Back to Authors

Dickstein, Daniel R.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4606-5574

Mayo Clinic

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Citations 2

Projected Cancer Burden among Sexual and Gender Minorities by Generation in the United States
Xu, Crystal W. , Mani, Kyle , Dickstein, Daniel R. , Patel, Rohan K. , Wang, Ming , Xu, Yifei , Zaorsky, Nicholas G. , Wang, Ming , Dickstein, Daniel R

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | September 22, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: OF1-OF9

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-26-0504 Get It

Abstract Background: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) representation is growing in the United States. This study estimated the future SGM cancer burden amidst shifting cancer patterns. Methods: Age-specific incidence data for breast, prostate, colorectal, lung, and melanoma were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program’s 12-registry database. Nordpred age-period-cohort models projected incidence through 2040 to 2044. Rates were applied to US Census population estimates and generation- and sex-specific SGM identification proportions from Gallup’s 2023 to 2024 surveys. Prophet was used for sensitivity analysis. Results: At ages 55 to 59, breast cancer cases among Millennial SGMs were 3,672% higher than among Silent Generation SGMs (34,850 vs. 924 cases), melanoma cases were 1,061% higher (5,526 vs. 476 cases), and colorectal cancer cases were 2,206% higher (23,594 vs. 1,023 cases). Compared with Generation X, Millennial prostate cancer cases were 142% higher (8,100 vs. 3,344 cases), and lung cancer cases were 169% higher (5,451 vs. 2,029 cases). By 2040 to 2044, Millennials were projected to account for 68.4% of breast cancer cases and 59.7% of colorectal cancer cases among SGMs. Conclusions: At ages 55 to 59, the 5-year cancer burden was projected to be 15 times higher among Millennials than Silent Generation SGMs (77,521 vs. 5,134 cases), driven primarily by the larger SGM population in younger generations. Oncology systems will need to prepare for the increase in cancer care demand. Impact: These findings identify a substantial generational shift in the SGM cancer burden and may inform oncology workforce capacity, culturally responsive cancer care, and healthcare system preparation for this growing population.
A Review of the Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immunotherapy in the Management of Primary Central Nervous System Tumors
Lehrer, Eric J. , Sindhu, Kunal K. , Dickstein, Daniel R. , Cohen, Mira, Lazarev, Stanislav , Quiñones‐Hinojosa, Alfredo , Green, Sheryl , Sindhu, Kunal K , Dickstein, Daniel R , Jones, Brianna M. , Trifiletti, Daniel M.

Biomedicines | November 21, 2022 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2977

10.3390/biomedicines10112977 Get It

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the management of brain metastases. These therapies are commonly administered concurrently; as SRS may enhance anti-tumor immunity and responsiveness to ICIs. However, the use of ICIs with and without SRS in the management of primary brain tumors remains a controversial topic. Meningiomas are the most common nonmalignant and extra-parenchymal brain tumor, which often respond well to surgery and radiotherapy. However, higher grade meningiomas tend to be resistant to these treatments, and the use of chemotherapy and targeted agents in this setting have yielded disappointing results. Thus, there is heightened interest in the utilization of ICIs. Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary intraparenchymal brain tumor. It is associated with a grim prognosis with a median overall survival of approximately 20 months, despite optimal therapy. While SRS in the adjuvant setting, and ICI in the recurrent setting, have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit, SRS in the preoperative setting has the potential to enhance anti-tumor immunity and responsiveness to ICIs. Thus, these treatments represent an attractive option to add to the armamentarium of meningioma and glioblastoma management. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the evidence supporting the use of ICIs and SRS in each of these settings.