Hodgson, Stephen F.

Abstract ABSTRACT: The cellular mechanisms for bone loss in type I (postmenopausal) osteoporosis are highly controversial. We attempted to resolve this by assessing rates of formation and resorption of iliac cancellous bone by a new histomorphometric method in 89 women with osteoporosis (mean age + SD, 66 + 6 years) and in 32 carefully selected normal postmenopausal women (64 + 6 years). In the osteoporotic women, bone resorption rate was increased by 39% (P <0.05) at the cellular level and by 67% (P <0.05) at the tissue level, whereas bone formation was unchanged at the tissue level but decreased by 14% (P <0.01) at the cellular (osteoblast) level. This pronounced remodeling imbalance (P <0.001) was probably exacerbated by a 45% increase (P < 0.1) in activation frequency of new remodeling foci. These abnormalities were associated with a high rate of cancellous bone loss (median, 5.8%/year versus 0.1%/year in controls). Thus, accelerated loss of cancellous bone in type I osteoporosis results from the combination of increased bone resorption and inadequate compensation by bone formation.

Abstract The concept that vertebral fractures are caused by excessive loss of cancellous bone has been challenged by a recent study (J Bone Min Res 2:221, 1987) suggesting that vertebral bodies are composed mainly of cortical bone rather than cancellous bone. To resolve disagreement we used two independent methods to quantify the proportions of cortical and cancellous bone in 400 μm thick sections of the bodies of the second lumbar vertebrae from six men (aged 21–58 years) and seven women (aged 25–58 years). Based on the ash weight of the manually dissected components, 80% of the total bone in men and 72% in women was cancellous bone. Based on computer-assisted scanning of sections with a microdensitometer, 81% of the total bone in men and 71% in women was cancellous bone. We conclude that the traditional concept is correct: the vertebral body is composed mainly of cancellous bone.

Abstract In a 4 year clinical trial in 202 postmenopausal osteoporotic women receiving NaF at 75 mg/day or placebo (both groups received supplementary calcium at 1500 mg/day), we found (N Engl J Med 322:801, 1990) that NaF increased bone mineral density in the lumbar spine (LS-BMD) substantially but did not decrease vertebral fracture rate (VFR), and it increased the nonvertebral fracture rate. Additional analyses and extended observations are now available on 50 women from the NaF group followed for up to 6 years of treatment. In these women, LS-BMD increased linearly over the 6 years (median rate, 8.7%/year or 0.063 g/cm2/year). Because during the 4 year trial the NaF dosage was decreased (because of side effects) in 54 of the 101 women randomized to NaF, dose-response relationships could be evaluated. For the entire study population, serum F level correlated directly with increase in LS-BMD (r = 0.61, P < 0.001). When individual person-years of observation were grouped by deciles of LS-BMD, VFR (per 100 person-years) decreased to a nadir of 24 as mean LS-BMD for the group increased from 0.6 to 1.2 g/cm2 and then doubled to 52 in the group with mean LS-BMD of 1.6 g/cm2. Multivariate analyses and inspection of three-dimensional plots revealed a complex pattern in which VFR was influenced by interaction of several variables. When the effects of LS-BMD, changes in LS-BMD, and serum F were assessed simultaneously, VFR was seen to decrease with increasing LS-BMD except when the higher LS-BMD was associated with rapid rate of increase in LS-BMD or a large increase from baseline serum F. For some patients (noncompliers or nonresponders), serum F or LS-BMD failed to increase. Thus, it is possible that lower dosages of NaF produce moderate decreases in VFR.