Kukla, Aleksandra

Background. Living kidney donation (KD) evaluation particularly focuses on glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Assessing GFR in living kidney donors can be done by estimation (eGFR) or measurement (mGFR). This study aims to evaluate the impact of eGFR equations, focusing on the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2021 equation for donor eligibility screening and the reclassification of donors excluded by eGFR criteria to mGFR assessments. Methods. Retrospective, single-center observational study of 2512 kidney donors evaluated between 2011 and 2023, at the Mayo Clinic. We performed analyses and comparisons of 4 eGFR formulae and 2 mGFR methods in terms of performance, eligibility criteria according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines/age-adjusted criteria, eligibility reclassification, and subgroup analyses. Results. The CKD-EPI 2021 resulted in a higher percentage of patients being eligible for KD (81.4%) and achieved the highest P10 (32%–34%) and P30 (87%–88%) across all mGFR methods. When patients were deemed eligible for donation by any eGFR formula, 95% retained this status on reassessment with mGFR. Conversely, when an eGFR formula classified a patient as ineligible, this was revised to be eligible in about 90% of cases on reassessment with mGFR, with a higher reclassification rate observed when the IoCl was used instead of CrCl. Conclusions. The CKD-EPI 2021 performs best for screening potential KD. If a KD is deemed ineligible by CKD-EPI 2021, there is a high likelihood that they will be reclassified as eligible when assessed with mGFR. This study strongly supports using mGFR in donor evaluations, especially when the eGFR does not meet the criteria to ensure equity of access to being a living donor.

Background. Few studies have addressed immunosuppression management after allograft failure (AF). Immunosuppression withdrawal to minimize complications must be balanced with the risk of sensitization and potentially reduced retransplantation. We aimed to determine relationships between immunosuppression, death, sensitization, and retransplantation among patients with AF. Methods. We performed a single-center retrospective study of patients transplanted from October 2007 to May 2017 with AF. We collected data on demographics, immunosuppression, calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) levels, death, retransplantation, and dialysis. Cox regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with death and retransplantation. Results. From October 2007 to May 2017, 1354 solitary ABO-compatible transplants were performed, of which 97 failed. Ten percent of patients received a preemptive retransplant. Among those who returned to dialysis (n = 87), 35% died, 25% received another transplant, and 30% remained on dialysis. After AF, 46% of patients discontinued immunosuppression. The cPRA was unchanged if immunosuppression was maintained, but immunosuppression discontinuation was associated with increased cPRA from a median (interquartile range) of 18 (0–99) to 96 (88.5–100.0; P = 0.003). Age at failure (hazard ratio, 1.1; confidence interval, 1.0-1.1) and cardiovascular disease were associated with death (hazard ratio, 2.9; confidence interval, 1.2-7.0) in multivariate analysis. Importantly, immunosuppression maintenance was not associated with increased death or retransplantation despite the increase in cPRA that occurred when immunosuppression was discontinued. Conclusions. Kidney transplant recipients with AF have a high mortality rate after dialysis initiation. Although immunosuppression withdrawal was associated with increased cPRA, it was not associated with reduced retransplantation. Therefore, it is reasonable to discontinue immunosuppression after AF despite sensitization if retransplantation is delayed.