Monda, Keri L.

Background: Many patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes mellitus (DM) do not receive guideline-recommended lipid lowering therapy (LLT). We characterized LLT treatment patterns and identified predictors of high intensity statin prescriptions (Rx) in patients with ASCVD and DM. Methods: Olmsted County, MN residents with DM or ASCVD (MI, unstable angina, revascularization, ischemic stroke/TIA) from 2005-2012 were followed for 2 years capturing all LDL-C and LLT Rx. Cox regression examined predictors of high intensity statin Rx, modeling LDL-C as a time-dependent variable. Results: 8408 patients with DM (n=4881) or ASCVD (n=3527) were identified (mean age 63.1, 55.1% male). Over 2 years, mean (SD) number of LDL-C measurements was 2.7 (1.9); 12.1% had none. Among those with ≥1 LDL-C, the first was ≥100 mg/dL in 46.2%. LLT Rx increased within 30 days after the first LDL-C. (Table). However, among those with LDL-C ≥100, 40.1% were not prescribed LLT; these patients were younger (mean age 56.9 vs 60.8), more likely female (52.7% vs 45.6%) and more likely to have DM vs ASCVD (84.5% vs 54.6%) than those prescribed LLT. High intensity statin Rx increased more for those with LDL-C ≥100 than those with LDL-C <100. Men [HR 1.29 (CI 1.13-1.48)] and patients with ASCVD vs DM [6.12 (5.25-7.12)] were more likely to be prescribed high intensity statins. Higher LDL-C was associated with greater high intensity statin Rx, although associations differed between ASCVD and DM (p-interaction=0.004). Compared to DM, ASCVD patients were more likely prescribed high intensity statins at every level of LDL-C [2.73 (1.70-4.37), 6.47 (4.94-8.47), 5.68 (4.45-7.25), and 7.88 (5.89-10.53) for LDL-C <70, 70-99, 100-130, and ≥130]. Conclusions: Although high intensity statin Rx increased in response to increasing LDL-C, a large proportion of patients do not receive guideline-concordant care. Efforts should be made to encourage more aggressive treatment of elevated LDL-C and to understand why treatment is neglected or delayed.

We examined the association of variation in the type 2 diabetes risk-conferringTCF7L2gene with the risk of incident coronary heart disease (CHD) among the lean, overweight, and obese members of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study cohort. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed using a general model, with the major homozygote as the reference category. For 9,865 whites, a significant increase in the risk of CHD was seen only among lean (BMI<25 kg/m2) individuals homozygous for theTallele of theTCF7L2rs7903146 gene risk variant (hazard ratio 1.42; 95% CI 1.03,1.97;P=.01). No association was found among 3,631 blacks, regardless of BMI status. An attenuated hazard ratio was observed among the nondiabetic ARIC cohort members. This study suggests that body mass modifies the association of theTCF7L2rs7903146 T allele with CHD risk.