or mechanical ventilation requirements amongst patients with RV abnormalities in function and size. Conclusions: Our retrospective study shows that abnormalities in RV function and RV size are commonly observed in the initial week of septic shock. However, such RV abnormalities did not translate into worse hospital outcomes.

Background: Impella 5.5® with Smart Assist is a minimally invasive Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD) approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating ongoing cardiogenic shock for up to 14 days. The Impella® intends to reduce ventricular workload and provide the circulatory support necessary for myocardial recovery. Research Question: Compared to standard practice, does adding an extension piece to the purge tube side arm of the Impella® Device decrease the incidence of device failure and positively impact the health outcome of adult patients receiving Impella® support? Study Design and Methods: A retrospective chart review of ICU patients was done at a tertiary care center from August 2018 to August 2022 to assess the differences in patient outcomes related to Impella® Device utilization before and after the implementation of the extension piece to the purge tube sidearm. Among patients reviewed, a total of 20 were included in our review, with seven not having the purge tube side arm extension added, while 13 patients had the extension. Results: The two study groups had no significant difference in patient health outcomes. Additionally, there were no instances of device failure requiring explanation without the extension tubing. However, there were no cases of the purge cassette cracking with the addition of the extension tubing. Conclusion: The addition of extension tubing to the purge cassette of the Impella® Device did not impact patient health outcomes or the incidence of device failure. There was a complete reduction in the incidence of the purge cassette cracking, which could reduce the potential for infection or device failure over a long period of mechanical support. There is a need for long-term prospective studies to confirm the results.

AbstractBackgroundPatients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often experience extended periods of immobility. Following hospital discharge, many face impaired mobility and never return to their baseline function. Although the benefits of physical and occupational rehabilitation are well established in non‐ICU patients, a paucity of work describes effective practices to alleviate ICU‐related declines in mobility.ObjectiveTo assess how rehabilitation with physical and occupational therapy (PT‐OT) during ICU stays affects patients' mobility, self‐care, and length of hospital stay.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingInpatient ICU.ParticipantsA total of 6628 adult patients who received physical rehabilitation across multiple sites (Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) of a single institution between January 2018 and December 2021.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresDescriptive statistics, linear regression models, and gradient boosting machine methods were used to determine the relationship between the amount of PT‐OT received and outcomes of hospital length of stay (LOS), Activity Measure for Post‐Acute Care Daily Activity and Basic Mobility scores.ResultsThe 6628 patients who met inclusion criteria received an average (median) of 23 (range: 1‐89) minutes of PT‐OT per day. Regression analyses showed each additional 10 minutes of PT‐OT per day was associated with a 1.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41–1.66, p < .001) higher final Basic Mobility score, a 1.8% (95% CI: 1.30%–2.34%, p < .001) higher final Daily Activity score, and a 1.2‐day (95% CI: −1.28 to −1.09, p < .001) lower hospital LOS. One‐dimensional partial dependence plots revealed an exponential decrease in predicted LOS as minutes of PT‐OT received increased.ConclusionHigher rehabilitation minutes provided to patients in the ICU may reduce the LOS and improve patients' functional outcomes at discharge. The benefits of rehabilitation increased with increasing amounts of time of therapy received.