Diseases, Infectious

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) incidence estimates vary between geographic regions; few studies have evaluated the impact of CDI test order frequency on estimated CDI incidence. We evaluated this impact in a sample of hospitals at two CDC Emerging Infections Program (EIP) sites. Methods Daily surveillance was conducted for diarrhea among inpatients at 5 acute care hospitals (2,379 beds) in EIP sites in NY (2 hospitals) and GA (3 hospitals) during two 10-workday periods in 2020 and 2021. Diarrhea onset, test orders, and specimen collection status were ascertained. Stools were tested by PCR/NAAT initially or after negative EIA toxin. Differences in diarrhea incidence, testing frequency, and CDI positivity across site, care locations and hospitals were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Correlates of CDI testing and positivity were assessed using modified Poisson regression. Estimates of incidence using EIP methodology at 5 hospitals was compared between sites using Mantel-Hanzel summary rate ratio. Results Surveillance of 38,365 patient-days (PD) identified 860 diarrhea cases from 107 patient-care locations mapped to 26 unique NHSN defined location-types. Incidence of diarrhea was 22.4/1000 PD (medians 25.8 NY, 16.2 GA, P< 0.01); with similar proportions of diarrhea being hospital-onset (66%) and CDI positive (17%) by site. Overall, 35% were tested for CDI (21% NY, 49% GA, P< 0.01). Percent tested varied by NHSN location type (Figure). Regression models identified location-type (oncology, critical care), laxatives use, chemotherapy, and residing in EIP catchment area predictive of testing (Figure). Adjusting for these factors, NY was 49% less likely than GA to test (aRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.40-0.63). Simulation of EIP methods estimated NY had a 38% lower incidence of CDI than GA (summary rate ratio 0.62, 95% CI, 0.54-0.71). Figure Incidence of Diarrheal Episodes (A) and Proportions Tested (B) among Hospitalized Patients, 2021 (solid, ward; open, critical care; grey, oncology), and adjusted relative risk (solid circles) with 95% confidence intervals (whisker) of independent predictors of testing for CDI (C). Conclusion After adjusting for patient characteristics (e.g., location-type, laxative use), the likelihood of testing still differed between NY and GA sites; the magnitude of the differences in testing was similar to that observed in estimated CDI incidence. Testing practices likely influence surveillance data and is a consideration when comparing data across regions. Disclosures Scott Fridkin, MD, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support christopher J. Myers, MS, Infectious diseases, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Udodirim N. Onwubiko, MBBS MPH, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support William C. Dube, MPH, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Sahil Khanna, MBBS, MS, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Joann M. Zamparo, MPH, Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Frederick J. Angulo, DVM PhD, Pfizer Vaccines: Employee|Pfizer Vaccines: Stocks/Bonds Ghinwa Dumyati, MD, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support.

Abstract Background Invasive Mold Infections (IMI) cause significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Although the risk has significantly decreased with the use of triazole agents as primary prophylaxis, breakthrough infections still occur. Risk factors for IMI have been well-described. Limited data exist on factors predicting mortality. Methods We identified cases using the Cancer registry and Microbiology data at Mayo Clinic Minnesota from 11/19/2011–8/6/2021 and Mayo Clinic Arizona and Florida from 09/13/2017–11/19/2021. We conducted a retrospective review to identify cases of proven/probable IMI per EORTC/MSG criteria. Patients who received at least 7 days of anti-mold prophylaxis were considered having breakthrough infection (Br-IMI). Survival function was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We evaluated predictors of mortality using Cox regression analysis. Results 401 cases of IMI were included (80.2% aspergillosis, 10.2% fusariosis, 8.4% mucormycosis, 1.2% scedosporiosis). 189 patients had proven/probable and 212 had possible disease. 12-week mortality for the entire cohort was 33%. There were 87 cases of Br-IMI (21.6%) on mold-active prophylaxis (posaconazole n=54, voriconazole n=26, isavuconazole n=5, itraconazole n=1, liposomal amphotericin B n=1). A comparison between patients not receiving prophylaxis and those with Br-IMI is shown in Table 1. Higher proportion of patients with Br-IMI had prolonged neutropenia/lymphopenia and graft-versus-host disease involving the gastrointestinal tract or lungs. Positive Aspergillus galactomannan (index ≥ 1.0) was seen more in patients who were not on mold-active prophylaxis. Mortality was 31.5% in patients not receiving prophylaxis and 41.3% with Br-IMI (Figure 1). In multivariate analysis, age, prolonged neutropenia, active HM, Br-IMI and HSCT were associated with increased mortality (Table 2). Conclusion In this cohort, the rate of Br-IMI was significant despite the use of primary prophylaxis (mainly posaconazole). Mortality was higher in patients with Br-IMI compared to those not receiving mold-active prophylaxis. Therefore, clinicians should remain alert to the possibility of Br-IMI. Disclosures Paschalis Vergidis, MD, AbbVie: DSMB|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support.